Skip to main content

Synonyms

Linguistic determinism; Linguistic relativity; Sapir-Whorf hypothesis

Definition

The hypothesis suggests that human thought is influenced by the language one speaks.

Description

The term Whorfian Hypothesis takes its name from Benjamin Lee Whorf (1876–1941) who claimed that the language one speaks influences one’s thinking [7]. Whorf was an amateur linguist who studied with the anthropologist Edward Sapir in the 1920s and 1930s. The term Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis is also used to refer to their view that language determines thinking. Linguistic determinism and linguistic relativity are also terms referring to the notion that the characteristics of one’s language shape one’s cognition.

The hypothesis was developed following observations of cross language differences in linguistic structure and speculations about how such differences might impact speakers’ thinking. For example, Whorf noted that in the Hopi language, there was little to no grammatical marking for tense. Utterances...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 949.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Berlin, B., & Kay, P. (1969). Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gordon, P. (2004). Numerical cognition without words: Evidence from Amazonia. Science, 306, 496–499.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Heider, E., & Olivier, D. (1972). The structure of the color space in naming and memory for two languages. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 337–354.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hunt, E., & Agnoli, F. (1991). The Whorfian hypothesis: A cognitive approach. Psychological Review, 98, 377–389.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pica, P., Lemer, C., & Izard, V. (2004). Exact and approximate calculation in an Amazonian indigene group with a reduced number lexicon. Science, 306, 499–503.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Roberson, D., Davies, I., & Davidoff, J. (2000). Colour categories are not universal: Replications and new evidence from a Stone-Age culture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Genera, 129, 369–398.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Yun, S., Kennison, S.M. (2011). Whorfian Hypothesis. In: Goldstein, S., Naglieri, J.A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Child Behavior and Development. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79061-9_3087

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics