Skip to main content

Market liquidity1

  • Reference work entry
  • 6189 Accesses

Abstract

Liquidity, which is integrally related to trading costs, refers to the ability of individuals to trade at reasonable prices with reasonable speed. As such, liquidity is a major determinant, along with risk and return, of a company’s share value. Unfortunately, an operational, generally accepted measure of liquidity does not exist. This entry considers the following proxy measures: the bid—ask spread, the liquidity ratio (which relates the number or value of shares traded during a brief interval to the absolute value of the percentage price change over the interval), and the variance ratio (which relates the volatility of short-term price movements to longer-term price movements). The determinants of liquidity considered are the size of the market for a stock and market structure. The paper concludes by stressing that illiquidity increases the cost of equity capital for firms, but that trading costs can be reduced and liquidity enhanced by the institution of a superior trading system.

Keywords

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   329.00
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Amihud, Y. and Mendelson, H. (1986). “Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread.” Journal of Financial Economics, 17(2): 223–49.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  2. Beebower, G., Kamath, V. and Surz, R. (1985). “Commission and transaction costs of stock market trading.” Working paper, SEI Corporation, July.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bernstein, P. (1987). “Liquidity, stock markets, and market makers.” Financial Management, 16: 54–62.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  4. Brennan, M.J. and Subrahmanyam, A. (1996). “Market microstructure and asset pricing: on the compensation for illiquidity in stock returns.” Journal of Financial Economics, 41(3): 441–464.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen, K., Maier, S., Schwartz, R.A., and Whitcomb, D. (1986). The Microstructure of Securities Markets. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cooper, K., Groth, J., and Avera, W. (1985). “Liquidity, exchange listing, and common stock performance.” Journal of Economics and Business, 37(1): 19–33.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  7. Easley, D., Hvidkjaer, S., and O’Hara, M. (2002). “Is information risk a determinant of asset returns?” Journal of Finance, 57: 2185–2221.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  8. Economides, N. and Siow, A. (1988). “The division of markets is limited by the extent of liquidity.” American Economic Review, 78: 108–121.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grossman, S.J. and Miller, M. (1988). “Liquidity and market structure.” Journa1 of Finance, 43: 617–633.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  10. Hasbrouck, J. and Schwartz, R.A. (1988). “Liquidity and execution costs in equity markets.” Journal of Portfolio Management, 14(3): 10–17.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  11. Ho, T., Schwartz, R.A., and Whitcomb, D. (1985). “The trading decision and market clearing under transaction price uncertainty.” Journal of Finance, 40(1): 21–42.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  12. Hui, B. and Heubel, B. (1984). “Comparative liquidity advantages among major US stock markets.” DRI Financial Information Group Study Series No. 84081.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jones, C.M. (2002). “A century of stock market liquidity and trading costs.” Working Paper, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lippman, S.A. and McCall, J.J. (1986). “An operational measure of liquidity.” American Economic Review, 76(1): 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ozenbas, D., Schwartz, R.A., and Wood, R. (2002). “Volatility in US and European equity markets: an assessment of market quality.” International Finance, 5(3): 437–461.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  16. Pastor, L. and Stambaugh, R.F. (2003). “Liquidity risk and expected stock returns.” Journal of Political Economy, 111(3): 642–685.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  17. Schwartz, R.A. and Francioni, R. (2004). Equity Markets In Action: The Fundamentals of Market Structure and Trading. New Jersey: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sofianos, G. (2001). Trading and market structure research, Goldman Sachs.

    Google Scholar 

  19. US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (2000). “Disclosure of order routing and execution practices.” Release No. 34-43084, 28 July.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this entry

Cite this entry

Schwartz, R.A., Peng, L. (2006). Market liquidity1 . In: Lee, CF., Lee, A.C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Finance. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-26336-6_62

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-26336-6_62

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-26284-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-26336-6

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics

Publish with us

Policies and ethics