Encyclopedia of Biometrics

2009 Edition
| Editors: Stan Z. Li, Anil Jain

Fingerprint, Forensic Evidence of

  • Didier Meuwly
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73003-5_181

Synonyms

Definition

Forensic evidence of fingerprint is the field of forensic expertise related to the inference of the identity of source from the examination of all the friction ridge skin, namely the fingers, the palms, the toes, the soles, and their marks. But for the sake of simplicity, the text is mainly focused on fingerprints and fingermarks. The extreme variability of the fingerprints derives firstly from the knowledge of the morphogenesis of the papillary ridges pertaining to embryology and, secondly, from statistical researches pertaining to dactyloscopy. This variability is mainly used in four different processes within forensic science: identity verification, forensic intelligence, forensic investigation, and forensic evaluation. The first three processes are based on the use of Automatic Fingerprint Identification Systems (AFIS). The...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Meuwly, D.: Forensic individualization from biometric data. Sci. Justice 46(4), 205–213 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kuecken, M., Newell, A.C.: Fingerprint formation. J. Theor. Biol. 235, 71–83 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wertheim, K., Maceo, A.: The critical stage of friction ridge and pattern formation. J. Forensic Ident. 52(1), 35–85 (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jain, A.K., Prabahakar, S., Pankanti, S.: On the similarity of Identical Twin Fingerprints. Pattern Recognit. 35(12), 2653–2663 (2002)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Champod, C., et al. Fingerprints and other Ridge Skin impressions. CRC press, London (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ashbaugh, D.R.: Qualitative-quantitative friction ridge analysis – An introduction to basic and advanced ridgeology. In: Geberth, V.J. (ed.) Practical Aspects in Criminal and Forensic Investigations. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stoney, D.A.: Measurement of fingerprint individuality. In: Lee, H.C. Gaensslen, R.E. (eds.) Advances in Fingerprint Technology, pp. 327–388. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Neumann, C., et al. Computation of likelihood ratios in fingerprint identification for configurations of any number of minutiae. J. Forensic Sci. 52(1), 54–64 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berry, J., Stoney, D.A.: History and development of fingerprinting. In: Lee, H.C., Gaensslen, R.E. (eds.) Advances in Fingerprint Technology, pp. 1–40. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    McCabe, R. M. (ed.): Data format for the interchange of fingerprint, facial, scar mark & tatoo (SMT) Information, American National Standard ANSI/NIST-ILT 1-2000, July (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fine, G.E.: A Review of the FBI’s handling of the Brandon Mayfield case. 2006, Office of the Inspector General, U.S. Department of JusticeGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Office of the Inspector General, United States Department of Justice. A Review of the FBIs Handling of the Brandon Mayfield Case: Unclassified Executive Summary, Washington, DC (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Champod, C.: Dactyloscopy: Standards of proof, In: Siegel, J. (ed.) 1Encyclopedia of Forensic Science. Academic, London. (2000)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Taroni, F., Champod, C., Margot, P.: Forerunners of Bayesianism in early forensic science. Jurimetrics 38, 183–200 (1998)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Good, I.J.: Weight of evidence and the Bayesian likelihood ratio, In: Aitken, C.G.G. (ed.) Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists. Wiley, Chichester, UK (1995)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aitken, C.G.G., Taroni, F.: Statistics and the evaluation of evidence for forensic scientists. Wiley, Chichester, UK (2004)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stoney, D.A.: What made us ever think we could individualize using statistics. J. Forensic Sci. Soc. 31(2), 197–199 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Didier Meuwly

    There are no affiliations available