Encyclopedia of Natural Hazards

2013 Edition
| Editors: Peter T. Bobrowsky

Emergency Mapping

  • Frank FiedrichEmail author
  • Sisi Zlatanova
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4399-4_115

Synonyms

Crisis mapping

Definition

The term “Emergency mapping” refers to the creation and use of maps – paper or digital – before, during or after emergencies and disasters. While “hazard and risk mapping” is primarily used to visualize the hazards and risks during the pre-event phase, “emergency mapping” focuses on supporting response and relief efforts. Nevertheless, both types of maps are closely related to one another since hazard and risk maps can be included into emergency maps as important components. Currently “Geographic(al) Information Systems” (GIS) play a critical role in the development and use of these maps. GIS-based emergency maps are often an integral part of web-enabled crisis information management systems.

Introduction

Successful emergency management would not be possible without maps. Emergency maps visualize vital spatial information for planning and response through an easily understandable mean. One of the well-known early examples of emergency maps is the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Andrienko, G., and Andrienko, N., 2005. Visual exploration of the spatial distribution of temporal behaviors. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Visualisation. Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society, pp. 799–806.Google Scholar
  2. Amdahl, G., 2001. Disaster Response: GIS for Public Safety. Redlands, CA: ESRI press. 108p.Google Scholar
  3. American National Standards Institute, International Committee for Information Technology Standards (ANSI/INCITS), 2006. Homeland Security Mapping Standard – Point Symbology for Emergency Management ANSI/INCITS 415-2006.Google Scholar
  4. Board on Natural Disasters, National Research Council, 1999. Reducing Disaster Losses Through Better Information. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brecht, H., 2008. The application of geo-technologies after the hurricane Katrina. In Nayak, S., and Zlatanova, S. (eds.), Remote Sensing and GIS Technologies for Monitoring and Prediction of Disasters. Berlin: Springer, pp. 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Committee on Planning for Catastrophe, National Research Council, 2007. Successful Response Starts with a Map: Improving Geospatial Support for Disaster Management. Washington, DC: Committee on Planning for Catastrophe: A Blueprint for Improving Geospatial Data, Tools, and Infrastructure, The National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dymon, J. D., and Winter, N. L., 1993. Evacuation mapping: the utility of guidelines. Disasters, 17(1), 12–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Greene, R. W., 2002. Confronting Catastrophe: A GIS Handbook. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press. 140 p.Google Scholar
  9. Heide, J. van der, and van ’t Hullenaar, B., 2007. Simbolenset voor rampenbestrijding and grootschalig optreden, Eindrapport RGI-210, 33 p. Avaible from World Wide Web: http://kennis.rgi.nl (in dutch)
  10. Jern, M., Brezzi, M., and Lundblad, P., 2010. Geovisual analytics tools for communicating emergency and early warning. In Konecny, M., Zlatanova, S., and Bandrova, T. L. (eds.), Geographic Information and Cartography for Risk and Crisis Management: Towards better solutions. Berlin: Springer, pp. 379–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kevany, M., 2008. Improving geospatial information in disaster management through action on lessons learned from major events. In Zlatanova, S., and Li, J. (eds.), Geospatial Information Technology for Emergency Response. London/Leiden: Taylor & Francis. ISPRS book series, pp. 3–19.Google Scholar
  12. Kerle, N., Heuel, S., and Pfeifer, N., 2008. Real-time data collection and information integration using airborne sensors. In Zlatanova, S., and Li, J. (eds.), Geospatial Information Technology for Emergency Response. London, UK: Taylor & Francis, pp. 43–74.Google Scholar
  13. Konecny, M., Zlatanova, S., and Bandrova, T. (eds.), 2010. Geographic Information and Cartography for Risk and Crisis Management: Towards Better Solutions. Heidelberg/Dordrecht/London/New York: Springer, p. 446.Google Scholar
  14. Lapierre, A., and Cote, P., 2008. Using Open Web Services for urban data management: a testbed, resulting from an OGC initiative for offering standard CAD/GIS/BIM services. In Coors, V., Rumors, M., Fendel, E. M., and Zlatanova, S. (eds.), Urban and Regional Data Management, UDMS Annual 2007. London: Taylor & Francis, pp. 381–393.Google Scholar
  15. Lee, J., 2007. A three-dimensional navigable data model to support emergency response in microspatial built-environments. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97(3), 512–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li, J., Zlatanova, S., and Fabbri, A. (eds.), 2007. Geomatics Solutions for Disaster Management. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. 444 p.Google Scholar
  17. Nayak, S., and Zlatanova, S. (eds.), 2008. Remote Sensing and GIS Technologies for Monitoring and Prediction of Disasters. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. 271 p.Google Scholar
  18. Oosterom, P., Zlatanova, S., and Fendel, E. M. (eds.), 2005. Geo-information for Disaster Management. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer. 1434 p.Google Scholar
  19. Rodarmel, C., Scott, L., Simerlink, D., and Walker, J., 2003. Multisensor fusion over the World Trade Center disaster site. Optical Engineering, 41(9), 2120–2128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Snow, J., 1855. On the Mode of Communication of Cholera. London: John Churchill.Google Scholar
  21. SKK (Ständige Konferenz für Katastrophenvorsorge und Katastrophenschutz), 2003. Taktische Zeichen: Vorschlag einer Dienstvorschrift DV 102, SKK, Cologne.Google Scholar
  22. Thomas, J., and Cook, K., 2005. Illuminating the Path: The Research and Development Agenda for Visual Analytics. Available from World Wide Web: http://nvac.pnl.gov/.
  23. Todin, E., Catelli, C., and Pani, G., 2004. FLOODSS, flood operational DSS. In Balabanis, P., Bronstert, A., Casale, R., and Samuels, P. (eds.), Ribamod: River Basin Modelling, Management and Flood Mitigation. Luxembourg: European Commission, Directorate-General Science, Research and Development, Environment and Climate Programme.Google Scholar
  24. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (U.S. DHS), Federal Emergency Management Agency Region IX and Governor’s Office of Emergency Services, 2008. California Catastrophic Incident Base Plan: Concept of Operations.Google Scholar
  25. Zhang, X., Zhang, J., Kuenzer, C., Voigt, S., and Wagner, W., 2004. Capability evaluation of 3-5 micrometer and 8-12.5 micrometer airborne thermal data for underground coal fire detection. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25(12), 2245–2258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhang, Y., and Kerle, N., 2008. Satellite remote sensing for near-real time data collection. In Zlatanova, S., and Li, J. (eds.), Geospatial Information Technology for Emergency Response. London: Taylor & Francis, pp. 75–102.Google Scholar
  27. Zlatanova, S., and Li, J. (eds.), 2008. Geospatial Information Technology for Emergency Response. London: Taylor & Francis. 381 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Public Safety and Emergency Management, Faculty D “Safety Engineering”Wuppertal UniversityWuppertalGermany
  2. 2.GIS Technology / Research Institute for the Built EnvironmentDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands