Encyclopedia of Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism

2007 Edition
| Editors: David Gubbins, Emilio Herrero-Bervera

Magnetic Proxy Parameters

  • M. J. Dekkers
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4423-6_181

Introduction

As a rule, a natural system is complex and the result of the interplay of numerous constituting parameters. To fully describe such systems, ideally each (independent) parameter must be known. However, their mere number would imply a substantial analytical operation and in practice one should look for parameters that describe the essential parts of the system. Because these parameters can only describe the system in an approximate fashion they are termed “proxy parameters” or “proxies.” There exists a myriad of proxies including the chemical analysis of inorganic or organic compounds, the number and types of living and fossil biota, and the physical properties of a sample, such as grain‐size distribution, porosity, magnetic properties, etc. Basically, each physical, chemical, or biological parameter that is measurable reasonably quickly at reasonable cost may serve as proxy to describe a complete system. One should realize that up to over several thousands of data points...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Bibliography

  1. Bloemendal, J., King, J.W., Hall, F.R., and Doh, S.‐J., 1992. Rock magnetism of Late Neogene and Pleistocene deep‐sea sediments: relationship to sediment source, diagenetic processes, and sediment lithology. Journal of Geophysical Research, 97: 4361–4375.Google Scholar
  2. Day, R., Fuller, M., and Schmidt, V.A., 1977. Hysteresis properties of titanomagnetites: grain‐size and compositional dependence. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 13: 260–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dekkers, M.J., Langereis, C.G., Vriend, S.P., van Santvoort, P.J.M., and de Lange, G.J., 1994. Fuzzy c‐means cluster analysis of early diagenetic effects on natural remanent magnetisation acquisition in a 1.1 Myr piston core from the Central Mediterranean. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 85: 155–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dekkers, M.J., and Pietersen, H.S., 1992. Magnetic properties of low‐Ca fly ash: a rapid tool for Fe‐assessment and a proxy for environmental hazard. In Glasser, F.P. et al. (eds.), Advanced Cementitious Systems: Mechanisms and Properties, Material Research Society Symposium Proceedings, 245: 37–47Google Scholar
  5. Dunlop, D.J., 2002. Theory and application of the Day plot (M rs/M s versus H cr/H c) 1. Theoretical curves and tests using titanomagnetite data. Journal of Geophysical Research, 107: doi: 10.1029/2001JB000486.Google Scholar
  6. Dunlop, D.J., and Özdemir, Ö., 1997. Rock Magnetism: Fundamentals and Frontiers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 573 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Egli, R., 2003. Analysis of the field dependence of remanent magnetisation curves. Journal of Geophysical Research, 108: doi:10.1029/2002JB002023.Google Scholar
  8. Egli, R., 2004. Characterization of individual rock magnetic components by analysis of remanence curves. 1. Unmixing natural sediments. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 48: 391–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Evans, M.E., and Heller, F., 2003. Environmental Magnetism—Principles and Applications of Enviromagnetics. San Diego: Academic Press, 299 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Hanesch, M., and Scholger, R., 2002. Mapping of heavy metal loadings in soils by means of magnetic susceptibility measurements. Environmental Geology, 42: 857–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hanesch, M., Scholger, R., and Rey, D., 2003. Mapping dust distribution around an industrial site by measuring magnetic parameters of tree leaves. Atmospheric Environment, 37: 5125–5133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heller F., and T.‐S., Liu 1982. Magnetostratigraphical dating of loess deposits in China. Nature, 300: 431–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heslop, D., Langereis, C.G., and Dekkers, M.J., 2000. A new astronomical timescale for the loess deposits of Northern China. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 184: 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Heslop, D., McIntosh, G., and Dekkers, M.J., 2004. Using time‐ and temperature‐dependent Preisach models to investigate the limitations of modelling isothermal remanent magnetization acquisition curves with cumulative log Gaussian functions. Geophysical Journal International, 157: 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hunt, C.P., Moskowitz, B.M., and Banerjee, S.K., 1995. Magnetic properties of rock and minerals. In Ahrens, T.J. (ed.), Rock Physics and Phase Relations: A Handbook of Physical Constants, Vol. 3.American Geophysical Union, pp. 189–204.Google Scholar
  16. Hunt, C.P., Banerjee, S.K., Han, J., Solheid, P.A., Oches, R., Sun, W., and Liu, T., 1995b. Rock‐magnetic properties of climate change in the loess‐paleosol sequences of the western Loess Plateau of China. Geophysical Journal International, 123: 232–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kruiver, P.P., Dekkers, M.J., and Heslop, D., 2001. Quantification of magnetic coercivity components by the analysis of acquisition curves of isothermal remanent magnetisation. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 189: 269–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kruiver, P.P., and Passier, H.F., 2001. Coercivity analysis of magnetic phases in sapropel S1 related to variations in redox conditions, including an investigation of the S‐ratio. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, 2(12): doi:10.1029/2001GC000181.Google Scholar
  19. Larrasoaña, J.C., Roberts, A.P., Stoner, J.S., Richter, C., and Wehausen, R., 2003a. A new proxy for bottom‐water ventilation in the eastern Mediterranean based on diagenetically controlled magnetic properties of sapropel‐bearing sediments. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology, 190: 221–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Larrasoaña, J.C., Roberts, A.P., Rohling, E.J., Winklhofer, M., and Wehausen, R., 2003b. Three million years of monsoon variability over the Northern Sahara. Climate Dynamics, 21: 689–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Laskar, J., 1990. The chaotic motion in the solar system: a numerical estimate of the size of the chaotic zones. Icarus, 88: 266–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Maher, B.A., and Thompson, R. (eds.), 1999. Quaternary Climates, Environments and Magnetism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 390 pp.Google Scholar
  23. Matzka, J., and Maher, B.A., 1999. Magnetic biomonitoring of roadside tree leaves: identification of spatial and temporal variations in vehicle‐derived particulates. Atmospheric Environment, 33: 4565–4569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Morris, W.A., Versteeg, J.K., Bryant, D.W., Legzdins, A.E., McCarry, B.E., and Marvin, C.H., 1995. Preliminary comparisons between mutagenicity and magnetic susceptibility of respirable airborne particulate. Atmospheric Environment, 29: 3441–3450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Muxworthy, A.R., Schmidbauer, E., and Petersen, N., 2002. Magnetic properties and Mössbauer spectra of urban atmospheric particulate matter: a case study from Munich, Germany. Geophysical Journal International, 150: 558–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Passier, H.F., de Lange, G.J., and Dekkers, M.J., 2001. Rock‐magnetic properties and geochemistry of the active oxidation front and the youngest sapropel in the Mediterranean. Geophysical Journal International, 145: 604–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pike, C.R., Roberts, A.P., and Verosub, K.L., 1999. Characterizing interactions in fine magnetic particle systems using first order reversal curves. Journal of Applied Physics, 85: 6660–6667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Roberts, A.P., Pike, C.R., and Verosub, K.L., 2000. FORC diagrams: a new tool for characterizing the magnetic properties of natural samples. Journal of Geophysical Research, 105: 28461–28475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Robertson, D.J., and France, D.E., 1994. Discrimination of remanence‐carrying minerals in mixtures, using isothermal remanent magnetisation acquisition curves. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 82: 223–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Robinson, S., 1986. The late Pleistocene palaeoclimatic record of North Atlantic deep‐sea sediments revealed by mineral‐magnetic measurements. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 42: 22–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stoner, J.S., Channell, J.E.T., and Hillaire‐Marcel, C., 1996. The magnetic signature of rapidly deposited detrital layers from the deep Labrador Sea: relationship to North Atlantic Heinrich Layers, Paleoceanography, 11: 309–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Thompson, R., Bloemendal, J., Dearing, J.A., Oldfield, F., Rummery, T.A., Stober, J.C., and Turner, G.M., 1980. Environmental applications of magnetic measurements. Science, 207: 481–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Van Oorschot, I.H.M., Dekkers, M.J., and Havlicek, P., 2002. Selective dissolution of magnetic iron oxides with the acid‐ammonium‐oxalate/ferrous‐iron extraction technique‐II. Natural loess and palaeosol samples. Geophysical Journal International, 149: 106–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Xie, S., Dearing, J.A., Boyle, J.F., Bloemendal, J., and Morse, A.P., 2001. Association between magnetic properties and element concentrations of Liverpool street dust and its implications. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 48: 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. J. Dekkers

There are no affiliations available