Skip to main content

Guilty But Mentally III

  • Reference work entry
  • 22 Accesses

Synonyms

Legal insanity

Definition

Guilty but mentally ill is a verdict available in some jurisdictions in cases involving an insanity defense in which the defendant is considered guilty but is committed to a mental hospital rather than imprisoned. This plea is utilized if an examination shows a need for psychiatric treatment, and the metal illness interfered with the person’s ability to determine right from wrong.

In general, a person who pleads guilty but mentally ill may do so if the trier of fact finds that during the time of the incident, the person was mentally ill at the time of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. In order to proceed with the plea, the person who chooses guilty but mentally ill waives the right to trial if it is accepted by the judge. The judge will consider the rules of criminal procedure and hold a hearing for the sole purpose of determining whether sufficient evidence can be presented indicating that the defendant was mentally ill at the time of the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   1,350.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   1,299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References and Readings

  • Brown, M. (2007). The John Hinckley trial & its effect on the insanity defense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalby, J. T. (2006). The case of Daniel McNaughton: Let’s get the story straight. American Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 27, 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, J. W. (1986). The consequences of the insanity defense: Proposals to reform post-acquittal commitment laws. Catholic University Law Review, 35, 961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalleger, F. (2001). Criminal justice: A brief introduction. Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. ISBN 013396731X.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, N. (1985). The insanity defense before 1800. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 477, 25. doi:10.1177/0002716285477001003. at p.30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

De Fabrique, N. (2011). Guilty But Mentally III. In: Kreutzer, J.S., DeLuca, J., Caplan, B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79948-3_2245

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79948-3_2245

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-79947-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-79948-3

  • eBook Packages: Behavioral Science

Publish with us

Policies and ethics