Skip to main content

Trust in Blogosphere

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of Database Systems

Synonyms

Reputation; Relationship of reliance

Definition

Trust can be defined as the relationship of reliance between two parties or individuals. Alice trusts Bob implies Alice’s reliance on the actions of Bob, based on what they know about each other. Trust is basically prediction of an otherwise unknown decision made by a party or an individual based on the actions of another party or individual. Trust is always directional and asymmetric. Alice trusts Bob does not imply Bob also trusts Alice.

From a sociological perspective, trust is the measure of belief of one party in another’s honesty, benevolence, and competence. Absence of any of these properties causes failure of trust. From a psychological perspective, trust can be defined as the ability of a party or an individual to influence the other. The more trusting someone is the more easily (s)he can be influenced.

The past several years witnessed significant changes in the interactions between the individuals and groups....

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 2,500.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Recommended Reading

  1. Agarwal N., Liu H., Tang L., and Yu P.S. Identifying the influential bloggers in a community. In Proc. Int. Conf. Web Search and Web Data Mining, 2008, pp. 207–218.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Golbeck J. and Hendler J. Inferring binary trust relationships in web-based social networks. ACM Trans. Inter. Tech., 6(4):497–529, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Guha R., Kumar R., Raghavan P., and Tomkins A. Propagation of trust and distrust. In Proc. 12th Int. World Wide Web Conference, 2004, pp. 403–412.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kale A., Karandikar A., Kolari P., Java A., Finin T., and Joshi A. Modeling trust and influence in the blogosphere using link polarity. In Proc. 1st Int.'l AAAI Conf. on Weblogs and Social Media, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pujol J.M., Sangesa R., and Delgado J. Extracting reputation in multi agent systems by means of social network topology. In Proc. 1st Int. Joint Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2002, pp. 467–474.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sabater J. and Sierra C. Reputation and social network analysis in multi-agent systems. In Proc. 1st Int. Joint Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2002, pp. 475–482.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Terveen L. and McDonald D.W. Social matching: a framework and research agenda. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 12(3):401–434, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yu B. and Singh M.P. Detecting deception in reputation management. In Proc. 2nd Int. Joint Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2003, pp. 73–80.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Agarwal, N., Liu, H. (2009). Trust in Blogosphere. In: LIU, L., ÖZSU, M.T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Database Systems. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-39940-9_438

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics