Skip to main content

Evolution of Culture, Memetics

  • Reference work entry

Definition of the Subject

Cultural traits are transmitted from person to person, similarly to genes or viruses. Cultural evolution therefore can be understood through thesame basic mechanisms of reproduction, spread, variation, and natural selection that underlie biological evolution. This implies a shift from genesas units of biological information to a new type of units of cultural information: memes. The concept of meme canbe defined as an information pattern, held in an individual's memory, which is capable of being copied to another individual's memory. Memetics can thenbe defined as the theoretical and empirical science that studies the replication, spread and evolution of memes. Memes differ in their degree of fitness,i. e. adaptedness to the socio‐cultural environment in which they propagate. Fitter memes will be more successful in being communicated,“infecting” more individuals, thus spreading over a larger population. This biological analogy allows us to apply Darwinian...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   3,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

Culture :

The attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors that, for a certain group, define their general way of life and that they have taken over from others.

Cultural evolution:

The development of culture over time, as conceptualized through the mechanisms of variation and natural selection of cultural elements.

Replicator:

An information pattern that is able to make copies of itself, typically with the help of another system. Examples are genes, memes, and (computer) viruses.

Meme :

A cultural replicator; a unit of imitation or communication.

Memeplex (or meme complex):

A collection of mutually supporting memes, which tend to replicate together.

Memetics :

The theoretical and empirical science that studies the replication, spread and evolution of memes.

Fitness:

The overall success rate of a replicator, as determined by its degree of adaptation to its environment, and the three requirements of longevity, fecundity and copying‐fidelity.

Longevity:

The duration that an individual replicator survives.

Fecundity:

The speed of reproduction of a replicator, as measured by the number of copies made per time unit.

Copying-fidelity:

The degree to which a replicator is accurately reproduced.

Vertical transmission:

Transmission of traits (memes or genes) from parents to offspring.

Horizontal transmission:

Transmission of traits between individuals of the same generation.

Memotype:

A meme in the form of information held in an individual's memory.

Mediotype:

A meme as expressed in an external medium, such as a text, an artefact, a song, or a behavior.

Sociotype:

The group or community of individuals who hold a particular meme in their memory.

Bibliography

Primary Literature

  1. Albert R, Barabasi AL (2002) Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev Mod Phys 74:47–97

    MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Atran S (2001) The Trouble with memes: Inference versus imitation in cultural creation. Hum Nat 12:351–381

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aunger R (2001) Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics As a Science. University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aunger R (2002) Exposure versus susceptibility in the epidemiology of ‘everyday’ beliefs. J Cogn Cult 2(2):113–154

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aunger R (2003) Cultural transmission and diffusion. In: Nadel L (ed) Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. MacMillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  6. Aunger R (2003) The Electric Meme: A New Model of How We Think. Simon and Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aunger R (2004) Memes, In: Kuper A, Kuper J (eds) The Social Science Encyclopedia, 3rd edn. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  8. Axelrod R (1997) The Dissemination of Culture: A Model with Local Convergence and Global Polarization. J Confl Resolut 41:203–26

    Google Scholar 

  9. Baldassarre G, Parisi D (1999) Trial-and-Error Learning, Noise and Selection in Cultural Evolution: A Study Through Artificial Life Simulations. In: Proceedings of the AISB'99 Symposium on Imitation in Animals and Artifacts

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bangerter A, Heath C (2004) The Mozart effect: Tracking the evolution of a scientific legend. Br J Soc Psychol 43:605–623

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bennet C, Li M, Ma B (2003) Chain Letters & Evolutionary Histories. Sci Am 288(6):76–81

    Google Scholar 

  12. Best ML (1997) Models for interacting populations of memes: Competition and niche behavior. J Memetics 1(2) http://jom-emit.cfpm.org/1997/vol1/best_ml.html

  13. Best ML (1998) An ecology of text: Using text retrieval to study alife on the net. J Artif Life 3(4):261–287

    Google Scholar 

  14. Best ML (1999) How culture can guide evolution: An inquiry into gene/meme enhancement. J Adapt Behav 7(3/4):289–306

    Google Scholar 

  15. Blackmore S (2000) The Meme Machine. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bonner JT (1980) The Evolution of Culture in Animals. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  17. Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1985) Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago University Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  18. Brodie R (1996) Virus of the mind: The new science of the meme. Integral Press, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bull L, Holland W, Blackmore S (2001) On meme-gene coevolution. Artif Life 6(3):227–235

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bura S (1994) MINIMEME: Of life and death in the Noosphere. In: Cliff D, Husbands P, Meyer JA Wilson SW (eds) From Animals to Animats 3: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 479–486

    Google Scholar 

  21. Campbell DT (1974) Evolutionary Epistemology. In: Schilpp PA (ed) The Philosophy of Karl Popper. Open Court Publish, La Salle, pp 413–463

    Google Scholar 

  22. Castelfranchi C (2001) Towards a Cognitive Memetics: Socio-Cognitive Mechanisms for Memes Selection and Spreading. J Memetics Evol Models Inf Transm 5

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cavalli-Sforza LL, Feldman MW (1981)Cultural transmission and evolution: A quantitative approach.Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chielens K (2003) The Viral Aspects of Language: A Quantitative Research of Memetic Selection Criteria. Master's thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel. http://memetics.chielens.net/master/thesis.pdf

  25. Chielens K, Heylighen F (2005) Operationalization of Meme Selection Criteria: procedures to empirically test memetic hypotheses. In: Proceedings AISB 2005

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cullen B (1999) Parasite Ecology and the Evolution of Religion, In: Heylighen F, Bollen J, Riegler A (eds) The Evolution of Complexity. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dawkins R (1989) The Selfish Gene, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  28. Dawkins R (1993) Viruses of the mind, In: Dahlbom B (ed) Dennett and his Critics: Demystifying the Mind. Blackwell, USA, pp 12–27

    Google Scholar 

  29. de Jong M (1999) Survival of the institutionally fittest concepts. J Memetics Evol Models Inf Transm 3. http://jom-emit.cfpm.org/1999/vol3/de_jong_m.html

  30. Denaro D, Parisi D (1996) Cultural evolution in a population of neural networks. In: Marinaro M, Tagliaferri R (eds) Neural nets: Wirn96. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  31. Dennett D (1995) Darwin's dangerous idea. Hammondsworth, Penguin

    Google Scholar 

  32. Doran J (1998) Simulating Collective Misbelief. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 1:1. http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/1/1/3.html

    Google Scholar 

  33. Durham WH (1991) Coevolution: Genes, culture and human diversity. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  34. Edmonds B (2002) Three Challenges for the Survival of Memetics. J Memetics Evol Models Inf Transm 6. http://jom-emit.cfpm.org/2002/vol6/edmonds_b_letter.html

  35. Epstein J, Axtell R (1996) Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up. MIT Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  36. Evers JR (1998) A justification of societal altruism according to the memetic application of Hamilton's rule. Proc 16th Int Congress on Cybernetics. Namur: Association Internat de Cybernétique, pp 437–442

    Google Scholar 

  37. Flentge F, Polani D, Uthmann T (2001) Modelling the Emergence of Possession Norms using Memes. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 4(4). http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/4/4/3.html

  38. Flinn MV, Alexander RD (1982) Culture theory: The developing synthesis from biology. Hum Ecol 10:383–400

    Google Scholar 

  39. Gabora L (1995) Meme and variations: A Computer Model of Cultural Evolution. In: Nadel L, Stein D (eds) 1993 Lectures in Complex Systems. Addison-Wesley, Boston, pp 471–485

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gil-White FJ (2005) Common Misunderstandings of Memes (and Genes). The Promise and the Limits of the Genetic Analogy to Cultural Transmission Processes. In: Hurley S, Chater N (eds) Perspectives on Imitation. From Neuroscience to Social Science, vol 2. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 317–338

    Google Scholar 

  41. Godin S (2002) Unleashing the Ideavirus. Simon and Schuster, London

    Google Scholar 

  42. Goodenough OR, Dawkins R (2002) The ‘St Jude’ mind virus. Nature 371:23–24

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. Greenberg M (2005) Goals versus Memes: Explanation in the Theory of Cultural Evolution. In: Hurley S, Chater N (ed) Perspectives on Imitation. From Neuroscience to Social Science, vol 2. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 339–353

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hale-Evans R (1995) Memetics: A Systems Metabiology working report. http://ron.ludism.org/memetics.html

  45. Hales D (1998) Selfish memes & selfless agents – Altruism in the swap shop. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems. IEEE Press, Los Gatos

    Google Scholar 

  46. Heath C, Bell C, Sternberg E (2001) Emotional Selection in Memes: The Case of Urban Legends. J Pers Soc Psychol 81(6):1028–1041

    Google Scholar 

  47. Heylighen F (1992) Selfish Memes and the Evolution of Cooperation. J Ideas 2(4):77–84

    Google Scholar 

  48. Heylighen F (1993) Selection C riteria for the Evolution of Knowledge. In: Proc 13th Int Congress on Cybernetics Association Internat de Cybernétique, Namur, pp 524–528

    Google Scholar 

  49. Heylighen F (1997) Objective, subjective and intersubjective selectors of knowledge. Evol Cogn 3(1):63–67

    Google Scholar 

  50. Heylighen F (1998) What makes a meme successful? Selection Criteria for Cultural Evolution. Proc 16th Int Congress on Cybernetics. Association Internat de Cybernétique, Namur

    Google Scholar 

  51. Heylighen F, Campbell DT (1995) Selection of Organization at the Social Level: obstacles and facilitators of metasystem transitions. World Futures: J General Evol 45:181–212

    Google Scholar 

  52. Hinton GE, Nowlan SJ (1987) How Learning Can Guide Evolution. Complex Syst 1:495–502

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. Holland JH, Holyoak KJ, Nisbett RE, Thagard PR (1986) Induction: processes of inference, learning and discovery. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  54. Hull DL (1982) The naked meme. In: Plotkin HC (ed) Development and culture: Essays in evolutionary epistemology. Chichester, Wiley, pp 272–327

    Google Scholar 

  55. James W (1880) Great Men and their Environment. http://www.des.emory.edu/mfp/jgreatmen.html. Accessed 28 Sept 2005

  56. Kauffman SA (1993) The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  57. Lake MW (1998) Digging for memes: The role of material objects in cultural evolution. In: Renfrew C, Scarre C (eds) Cognition and material culture: the archeology of symbolic storage. McDonald Institute Monographs, Cambridge pp 77–88

    Google Scholar 

  58. Lumsden C, Wilson E (1981) Genes, Mind, and Culture: the Coevolutionary Process. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  59. Lynch A (1996) Thought contagion: How beliefs spread through society: The new science of memes. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  60. Lynch A (1998) Units, events and dynamics in memetic evolution. J Memetics Evol Models Inf Transm 2. http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jomemit/1998/vol2/lynch_a.html

  61. Lyons A, Kashima Y (2001) The reproduction of culture: Communication processes tend to maintain cultural stereotypes. Soc Cogn 19:372–394

    Google Scholar 

  62. Lyons A, Kashima Y (2003) How Are Stereotypes Maintained Through Communication? J Pers Soc Psychol 85:989–1005

    Google Scholar 

  63. Marsden P (2002) Brand positioning: meme's the word. Mark Intell Plan 20(5):307–12

    Google Scholar 

  64. Marsden P, Kirby J (2005) Connected Marketing: The Buzz, Viral and Word of Mouth Revolution. Elsevier, London

    Google Scholar 

  65. Müller M (1870) The Science of Language. Nature 2:256–259

    Google Scholar 

  66. Pocklington R, Best ML (1997) Cultural evolution and units of selection in replicating text. J Theor Biol 188:79–87

    Google Scholar 

  67. Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of Innovations, Fifth Edition. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  68. Schaller M, Conway LG III, Tanchuk TL (2002) Selective pressures on the once and future contents of ethnic stereotypes: Effects of the ‘communicability’ of traits. J Pers Soc Psychol 82:861–877

    Google Scholar 

  69. Steels L (1998) Synthesising the origins of language and meaning using co-evolution, selforganisation and level formation. In: Hurford J (ed) Evolution of Human Language. Edinburgh Univ Press, Edinburg

    Google Scholar 

  70. Thagard P (1989) Explanatory Coherence. Behav Brain Sci 12:435–467

    Google Scholar 

  71. Van Overwalle F, Heylighen F (2006) Talking Nets: A Multi-Agent Connectionist Approach to Communication and Trust between Individuals. Psychol Rev 113:606–627

    Google Scholar 

  72. Van Wyhe J (2005) The Descent of words: evolutionary thinking 1780–1880. Endeavour 29(3):94–100

    Google Scholar 

  73. Wilkins JS (1998) What's in a meme? Reflections from the perspective of the history and philosophy of evolutionary biology. J Memetics Evol Models Inf Transm 2. http://jom-emit.cfpm.org/1998/vol2/wilkins_js.html

Books and Reviews

  1. Benzon W (1996) Culture as an evolutionary arena. J Soc Evol Syst 19:321–362 http://www.newsavanna.com/wlb/CE/Arena/Arena00.shtml

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blackmore S (2000) The Meme Machine. University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blackmore S (2001) Evolution And Memes: The Human Brain As A Selective Imitation Device. Cybern Syst 32(1–2):225–255; http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/tandf/ucbs;jsessionid=1b1oec7s7li7s.henrietta

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1985) Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago University Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  5. Edmonds B (1998) On Modelling in Memetics. J Memetics Evol Models Inf Transm 2. http://jom-emit.cfpm.org/1998/vol2/edmonds_b.html

  6. Fog A (1999) Cultural Selection. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  7. Heyes CM (1994) Imitation and culture: Longevity, fecundity and fidelity in social transmission. In: Galef BG, Mainardi M, Valsecchi P (eds) Behavioural Aspects of Feeding. Harwood, Chur, pp 271–287

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jesiek BK (2003) Betwixt the Popular and Academic: The Histories and Origins of Memetics. Master Thesis, Virginia Tech

    Google Scholar 

  9. Marsden P (1998) Memetics and Social Contagion: Two Sides of the Same Coin. J Memetics Evol Models Inf Transm 2. http://jom-emit.cfpm.org/1998/vol2/marsden_p.html

  10. Moritz E (1990) Memetic Science: I – General Introduction. J Ideas 1:1–23

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag

About this entry

Cite this entry

Heylighen, F., Chielens, K. (2009). Evolution of Culture, Memetics. In: Meyers, R. (eds) Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3_189

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics