International Encyclopedia of Civil Society

2010 Edition
| Editors: Helmut K. Anheier, Stefan Toepler

Civil Society and Social Capital in Southeast Asia

  • Meredith Weiss
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-93996-4_725

Introduction

Southeast Asian regimes run the gamut from liberal and illiberal democracy to military authoritarianism and absolute monarchy. As such, generalizations regarding civil society and the generation of social capital in the region are impossible. Still, all states in the region leave at least some space for civil society (including informal opposition) and even formal opposition. These civil societies are neither homogeneous nor static. Moreover, it is not necessarily the institutionally strongest democracies that provide the broadest space for generation of social capital or collective action within civil society, though the opportunities and constraints facing citizens under a particular regime may favor or discourage particular modes of association and mobilization.

While attention to civil society and social capital has increased in the region since the 1980s, these are not new phenomena. By the 1920s, at least, substantial and vibrant associational life characterized much...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References/Further Readings

  1. Alagappa, M. (Ed.) (2004). Civil society and political change in Asia: Expanding and contracting democratic space. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aspinall, E. (2005). Opposing Suharto: Compromise, resistance, and regime change in Indonesia. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, D., et al. (Eds.) (1995). Towards illiberal democracy in Pacific Asia. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  4. Boudreau, V. (2001). Grass roots and cadre in the protest movement. Manila, Philippines: Ateneo de Manila University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Boudreau, V. (2004). Resisting dictatorship: Repression and protest in Southeast Asia. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bowie, K. A. (1997). Rituals of national loyalty: An anthropology of the State and the Village Scout Movement in Thailand. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Callahan, W. A. (2000). Pollwatching, elections and civil society in Southeast Asia. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  8. Chua, B. H. (1995). Communitarian ideology and democracy in Singapore. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Clarke, G. (1998). The politics of NGOs in South-East Asia: Participation and protest in the Philippines. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Eldridge, P. (1995). Non-government organizations and democratic participation in Indonesia. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hedman E. L. (2006). In the name of civil society: From free elections movements to people power in the Philippines. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hefner, R. W. (2000). Civil Islam: Muslims and democratization in Indonesia. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Heryanto, A., & Mandal, S. K. (2003). Challenging authoritarianism in Southeast Asia: Comparing Indonesia and Malaysia. New York: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
  14. Jones, D. M. (1998). Democratization, civil society, and illiberal middle class culture in Pacific Asia. Comparative Politics, 30(2), 147–169.Google Scholar
  15. Jones, D. M., & Brown, D. (1994). Singapore and the myth of the liberalizing middle class. The Pacific Review, 7(1), 79–87.Google Scholar
  16. Kerkvliet, B. J. (1977). The Huk Rebellion: A study of peasant protest in the Philippines. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  17. Kerkvliet, B. J., et al. (Eds.) (2003). Getting organized in Vietnam: Moving in and around the socialist State. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  18. Koh, G., & Ooi, G. L. (2000). State-society relations in Singapore. Singapore: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Piper, N., & Uhlin, U. (Eds.) (2004). Transnational activism in Asia: Problems of power and democracy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Pye, L. W. (1985). Asian power and politics: The cultural dimensions of authority. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Rodan, G. (Ed.) (1996). Political oppositions in industrialising Asia. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Rodan, G. (1997). Civil society and other political possibilities in Southeast Asia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 27(2), 156–178.Google Scholar
  23. Schak, D., & Hudson, W. (2003). Civil society in Asia. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  24. Scott, J. C. (1985). Weapons of the weak. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Uhlin, A. (1997). Indonesia and the “Third Wave of Democratization”: The Indonesian Pro-Democracy Movement in a changing world. Richmond: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
  26. Verma, V. (2002). Malaysia: State and civil society in transition. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  27. Walker, M. (1996). NGO participation in a corporatist State: The example of Indonesia. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California-Berkeley.Google Scholar
  28. Weiss, M. L. (2006). Protest and possibilities: Civil society and coalitions for political change in Malaysia. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Weiss, M. L., & Saliha, H. (Eds.) (2003). Social movements in Malaysia: From moral communities to NGOs. London: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
  30. Yamamoto, T. (Ed.) (1995). Emerging civil society in the Asia Pacific Community: Nongovernmental underpinnings of the emerging Asia Pacific Regional Community. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Meredith Weiss
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity at Albany (SUNY)AlbanyUSA