Encyclopedia of Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism

2007 Edition
| Editors: David Gubbins, Emilio Herrero-Bervera

Magnetization, Anhysteretic Remanent

  • Bruce M. Moskowitz
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4423-6_189

Anhysteretic remanent magnetization (ARM) is a magnetization an assemblage of magnetic particles acquires when it is subjected to an alternating field (AF) of gradually decreasing amplitude (HAF) with a constant decrement (ΔHAF/cycle) simultaneously with a steady, unidirectional DC field (HDC). The ARM is measured when both AF and DC fields are zero. Typically, the DC field is maintained while the AF is slowly ramped down to zero, and then reduced to zero. For isotropic samples, the direction of the ARM is parallel to HDC but the intensity will depend on the amplitudes and relative orientations of the AF and DC fields. The maximum ARM intensity occurs when HAF and HDC are parallel. For a standard laboratory experiment, HDCHAF with HAF = 100–200 mT and HDC = 0.05–0.1 mT. HDC is also referred to as a bias field because it produces a statistical preference or biases the direction of ARM along HDC. A special case of ARM is a partial ARM (pARM) produced by a DC field applied only for a...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

  1. Banerjee, S.K., and Mellama, J.P., 1974. A new method for the determination of paleointensity from ARM properties of rocks. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 23: 177–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banerjee, S.K., King, J.W., and Marvin, J.M., 1981. A rapid method for magnetic granulometry with applications to environmental studies. Geophysical Research Letters, 8: 333–336.Google Scholar
  3. Collinson, D.W., 1983. Methods in Rock Magnetism and Paleomagnetism: Techniques and Instrumentation. New York: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Dunlop, D.J., and West, G., 1969. An experimental evaluation of single‐domain theories. Reviews of Geophysics, 7: 709–757.Google Scholar
  5. Dunlop, D.J., and Argyle, K.S., 1997. Thermoremanence, anhysteretic remanence and susceptibility of submicron magnetites: nonlinear field dependence and variation with grain size. Journal of Geophysical Research, 102: 20199–20210.Google Scholar
  6. Dunlop, D.J., and Özdemir, Ö., 1997. Rock Magnetism: Fundamentals and Frontiers. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Egli, R., and Lowrie, W., 2002. Anhysteretic remanent magnetization of fine magnetic particles. Journal of Geophysical Research, 107(B10): 2209, doi:10.1029/2001JB0000671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gillingham, E.W., and Stacey, F.D., 1971. Anhysteretic remanent magnetization (ARM) in magnetite Grains. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 91: 160–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jackson, M.J., 1991. Anisotropy of magnetic remanence: a brief review of mineralogical sources, physical, origins, and applications and comparisons with susceptibility anisotropy. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 136: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jackson, M.J., Gruber, W., Marvin, J., and Banerjee, S.K., 1988. Partial anhysteretic remanence and its anisotropy: applications and grain size dependence. Geophysical Research Letters, 15: 440–443.Google Scholar
  11. Jackson, M.J., Banerjee, S.K., Marvin, J.A., Lu, R., and Gruber, W., 1991. Detrital remanence inclination errors and anhysteretic remanence anisotropy: quantitative model and experimental results. Geophysical Journal International, 104: 95–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jeap, W.F., 1971. Role of interactions in magnetic tapes. Journal of Applied Physics, 42: 2790–2794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Johnson, H.P., Lowrie, W., and Kent, D., 1975a. Stability of anhysteretic remanent magnetization in fine and coarse magnetite and maghemite particles. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 41: 1–10.Google Scholar
  14. Johnson, H.P., Kinoshita, H., and Merrill, 1975b. Rock magnetism and paleomagnetism of some North‐Pacific deep sea sediments. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 86: 412–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. King, J.W., Banerjee, S.K., and Marvin, J., 1983. A new rock‐magnetic approach to selecting samples for geomagnetic paleointensity studies: applications to paleointensity for the last 4000 years. Journal of Geophysical Research, 88: 5911–5921.Google Scholar
  16. Kono, M., 1978. Reliability of paleointensity methods using alternating field demagnetization and anhysteretic remanence. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 54: 241.Google Scholar
  17. Levi, S., and Banerjee, S.K., 1976. On the possibility of obtaining relative paleointensities from lake sediments. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 29: 219–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Levi, S., and Merrill, R.T., 1976. A comparison of ARM and TRM in magnetite. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 32: 171–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maher, B.A., 1988. Magnetic properties of some synthetic submicron magnetites. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 94: 83–96.Google Scholar
  20. McCabe, C., Jackson, M.J., and Ellwood, B.B., 1985. Magnetic anisotropy in the Trenton limestone: results of a new technique, anisotropy of anhysteretic susceptibility. Geophysical Research Letters, 12: 333–336.Google Scholar
  21. Oldfield, F., 1994. Toward the discrimination of fine grained ferrimagnets by magnetic measurements in lake and near‐shore marine sediments. Journal of Geophysical Research, 99: 9045–9050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rimbert, F., 1959. Contribution À L'étude De L'action De Champs Alternatifs Sur Les Aimantations Rémanentes Des Roches: Applications Géophysiques. Revue de l'Institut Francais du Petrole, 14: 17–54.Google Scholar
  23. Rolph, T.C., and Shaw, J., 1985. A new method of paleofield magnitude correction for the thermally altered samples and its applications to Lower Carboniferous lavas. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 80: 773–781.Google Scholar
  24. Shaw, J., 1974. A new method of determining the magnitude of the palaeomagnetic field: application to five historic lavas and five archaeological samples. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 39: 133–141.Google Scholar
  25. Sugiura, N., 1979. ARM, TRM and magnetic interactions: concentration dependence. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 42: 451–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tarling, D.H., and Hrouda, F., 1993. London: The Magnetic Anisotropy of Rocks, Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  27. Tauxe, L., 1993. Sedimentary records of relative paleointensity of the geomagnetic field: theory and practice. Reviews of Geophysics, 31: 319–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tauxe, L., 1998. Paleomagnetic Principles and Practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Tauxe, L., Pick, T., and Kok, Y.S., 1995. Relative paleointensity in sediments: a pseudo Thellier approach. Geophysical Research Letters, 22: 2885–2888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Valet, J‐P., 2003. Time variations in geomagnetic intensity. Reviews of Geophysics, 41(1): 1004, doi:10.1029/2001RG000104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Walton, D., 1990. A theory of anhysteretic remanent magnetization of single domain grains. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 87: 369–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wohlfarth, E.P., 1964. A review of the problem of fine‐particle interactions with special reference to magnetic recording. Journal of Applied Physics, 35: 783–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yu, Y., Dunlop, D.J., and Özdemir, Ö., 2002a. Partial anhysteretic remanent magnetization in magnetite: 1. Additivity. Journal of Geophysical Research, 107, 10.1029/2001JB001249.Google Scholar
  34. Yu, Y., Dunlop, D.J., and Özdemir, Ö., 2002b. Partial anhysteretic remanent magnetization in magnetite: 2. Reciprocity. Journal of Geophysical Research, 107, 10.1029/2001JB001269.Google Scholar
  35. Yu, Y., Dunlop, D.J., and Özdemir, Ö., 2003. Testing the independence law of partial ARMs: implications for paleointensity determination. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 208: 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruce M. Moskowitz

There are no affiliations available