Encyclopedia of Biometrics

2009 Edition
| Editors: Stan Z. Li, Anil Jain

Iris Template Extraction Via Bit Inconsistency and GRIT

  • Gerry Vernon Dozier
  • Marios Savvides
  • Kelvin Bryant
  • Taihei Munemoto
  • Karl RicanekJr.
  • Damon Woodard
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73003-5_165

Synonyms

Bit fragility; Bit inconsistency;  Fragile bits

Definition

The characteristic of iris code bits values being inconsistent (also referred to as fragile) across different images of the same iris was explored by Hollingsworth et al. [1]. The notion of fragile bits was first suggested by Bolle et al. [2] when it was observed that the empirical false reject rate (FRR) was significantly better than predicted by their theoretical model. This fact implied that the bits of an iris code are not equally susceptible to “flip”, given different environmental conditions that affect the quality of the captured iris images. Hollingsworth et al. demonstrated that by eliminating (masking) inconsistent bits, one could dramatically improve the FRR of an iris template.

Although the work of Hollingsworth et al. improves the FRR by identifying and removing fragile bits, our preliminary results show that it may be possible, based on bit instability, to further reduce the number of iris code bits...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. 1.
    Hollingsworth, K., Bowyer, K., Flynn, P.: All iris code bits are not created equal. In: 2007 IEEE Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications, and Systems, September (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bolle, R.M., Pankanti, S., Connell, J.H., Ratha, N.: Iris individuality: A partial iris model. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, vol. 2, pp. 927–930 (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davis, L.: Handbook of Genetic Algorithms. Van Nostrand Reinhold New York, (1991)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dozier, G., Homaifar, A., Tunstel, E., Battle, D.: An Introduction to Evolutionary Computation (Chapter 17). In: Zilouchian, A., Jamshidi, M. (eds.) Intelligent Control Systems Using Soft Computing Methodologies, pp. 365–380. CRC press Boca Raton, FL, (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fogel, D.B.: Evolutionary computation: Toward a new philosophy of machine intelligence, 2nd edn. Las Alomitas, IEEE Press (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goldberg, D.E.: Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization & Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., Reading, Massachusetts (1989)MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Daugman, J.: How iris recognition works. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Video Technol. 14(1), 21–30 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Syswerda, G.: Uniform Crossover in Genetic Algorithms. In: David S. (eds.) Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Genetic Algorithms (ICGA-89), pp. 2–9. Morgan Kaufmann San Francisco, CA, (1989)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thornton, S.M., Kumar, V.: Robust iris recognition using advanced correlation techniques. Proceedings of the International Conference On Image Analysis and Recognition, pp. 1098–1105 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Daugman, J.: High confidence visual recognition of persons by a test of statistical independence. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. 15(11), 1148–1161 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Iris Challenge Evaluation. National Institute of Standards and Technology, http://iris.nist.gov/ICE/, (2006)

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerry Vernon Dozier
    • 1
  • Marios Savvides
    • 2
  • Kelvin Bryant
    • 1
  • Taihei Munemoto
    • 2
  • Karl RicanekJr.
    • 3
  • Damon Woodard
    • 4
  1. 1.North Carolina A&T State University  
  2. 2.Carnegie Mellon University  
  3. 3.University of North Carolina at Wilmington  
  4. 4.Clemson University