International Encyclopedia of Civil Society

2010 Edition
| Editors: Helmut K. Anheier, Stefan Toepler

Civil Society and Social Capital in Scandinavia

  • Karl Henrik Sivesind
  • Per Selle
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-93996-4_740

Introduction

The Scandinavian countries, Sweden, Norway, and Denmark, are characterized by high levels of trust, volunteering, participation in voluntary organizations and a political culture that combines equality, national solidarity, and individual autonomy. The Scandinavian countries are in many comparative studies ranked on top when it comes to social capital (Rothstein, 2002), organizational participation (Dekker & van den Broek, 1998), and civil society’s vitality (Salamon et al., 2004). The popular movements have been important for the development of these characteristics. The first part of the article goes through some common features in Scandinavian history. The second part looks at volunteering, social trust and civic engagement in recent studies. In the last part theoretical explanations of the findings are examined.

Civil Society

Civil society, through voluntary associations and popular movements, has played a significant and distinctive role in the building of democracy,...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References/Further Readings

  1. Dekker, P., & van den Broek, A. (1998). Civil society in comparative perspective: Involvement in voluntary associations in North America and Western Europe. Voluntas, 9, 10–38.Google Scholar
  2. Fridberg, T., & Kangas, O. (2008). Social capital. In H. Ervasti, T. Fridberg, M. Hjerm, & K. Ringdal (Eds.), Nordic social attitudes in a European perspective (pp. 65–85) Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  3. Fridberg, T., Koch-Nielsen, I., & Henriksen, L. S. (2006). Frivilligt arbejde. In T. P. Boje, T. Fridberg, & B. Ibsen (Eds.), Frivillighed og nonprofit i Danmark. Omfang, organisation, økonomi og beskæftigelse SFI-rapport 06:19 (pp. 41–70). København, Denmark: Socialforskningsinstiuttet.Google Scholar
  4. Grendstad, G., Selle, P., Strømsnes, K., & Bortne, Ø. (2006). Unique environmentalism. A comparative perspective. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Hrafnsdóttir, S. (2006). The Icelandic Voluntary Sector. Development of research. In A.-L. Matthies (Ed.), Nordic civic society organisations and the future of welfare services – a model for Europe? TemaNord 2006:517. Copenhagen, Denmark: The Nordic Council of Ministers.Google Scholar
  6. Koch-Nielsen, I., Henriksen, L. S., Fridberg, T., & Rosendahl, D. (2005). Frivilligt arbejde – Den frivillige indsats i Danmark Rapport 05:20. København, Denmark: Socialforskningsinstitutet.Google Scholar
  7. Kuhnle, S., & Selle, P. (1990). Meting needs in a welfare state: Relations between government and voluntary organizations in Norway. In A. Ware & R. E. Goodin (Eds.), Needs and welfare (pp. 165–184). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Kuhnle, S., & Selle, P. (1992). Government and voluntary organizations: A relational perspective. In S. Kuhnle & P. Selle (Eds.), Government and voluntary organizations. A relational perspective (pp. 1–33). London: Avebury.Google Scholar
  9. Listhaug, O., & Ringdal, K. (2008). Trust in political institutions. In H. Ervasti, T. Fridberg, M. Hjerm, & K. Ringdal (Eds.), Nordic social attitudes in a European perspective (pp. 131–151). Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  10. Olsson, L.-E., Svedberg, L., & Grassman, E. J. (2006). Medborgarnas insatser och engagemang i civilsamhället – några grundläggande uppgifter från en ny befolkningsstudieno. Arbetsrapportserie nr 39. Sköndal: Sköndalsinstitutet.Google Scholar
  11. Rokkan, S. (1966). Norway: Numerical democracy and corporate pluralism. In R. A. Dahl (Ed.), Political oppositions in Western democracies (pp. 1–401). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Rokkan, S. (1967). Geography, religion, and social class: Crosscutting cleavages in Norwegian politics. In S. M. Lipset & S. Rokkan (Eds.), Party systems and voter alignments (pp. 367–444). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  13. Rothstein, B. (2002). Sweden: Social capital in the social democratic state. In R. D. Putnam (Ed.), Democracies in flux. The evolution of social capital in contemporary society (pp. 289–331). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Rothstein, B., & Stolle, D. (2003). Social capital, impartiality and the welfare state: An institutional approach. In M. Hooghe & D. Stolle (Eds.), Generating social capital. Civil society and institutions in comparative perspective (pp. 191–210). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Salamon, L. M., Sokolowski, S. W., & Associates (Eds.) (2004). Global civil society: Dimensions of the nonprofit sector, Volume II. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
  16. Selle, P. (1993). Voluntary organisations and the welfare state: The case of Norway. Voluntas, 4, 1–15.Google Scholar
  17. Sivesind, K. H. (2007). Frivillig sektor i Norge 1997–2004. Frivillig arbeid, medlemskap, sysselsetting og økonomi. Rapport no. 2007:10. Oslo, Norway: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  18. Sivesind, K. H. (2008a). Halvveis til Soria Moria. Ikke-kommersielle velferdstjenester, politikkens blinde flekk? Rapport no. 2008:03. Oslo, Norway: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  19. Sivesind, K. H. (2008b). Nonprofit organisasjoner på velferdsfeltet i Norden. In B. Ibsen, T. P. Boje, & T. Fridberg (Eds.), Det frivillige Danmark (pp. 161–178). Odense, Denmark: Syddansk Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
  20. Torpe, L., & Ferrer-Fons, M. (2007). The internal structure of associations. In L. Trägårdh (Ed.), State and civil society in Northern Europe. The Swedish model reconsidered. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  21. Tranvik, T., & Selle, P. (2007). The rise and fall of popular mass movements: Organizational change and globalization - the Norwegian case. Acta Sociologica, 50, 57–70.Google Scholar
  22. Trägårdh, L. (2007). State and civil society in Northern Europe. The Swedish model reconsidered. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  23. Wijkström, F. (2004). Changing focus or changing role? The Swedish nonprofit sector in the new millennium. In A. Zimmer & C. Stecker (Eds.), Strategy mix for nonprofit organisations: Vehicles for social and labour market integrations (pp. 15–40). New York: Kluwer/Plenum.Google Scholar
  24. Wollebæk, D., & Selle, P. (2002a). Det nye organisasjonssamfunnet – Demokrati i omforming [The New Organization Community – Democracy in Change]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.Google Scholar
  25. Wollebæk, D., & Selle, P. (2002b). Does participation in voluntary associations contribute to social capital? The importance of intensity, scope and type. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31, 32–61.Google Scholar
  26. Wollebæk, D., & Selle, P. (2007). Origins of social capital: Socialization and institutionalization approaches compared. Journal of Civil Society, 3, 1–24.Google Scholar
  27. Wollebæk, D., & Selle, P. (2008). A social democratic model of civil society? In B. Jobert & B. Kohler-Koch (Eds.), Changing images of civil society. From protest to governance (pp. 47–70). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karl Henrik Sivesind
    • 1
  • Per Selle
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for Social ResearchOsloNorway
  2. 2.Department of Comparative PoliticsUniversity of BergenBergenNorway