Encyclopedia of Natural Hazards

2013 Edition
| Editors: Peter T. Bobrowsky

Land-Use Planning

  • Stefan Greiving
  • Philipp Schmidt-Thomé
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4399-4_209

Synonyms

City planning; Regional planning; Spatial planning; Territorial development; Town and country planning

Definition

Land-use planning is defined as the whole comprehensive, coordinating planning at all scales (from national to local), which aims at an efficient and balanced territorial development.

Introduction: natural hazards and their relevance for land-use planning

Natural hazards are usually defined as extreme natural events that have the potential to damage societies and individuals. These extreme events occur in closed time spans of seconds or weeks, after which the initial state before the extreme event is sometimes reached again. Longer lasting natural processes, such as climate change and desertification, might pose certain threats or trigger hazards, but do not belong to hazards sensu stricto. Most natural hazards arise from the normal physical processes operating in the Earth’s interior, at its surface, or within its enclosing atmosphere (Schmidt-Thomé, 2006).

“Land-u...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Berg, M., et al., 1995. Was ist ein Schaden? Zur normativen Dimension des Schadensbegriffs in der Risikowissenschaft. Zürich: Verlag der Fachvereine.Google Scholar
  2. Burby, R. J. (ed.), 1998. Cooperating with Nature: Confronting Natural Hazards with Land-Use Planning for Sustainable Communities. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.Google Scholar
  3. Egli, T., 1996. Hochwasserschutz und Raumplanung: Schutz vor Naturgefahren mit Instrumenten der Raumplanung – dargestellt am Beispiel von Hochwasser und Murgängen. vdf – Hochschulverlag, ORL-Bericht: Zürich, Vol. 100.Google Scholar
  4. European Commission (EU) 2009. Staff working document accompanying the white paper adapting to climate change: towards a European framework for action impact assessment. Brussels.Google Scholar
  5. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) (ed.), 1997. Strategic Plan – Partnership for a Safer Future. Washington, DC: FEMA.Google Scholar
  6. Fleischhauer, M., Greiving, S., and Wanczura, S. (eds.), 2006. Natural Hazards and Spatial Planning in Europe. Dortmund: Dortmunder Vertrieb für Bau- und Planungsliteratur.Google Scholar
  7. Godschalk, D. R., et al., 1999. Natural Hazard Mitigation – Recasting Disaster Policy and Planning. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  8. Greiving, S., 2002. Räumliche Planung und Risiko. München: Gerling Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
  9. Greiving, S., 2004. Risk assessment and management as an Important Tool for the EU Strategic Environmental Assessment. DISP, 157, 11–17.Google Scholar
  10. Greiving, S., and Fleischhauer, M. 2006. Spatial planning response towards natural and technological hazards. In Schmidt-Thomé, P. (ed.), Natural and technological hazards and risks affecting the spatial development of European regions. Geological Survey of Finland, Special Paper 42, Espoo 2006.Google Scholar
  11. International Risk Governance Council (IRGC), 2005. Basic concepts of risk characterisation and risk governance, IRGC: Geneva. Available at: (http://www.irgc.org/_cgidata/mhscms/_images/12395-3-1.pdf). 4 pp.
  12. Lass, W., Reusswig, F., and Kühn, K. D., 1998. Disaster Vulnerability and “Sustainable Development”. In Integrating Disaster Vulnerability in the CSD’s List of Indicators: Measuring Sustainable Development in Germany. Bonn: IDNDR, p. 14e.Google Scholar
  13. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (OPDM), 2005. Polycentricity scoping study. Glossary. Available at: http://www.odpm.gov.uk/index.asp?id=1145459.
  14. Rawls, J., 1971. A Theory of Justice. New York: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Ribeiro, M., Losenno, C., Dworak, T., Massey, E., Swart, R., Benzie, M., and Laaser, C. 2009. Design of guidelines for the elaboration of regional climate change adaptations strategies. Study for European Commission – DG Environment – Tender DG ENV. G.1/ETU/2008/0093r. Vienna: Ecologic Institute.Google Scholar
  16. Schmidt-Thomé, P. (ed.), 2006. Natural and technological hazards and risks affecting the spatial development of European regions. Geological Survey of Finland, Special Paper 42.Google Scholar
  17. Schmidt-Thomé, P., and Greiving, S., 2008. Response to natural hazards and climate change in Europe. In Faludi, A. (ed.), European Spatial Planning and Research. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute for Land Policy.Google Scholar
  18. Swart, R., Biesbroek, R., Binnerup, R., Carter, T. R., Cowan, C., Henrichs, T., Loquen, S., Mela, H., Morecroft, M., Reese, M., and Rey, D., 2009. Europe Adapts to Climate Change – Comparing National Adaptation Strategies. Online available: http://peer-initiative.org/media/m256_PEER_Report1.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IRPUD Institute of Spatial PlanningTU Dortmund UniversityDortmundGermany
  2. 2.Geological Survey of Finland (GTK)EspooFinland