Skip to main content

Driver Behavior Modeling

  • Reference work entry
Handbook of Intelligent Vehicles

Abstract

In this chapter, the author presents a general framework classifying the different models adopted for capturing driver behavior focusing on the human cognitive dimensions and the traffic decision-making dimensions. Special interest is directed toward the “lower-level” microscopic models that can be linked directly to two core driving assistance technologies: adaptive cruise controls and lane-departure warning systems. These “lower-level” models are classified either as acceleration models or as lane changing models.

Acceleration models are at the core of operational driving behaviors, and include car-following models which capture interactions between a lead vehicle and following vehicles. The main assumption in these models is that the behavior of the following vehicle is directly related to a stimulus observed/perceived by the driver, defined relative to the lead vehicle. In addition to the operational aspect, lane changing models capture the tactical side of driving. Most lane changing models have followed a deterministic rule-based framework where changing lanes is directly related to the desirability of such maneuver, its necessity, and its possibility/safety. Recognizing the limitations of the major existing microscopic traffic models, the objective in this chapter is to advance the state of knowledge in modeling driver behavioral processes and to offer an insight into current modeling approaches and the corresponding advantages and disadvantages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahmed KI (1999) Modeling driver’s acceleration and lane changing behaviors. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bando M, Hasebe K, Nakayama A, Shibata A, Sugiyama Y (1995) Dynamical model of traffic congestion and numerical simulation. Phys Rev E 51:1035–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva ME, Lerman SR (1985) Discrete choice analysis. MIT Press, Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Boer ER (1999) Car following from the driver’s perspective. Transportation Research Board, Part F 2(4):201–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brackston M, McDonald M (1999) Car-following: a historical review. Transportation Research, Part F 2(4):181–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler R, Herman R, Montroll W (1958) Traffic dynamics: studies in car-following. Oper Res 6:165–184

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Edie LC (1961) Car-following and steady-state theory for non-congested traffic. Oper Res 9:66–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • FHWA (2004) NGSIM Task E.1-1: core algorithms assessment, final report, Cambridge Systematic, Inc., Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazis DC, Herman R, Potts R (1959) Car-following theory of steady state traffic flow. Oper Res 7:499–505

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gazis D, Herman R, Rothery R (1961) Nonlinear follow-the-leader models of traffic flow. Oper Res 9:545–567

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gipps PG (1981) A behavioral car-following model for computer simulation. Transportation Research 15B:101–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Gipps PG (1986) A model for the structure of lane changing decisions. Transportation Research 20B:403–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamdar SH, Mahmassani HS (2008) From existing accident-free car-following models to colliding vehicles: exploration and assessment, National Research Council (US). Transportation Research Board Meeting, Washington, DC, 87th January 2008. Preprint CD-ROM

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastie R, Dawes RM (2001) Rational choice in an uncertain world. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Helbing D, Farkas I, Vicsek T (2000) Simulating dynamical features of escape panic. Nature 406:487–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidas P (2002) Modeling lane-changing and merging in microscopic traffic simulation. Transportation Research, Part C 10(2):351–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kesting A, Treiber M, Helbing D (2007) MOBIL: general lane changing model for car-following models. Transportation Research Record 1999/2007:86–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krauss S, Wagner P (1997) Metastable states in a microscopic model of traffic flow. Phys Rev E 55(5):5597–5602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krauss S, Wagner P, Gawron C (1996) Continuous limit of Nagel-Shreckenberg model. Phys Rev E 54(4):3707–3712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel K, Shreckenberg M (1992) A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic. J Phys I (France) 2:2221–2229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Highway Traffic Safety (1998) Aggressive driving; help get the world out, US. DOT. http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS3277. Accessed December, 2004

  • Newel G (1961) Nonlinear effects in the dynamics of car-following. Oper Res 9:209–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranney TA (1999) Psychological factors that influence car-following and car-following model development. Transportation Research, Part F 2(4):213–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothery RW (1999) Traffic flow theory: A state-of-the-Art report-revised monograph on traffic flow theory. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt LJ, Warner B (2002) Panic: origins, insight, and treatment. North Atlantic Books, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz DP (1964) Panic behavior, discussion and readings. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tadaki S, Nishinari K, Kikuchi M, Sugiyama Y, Yukawa S (2002) Analysis of congested flow at the upper stream of a tunnel. Physica A 315:156–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilch B, Helbing D (1998) Generalized force model of traffic dynamics. Phys Rev E 58:133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treiber M, Hennecke K, Helbing D (2000) Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations. Phys Rev E 2(2):1805–1824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treiber M, Kesting A, Helbing D (2006) Delays, inaccuracies and anticipation in microscopic traffic models. Physica A 360:71–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallsten TS, Pleskac TJ, Lejuez CW (2005) Modeling behavior in a clinically diagnostic sequential risk-taking task. Psychol Rev 112(4):862–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiedemann R, Reiter U, (1992) Microscopic traffic simulation, the simulation system mission. Project ICARUS (V1052) Final Report, CEC, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samer Hamdar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag London Ltd.

About this entry

Cite this entry

Hamdar, S. (2012). Driver Behavior Modeling. In: Eskandarian, A. (eds) Handbook of Intelligent Vehicles. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-085-4_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics