Encyclopedia of Biometrics

2009 Edition
| Editors: Stan Z. Li, Anil Jain

Face Recognition, Geometric vs. Appearance-Based

  • Lior Wolf
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73003-5_92

Synonyms

Definition

In 2D face recognition, images are often represented either by their geometric structure, or by encoding their intensity values. A geometric representation is obtained by transforming the image into geometric primitives such as points and curves. This is done, for example, by locating distinctive features such as eyes, mouth, nose, and chin, and measuring their relative position, width, and possibly other parameters. Appearance-based representation is based on recording various statistics of the pixels’ values within the face image. Examples include: recording the intensities of the image as 2D arrays called templates and computing histograms of edge detectors’ outputs.

Introduction

Face identification systems are challenged by variations in head pose, camera viewpoint, image resolution, illumination, and facial expression, as well as by longer-term changes to the hair, skin, and head’s structure. The geometric approach,...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. 1.
    Brunelli, R., Poggio, T.: Face recognition: Features versus templates. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 15(10), 1042–1052 (1993)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kanade, T.: Picture processing system by computer complex and recognition of human faces. Ph.D. thesis, Kyoto University (1973)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ding, L., Martinez, A.: Precise detailed detection of faces and facial features. In: Proceedings of IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1–7 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gao, Y., Leung, M.: Face recognition using line edge map. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 24(6), 764–779 10.1109/TPAMI.2002.1008383(2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leung, M.K., Yang, Y.H.: Dynamic two-strip algorithm in curve fitting. Pattern Recognit. 23(1–2), 69–79 (1990)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heisele, B., Serre, T., Poggio, T.: A component-based framework for face detection and identification. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 74(2), 167–181 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ahonen, T., Hadid, A., Pietikainen, M.: Face Description with Local Binary Patterns: Application to Face Recognition. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 28(12), 2037–2041 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Turk, M., Pentland, A.: Eigenfaces for Recognition. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 3(1), 71–86 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Belhumeur, P., Hespanha, J., Kriegman, D.: Eigenfaces vs. Fisherfaces: recognition using class specific linear projection. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 19(7), 711–720 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Allwein, E.L., Schapire, R.E., Singer, Y.: Reducing multiclass to binary: a unifying approach for margin classifiers. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 1, 113–141 (2001)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nowak, E., Jurie, F.: Learning visual similarity measures for comparing never seen objects. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Geurts, P., Ernst, D., Wehenkel, L.: Extremely randomized trees. J Mach. Learn. Res. 36(1), 3–42 (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lanitis, A., Taylor, C.J., Cootes, T.F.: A unified approach to coding and interpreting face images. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 368–374. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA (1995)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wiskott, L., Fellous, J.M., Kröger, N., von der Malsburg, C.: Face recognition by elastic bunch graph matching. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 19(7), 775–779 (1997)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sivic, J., Everingham, M., Zisserman, A.: Person spotting: Video shot retrieval for face sets. In: 4th International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval, pp. 226–236 (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lowe, D.G.: Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 60(2), 91–110 10.1023/B:VISI.0000029664.99615.94(2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Meyers, E., Wolf, L.: Using biologically inspired features for face processing. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 76(1), 93–104 (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Huang, G., Jain, V., Learned-Miller, E.: Unsupervised joint alignment of complex images. Computer Vision, In: IEEE International Conference pp. 1–8 (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhou, Y., Gu, L., Zhang, H.J.: Bayesian tangent shape model: estimating shape and pose parameters via bayesian inference. In: IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, vol. 1, pp. I–109–I–116 (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lior Wolf
    • 1
  1. 1.The Blavatnik School of Computer ScienceTel-Aviv University Israel