Skip to main content

Double Blind Design

  • Reference work entry
  • 923 Accesses

Definition

The double-blind design describes an experimental procedure in which neither the participant nor the experimenter are aware of which group (i.e., experimental or control) each participant belongs to. The key that indicates in which group each participant belongs to is kept by a third individual and not given to the experimenter until the study is over.

Description

A Double-blind design designates a rigorous way of carrying out an experiment in an attempt to minimize subjective biases on the part of the experimenter and on the part of the participant [27]. A Double-blind design is most commonly utilized in medical studies that investigate the effectiveness of drugs. Participants are randomly assigned to the control or experimental group and given random numbers by a third party, who encodes the drugs with matching random numbers. The investigational drug is administered to the experimental group and the placebo substance (the word placebo derives from a Latin word meaning...

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-79061-9_888
  • Chapter length: 2 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   949.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-0-387-79061-9
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Hardcover Book
USD   999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

References

  1. Aronson, E., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1968). Experimentation in social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology: Vol. 2. Research methods (2nd ed., pp. 1–78). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barber, T. X. (1976). Pitfalls in human research: Ten pivotal points. New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rosenthal, R. (1966). Experimenter Effects in Behavior Research. NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sackett, D. L. (1979). Bias in analytic research. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 32, 51–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shapiro, A. K. (1968). Semantics of the Placebo. Psychiatric Quarterly, 42(4), 653–695.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Spector, P. E. (1981). Research designs. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Suls, J. M., & Ralph, L. (1988). Concerns about artifacts in psychological experiments. In J. Morawski (Ed.), The rise of experimentation in American psychology (pp. 153–187). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Anastassiou-Hadjicharalambous, X., Stylianou, M. (2011). Double Blind Design. In: Goldstein, S., Naglieri, J.A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Child Behavior and Development. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79061-9_888

Download citation