Skip to main content

Antidumping

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

Abstract

Antidumping refers to a legal statute that allows for a remedy (typically an import duty) to offset the effects of dumped imports. Under the General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs/World Trade Organization (GATT/ WTO) rules, two tests must be satisfied before a country may impose an antidumping duty on subject imports. First, the imports must be shown to be sold at price that is ‘less than fair value’. Second, the dumped imports must be shown to have caused or threaten to cause ‘material’ injury to a domestic industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Anderson, J.E. 1992. Domino dumping I: competitive exporters. American Economic Review 82, 65–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.E. 1993. Domino dumping II: anti-dumping. Journal of International Economics 35, 133–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belderbos, R.A. 1997. Antidumping and tariff jumping: Japanese firms. DFI in the European Union and the United States. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 133, 419–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blonigen, B.A. 2002. Tariff-jumping antidumping duties. Journal of International Economics 57, 31–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blonigen, B.A. 2006. Evolving discretionary practices of U.S. antidumping activity. Canadian Journal of Economics 39, 874–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blonigen, B.A. and Bown, C.P. 2003. Antidumping and retaliation threats. Journal of International Economics 60, 249–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blonigen, B.A. and Haynes, S.E. 2002. Antidumping investigations and the pass-through of exchange rates and antidumping duties. American Economic Review 92, 1044–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blonigen, B.A. and Ohno, Y. 1998. Endogenous protection, foreign direct investment, and protection-building trade. Journal of International Economics 46, 205–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blonigen, B.A. and Park, J.-H. 2004. Dynamic pricing in the presence of antidumping policy: theory and evidence. American Economic Review 94, 134–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blonigen, B.A. and Prusa, T.J. 2003. Antidumping. In Handbook of International Economics, ed. E. Kwan Choi and J. Harrigan. Maiden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blonigen, B.A., Tomlin, K. and Wilson, W.W. 2004. Tariff-jumping FDI and domestic firms’ profits. Canadian Journal of Economics 37, 656–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassing, J. and To, T. 2004. Antidumping, signaling and cheap talk. Working paper, Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarida, R.H. 1996. Dumping in theory, in policy, and in practice. In Fair Trade and Harmonization, ed. J. Bhagwati and R. Hudec. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVault, J.M. 1993. Economics and the international trade commission. Southern Economic Journal 60, 463–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ethier, W.J. and Fischer, R.D. 1987. The new protectionism. Journal of International Economic Integration 2, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finger, J.M. 1993. Antidumping: How It Works and Who Gets Hurt. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, R.D. 1992. Endogenous probability of protection and firm behavior. Journal of International Economics 32, 149–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallaway, M.P., Blonigen, B.A. and Flynn, J.E. 1999. Welfare osts of US antidumping and countervailing duty laws. Journal of International Economics 49, 211–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Antidumping Database. Online. Available at http://people.brandeis.edu/~cbown/global_ad, accessed 12 May 2007.

  • Hansen, W.L. and Prusa, T.J. 1996. Cumulation and ITC decision making: the sum of the parts is greater than the whole. Economic Inquiry 34, 746–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, W.L. and Prusa, T.J. 1997. The economics and politics of trade policy: an empirical analysis of ITC decision making. Review of International Economics 5, 230–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartigan, J.C., Kamma, S. and Perry, RR. 1989. The injury determination category and the value of relief from dumping. Review of Economics and Statistics 71, 183–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, D.A. 2005. The rise of U.S. antidumping activity in historical perspective. The World Economy 28, 651–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konings, J. and Vandenbussche, H. 2005. Antidumping protection and markups of domestic firms. Journal of International Economics 65, 151–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messerlin, RA. 1989. The EC antidumping regulations: a first economic appraisal, 1980–85. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 125, 563–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miranda, J., Torres, R.A. and Ruiz, M. 1998. The international use of antidumping: 1987–1997. Journal of World Trade 32, 5–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M.O. 1992. Rules or politics? An empirical analysis of ITC anti-dumping decisions. Economic Inquiry 30, 449–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prusa, T.J. 1992. Why are so many antidumping petitions withdrawn? Journal of International Economics 33, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prusa, T.J. 1994. Pricing behavior in the presence of antidumping law. Journal of Economic Integration 9, 260–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prusa, T.J. 1997. The trade effects of US antidumping actions. In The Effects of US Trade Protection and Promotion Policies, ed. R.C. Feenstra. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prusa, T.J. 2001. On the spread and impact of antidumping. Canadian Journal of Economics 34, 591–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitzes, J.D. 1993. Antidumping policy. International Economic Review 34, 745–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staiger, R.W. and Wolak, F.A. 1989. Strategic use of antidumping law to enforce tacit international collusion. Working Paper, No. 3016. Cambridge, MA: NBER.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Staiger, R.W. and Wolak, F.A. 1992. The effect of domestic antidumping law in the presence of foreign monopoly. Journal of International Economics 32, 265–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staiger, R.W. and Wolak, F.A. 1994. Measuring industry specific protection: antidumping in the United States. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics 1994, 51–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J.E. 1997. Dumping on free trade: the US import trade laws. Southern Economic Journal 64, 402–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C.T. 2004. The economic effects of withdrawn antidumping investigations: is there evidence of collusive settlements? Journal of International Economics 62, 295–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tharakan, P.K.M., Greenaway, D. and Tharakan, J. 1998. Cumulation and injury determination of the European community in antidumping cases. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 134, 320–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Database. Online. Available at http://darkwing.uoregon.eduz/~bruceb/adpage.html, accessed 12 May 2007.

  • Veugelers, R. and Vandenbussche, H. 1999. European anti-dumping policy and the profitability of national and international collusion. European Economic Review 47, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanardi, M. 2004. Antidumping law as a collusive device. Canadian Journal of Economics 37, 95–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Steven N. Durlauf Lawrence E. Blume

Copyright information

© 2008 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this entry

Cite this entry

Blonigen, B.A., Prusa, T.J. (2008). Antidumping. In: Durlauf, S.N., Blume, L.E. (eds) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-58802-2_46

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-58802-2_46

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-78676-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-58802-2

Publish with us

Policies and ethics