Skip to main content

Risk Governance

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Natural Hazards

Part of the book series: Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series ((EESS))

Definition

Modern social systems are characterized by complex patterns of interdependencies between actors, institutions, functional activities, and spatial organizations. Controlling, managing, or even steering the complex, fragmented, and often competing societal interests is beyond the capacity of the state as an agent of authority. This is important for dealing with risks, in particular in cases of high uncertainty and ambiguity (Klinke and Renn, 2002).

The term “governance” in its widest sense can be understood as the following. At the national level, it characterizes the structure and processes for collective decision making involving governmental and non-governmental actors (Nye and Donahue, 2000). At the global level, “governance embodies a horizontally organized structure of functional self-regulation encompassing state and non-state actors bringing about collectively binding decision without superior authority” (see Rosenau, 1992; Wolf, 2002).

This understanding can also be...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Armaş, J., and Avram, E., 2009. Perception of flood risk in Danube Delta, Romania. Natural Hazards, 50(2), 269–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audit Commission, 2000. Management Paper on Target the Practice of Performance Indicators. London: Audit Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubreuil, G. H., Bengtsson, G., Bourrelier, P. H., Foster, R., Gadbois, S., and Kelly, G. N., 2002. A report of TRUSTNET on risk governance – lessons learned. Journal of Risk Research, 5(1), 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission, 2001. European Governance – A White Paper. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission, 2007. Territorial Agenda of the European Union. Brussels: European commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Communities, 2001. Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment. OJ L 197, 21.7.2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Communities, 2007. DIRECTIVE 2007/60/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks. Official Journal of the European Union L 288/27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, S., 2009. Susceptibility versus resilience to mountain hazards in Austria – paradigms of vulnerability revisited. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 9, 337–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, S., Heiss, K., and Hübl, J., 2007. Towards an empirical vulnerability function for use in debris flow risk assessment. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 7, 495–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gambetta, D. (ed.), 2000. Can We Trust Trust?. Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations. University of Oxford – Department of Sociology, 213–217. http://www.sociology.ox.ac.uk/papers/gambetta213-237.pdf.

  • Greiving, S., Fleischhauer, M., and Wanczura, S., 2006. Management of natural hazards in Europe: the role of spatial planning in selected EU Member States. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 49(5), 739–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IRGC – International Risk Governance Council, 2005. White Paper on Risk Governance: Towards an Integrative Approach. Geneva: IRGC.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (ISDR), 2005. Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-1015: Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters, Tech. Report, World Conference on Disaster Reduction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinke, A., and Renn, O., 2002. A new approach to risk evaluation and management: risk-based, precaution-based and discourse-based strategies. Risk Analysis, 22, 1071–1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Löfstedt, R., 2005. Risk Management in Post-Trust Societies. Basingstoke/Hampshire/New York: Houndmills.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. S. Jr., and Donahue, J. d. (eds.), 2000. Governance in a globalizing world. Cambridge, Mass: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton, D., Millar, M., and Johnston, D., 2001. Community resilience to volcanic hazard consequences. Natural Hazards, 24(2), 157–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J. N., 1992. Governance, order, and change in world politics. In Rosenau, J. N., and Czempiel, E. O. (eds.), Governance Without Government. Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–29.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., 1999. Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. Risk Analysis, 19(4), 689–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soil Thematic Strategy, 2006. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection [SEC(2006)620] [SEC(2006)1165].

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanczura, S., Fleischhauer, M., Greiving, S., Fourman, M., Sucker, K., d’Andrea, A., 2007. Analysis of recent EU, international and national research and policy activities in the field of risk governance. Del. 1.1 MIDIR Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • WBGU – German Advisory Council on Global Change, 2000. World in Transition: Strategies for Managing Global Environmental Risks. Annual Report 1998. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiland, U., 1999. Indikatoren einer nachhaltigen Entwicklung – vom Monitoring zur politischen Steuerung? In Weiland, U. (ed.), Perspektiven der Raum- und Umweltplanung – angesichts Globalisierung, Europäischer Integration und Nachhaltiger Entwicklung. Berlin: Verlag für Wissenschaft und Forschung, pp. 245–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, K. D., 2002. Contextualizing normative standards for legitimate governance beyond the state. In Grote, J. R., and Gbikpi, B. (eds.), Participatory Governance. Political and Societal Implications. Opladen: Leske + Budrich, pp. 35–50.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Greiving .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this entry

Cite this entry

Greiving, S., Glade, T. (2013). Risk Governance. In: Bobrowsky, P.T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Natural Hazards. Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4399-4_298

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics