Encyclopedia of Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism

2007 Edition
| Editors: David Gubbins, Emilio Herrero-Bervera

Magnetic Anomalies, Long Wavelength

  • Michael E. Purucker
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4423-6_172
Long‐wavelength anomalies are static or slowly varying features of the geomagnetic field, and originate largely within the lithosphere. These anomalies stand in contrast to the rapidly time varying features characteristic of even longer wavelengths, which originate within the outer core. An inflection point, or change of slope, in the geomagnetic power spectrum (Figure M6) can be seen at degree 13 and is a manifestation of the relatively sharp transition from core‐dominated processes to lithospheric‐dominated processes. Long‐wavelength anomalies (Figure M7a/Plate 5c) are most easily recognized from near‐Earth satellites at altitudes of 350–750 km, and these altitudes define the shortest wavelengths traditionally associated with such geomagnetic features. The lithospheric origin of these features was firmly established by comparison with the marine magnetic record of seafloor spreading in the North Atlantic (LaBrecque and Raymond, 1985). Virtually identical features have now been...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Dyment, J., and Arkani‐Hamed, J., 1998. Contribution of lithospheric remanent magnetization to satellite magnetic anomalies over the world's oceans. Journal of Geophysical Research, 103: 15423–15441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fox Maule, C., Purucker, M., Olsen, N., and Mosegaard, K., 2005. Heat flux anomalies in Antarctica revealed by satellite magnetic data. Science, 10.1126/science.1106888.Google Scholar
  3. Grammatica, N., and Tarits, P., 2002. Contribution at satellite altitude of electromagnetically induced anomalies arising from a three‐dimensional heterogeneously conducting Earth, using SQ as an inducing source field. Geophysical Journal International, 151: 913–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. LaBrecque, J.L., and Raymond, C.A., 1985. Seafloor spreading anomalies in the MAGSAT field of the North Atlantic. Journal of Geophysical Research, 90: 2565–2575.Google Scholar
  5. Langel, R.A., and Hinze, W.J., 1998. The Magnetic Field of the Earth's Lithosphere. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Langlais, B., Purucker, M., and Mandea, M., 2004. Crustal magnetic field of Mars. Journal of Geophysical Research, 109: E02008, doi:10.1029/2003JE002048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Maus, S., and Haak, V., 2003. Magnetic field annihilators: invisible magnetisation at the magnetic equator. Geophysical Journal International, 155: 509–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Nataf, H., and Ricard, Y., 1996. 3SMAC: an a priori tomographic model of the upper mantle based on geophysical modeling. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 95: 101–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Purucker, M., Langlais, B., Olsen, N., Hulot, G., and Mandea, M., 2002. The southern edge of cratonic North America: evidence from new satellite magnetometer observations. Geophysical Research Letters, 29(15): 8000, doi:10.1029/2001GL013645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sabaka, T.J., Olsen, N., and Purucker, M., 2004. Extending comprehensive models of the Earth's magnetic field with Ørsted and CHAMP data. Geophysical Journal International, 159: 521–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Vivier, F., Maier‐Reimer, E., and Tyler, R.H., 2004. Simulations of magnetic fields generated by the Antarctic Circumpolar Current at satellite altitude: can geomagnetic measurements be used to monitor the flow? Geophysical Research Letters, 31: L10306, doi:10.1029/2004GL019804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael E. Purucker

There are no affiliations available