Skip to main content
  • 1251 Accesses

Introduction

Collective action lies at the heart of any vibrant civil society because civic engagement requires individuals to work together as part of a group. In plural societies, political parties, interest organizations, voluntary associations, and religious congregations serve an important role. Putnam et al. (1994) said these associations all help to “make democracy work.” Meyer and Tarrow (1998) characterize contemporary postindustrial societies as “social movement societies” in which interest organizations and protest groups are nearly ubiquitous. Too often, however, collective action is taken for granted by civic activists and prescriptive theorists of civil society alike. It is easy to assume that, because people belong to groups with common interests, the members of that group will act in concert to achieve those interests. These assumptions are challenged by collective action theory.

Definition

Developing out of rational-choice theory, the theory of collective action...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,100.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References/Further Readings

  • Chong, D. (1991). Collective action and the civil rights movement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94 (Suppl.), S92–S120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K. S., Hardin, R., & Levi, M. (2005). Cooperation without Trust? New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E., & Gintis, H. (2007). Human motivation and social cooperation: Experimental and analytical foundations. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1978). Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 83(6), 1420–1443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. (1982). Collective action. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hechter, M. (1987). Principles of group solidarity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckathorn, D. (1989). Collective action and the second-order free-rider problem. Rationality and Society, 1(1), 78–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., & Gintis, H. (2004). Foundations of human sociality: Economic experiments and ethnographic evidence from fifteen small-scale societies. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollock, P. (1998). Social dilemmas: The anatomy of cooperation. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 183–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichbach, M. (1994). The rebel’s dilemma. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marwell, G., & Oliver, P. (1993). The critical mass in collective action: A micro-social theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marwell, P., Marwell, G., & Texeira, R. (1985). A theory of the critical mass. I. interdependence, group heterogeneity, and the production of collection action. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 522–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, D., McCarthy, J., & Zald, M. (1996). Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D., & Tarrow, S. (Eds.) (1998). The social movement society. Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, P. (1984). If you don't do it, nobody else will: Active and token contributors to local collective action. American Sociological Review, 49(5), 601–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, P., & Marwell, G. (2001). Whatever happened to critical mass theory? A retrospective and assessment. Sociological Theory, 19(3), 292–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R.Y. (1994). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T. C. (1978). Micromotives and macrobehavior. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Pfaff, S., Valdez, S. (2010). Collective Action. In: Anheier, H.K., Toepler, S. (eds) International Encyclopedia of Civil Society. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-93996-4_539

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-93996-4_539

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-93994-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-93996-4

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics