Encyclopedia of Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism

2007 Edition
| Editors: David Gubbins, Emilio Herrero-Bervera

Magnetic Remanence, Anisotropy

  • Ann M. Hirt
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4423-6_182

It has been known since the early 1950s that rocks and sediments display a magnetic anisotropy when constituent mineral grains have a preferred orientation (Graham, 1954; Hargraves, 1959). Magnetic fabric is usually described by the anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS), measured in weak applied fields. With this method all minerals in a rock or sediment contribute to the susceptibility. Therefore, the observed anisotropy is the sum of the individual mineral components, their specific susc\eptibility anisotropy and their preferred alignment. Since nonferromagnetic matrix minerals often make up the bulk composition of a rock or sediments, the low‐field susceptibility of these minerals can dominate the measured signal. The anisotropy of magnetic remanence (AMR) is only dependent on the ferromagnetic grains (s.l.) in a rock. Since the number of different ferromagnetic phases is more limited, the source of the AMR is easier to distinguish, and the degree of anisotropy is less...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

  1. Borradaile, G.J., and Henry, B., 1997. Tectonic applications of magnetic susceptibility and its anisotropy. Earth‐Science Reviews, 42: 49–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cox, A., and Doell, R.R., 1967. Measurement of high‐coercivity magnetic anisotropy. In Collinson, D.W., Creer, K.M., and Runcorn, S.K. Methods in Paleomagnetism. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 477–482.Google Scholar
  3. de Wall, H., and Worm, H.‐U., 1993. Field dependence of magnetic anisotropy in pyrrhotite: effects of texture and grain shape. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 76: 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fuller, M.D., 1960. Anisotropy of susceptibility and the natural remanent magnetization of some Welsh slates. Nature, 186: 790–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Girdler, R.W., 1961. The measurement and computation of anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility of rocks. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 5: 34–45.Google Scholar
  6. Graham, J.W., 1954. Magnetic susceptibility anisotropy, an unexploited petrofabric element. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 65: 1257–1258.Google Scholar
  7. Hargraves, R.B., 1959. Magnetic anisotropy and remanent magnetization in hemo‐ilmenite ore deposits at Allard Lake, Quebec. Journal of Geophysical Research, 64: 1565–1578.Google Scholar
  8. Howell, L.G., Martinez, J.D., and Statham, E.H., 1958. Some observations on rock magnetism. Geophysics, 23: 285–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jackson, M., 1991. Anisotropy of magnetic remanence: a brief review of mineralogical sources, physical origins, and geological applications, and comparison with susceptibility anisotropy. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 136: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jackson, M.J., and Borradaile, G., 1991. On the origin of the magnetic fabric in purple Cambrian slates of north Wales. Tectonophysics, 194: 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jackson, M., Gruber, W., Marvin, J., and Banerjee, S.K., 1988. Partial anhysteretic remanence and its anisotropy: Applications and grain size‐dependence. Geophysical Research Letters, 15: 440–443.Google Scholar
  12. Jelinek, V., 1996. Theory and measurement of the anisotropy of isothermal remanent magnetization of rocks. Travaux Géophysique, 37: 124–134.Google Scholar
  13. McCabe, C., Jackson, M., and Ellwood, B.B., 1985. Magnetic anisotropy in the Trenton limestone: results of a new technique, anisotropy of anhysteretic susceptibility. Geophysical Research Letters, 12: 333–336.Google Scholar
  14. Nye, J.F., 1957. Physical Properties of Crystals. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Rochette, P., Jackson, M.J., and Aubourg, C., 1992. Rock magnetism and the interpretation of anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility. Reviews of Geophysics, 30: 209–226.Google Scholar
  16. Selkin, P.A., Gee, J.S., Tauxe, L., Meurer, W.P., and Newell, A.J., 2000. The effect of remanence anisotropy on paleointensity estimates: a case study from the Archean Stillwater Complex. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 183: 403–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Stacey, F.D., and Banerjee, S.K., 1974. The Physical Principles of Rock Magnetism. Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  18. Stephenson, A., Sadikun, S., and Potter, D.K., 1986. A theoretical and experimental comparison of the anisotropies of magnetic susceptibility and remanence in rocks and minerals. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 84: 185–200.Google Scholar
  19. Tauxe, L., Constable, C., Stokking, L., and Badgley, C., 1990. Use of anisotropy to determine the origin of characteristic remanent magnetization in the Siwalik red beds of northern Pakistan. Journal of Geophysical Research—Solid Earth and Planets, 95: 4391–4404.Google Scholar
  20. Tan, X.D., and Kodama, K.P., 2002. Magnetic anisotropy and paleomagnetic inclination shallowing in red beds: evidence from the Mississippian Mauch Chunk Formation, Pennsylvania. Journal of Geophysical Research—Solid Earth, 107(B11):2311, doi: 10.1029/2001JB001636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tarling, D.H., and Hrouda, F., 1993. The Magnetic Anisotropy of Rocks. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  22. Tauxe, L., 2002. Paleomagnetic Principles and Practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ann M. Hirt

There are no affiliations available