Encyclopedia of Remote Sensing

2014 Edition
| Editors: Eni G. Njoku

Remote Sensing and Geologic Structure

  • Vernon H. SinghroyEmail author
  • Paul Lowman
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36699-9_176

Introduction

Geology is sometimes distinguished from geophysics as being the study of the outside – the surface of the Earth and structures expressed at the surface – and geophysics being the study of the inside of the Earth. These lighthearted definitions are a convenient introduction to what has become the most pervasive and important direct uses of satellite images for geology and, in particular, structural geology.

The value of satellite images for topographic mapping and military reconnaissance was realized at an early stage, but there was virtually no appreciation of the value of orbital methods for geology until the mid-1960s, after hundreds of satellites had been launched. However, geologic remote sensing was given a sudden and unpredicted jump start by the US Mercury and the Gemini programs.

Project Mercury, the first American manned space effort, began in 1958, with the successful orbital flight by John Glenn in 1962. Beginning with the second flight, by Scott Carpenter, the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Ames, D., Singhroy, V., Buckle, J., and Molch, K., 2006. Geology, integrated bedrock geology – RADARSAT – digital elevation data of Sudbury, ON. Geological Survey of Canada, Open File 4571, 1 sheet 1 CD-ROM, doi:10.4095/222241.Google Scholar
  2. Lowman, P., 1994. Radar geology of the Canadian Shield – a 10 year review. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 20(3), 198–209.Google Scholar
  3. Lowman, P. D., Jr., 2002. Exploring Space, Exploring Earth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 362.Google Scholar
  4. Lundgren, P., Hetland, E. A., Liu, Z., and Fielding, E. J., 2009. Southern San Andreas-San Jacinto fault system slip rates estimated from earthquake cycle models constrained by GPS and interferometric synthetic aperture radar observations. Journal of Geophysical Research, 114, 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Mungall, J. E., Ames, D. E., and Hanley, J. J., 2004. Geochemical evidence from the Sudbury structure for crustal redistribution by large bolide impacts. Nature, 429, 546–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Singhroy, V., and Molch, K., 2004. Geological applications of RADARSAT-2. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 30(6), 893–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Applications Development Section, Natural Resources CanadaCanada Centre for Remote SensingOttawaCape verde
  2. 2.NASA Goddard, Code 698.0GreenbeltUSA