Skip to main content

A note on the relationship among the portfolio performance indices under rank transformation

  • Reference work entry

Abstract

This paper analytically determines the conditions under which four commonly utilized portfolio measures (the Sharpe index, the Treynor index, the Jensen alpha, and the Adjusted Jensen’s alpha) will be similar and different. If the single index CAPM model is appropriate, we prove theoretically that well-diversified portfolios must have similar rankings for the Treynor, Sharpe indices, and Adjusted Jensen’s alpha ranking. The Jensen alpha rankings will coincide if and only if the portfolios have similar betas. For multi-index CAPM models, however, the Jensen alpha will not give the same ranking as the Treynor index even for portfolios of large size and similar betas. Furthermore, the adjusted Jensen’s alpha ranking will not be identical to the Treynor index ranking.

Keywords

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   329.00
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Black, F., Jensen, M.C., and Scholes, M. (1972). “The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Some empirical tests,” in M.C. Jensen (ed.) Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets, New York: Praeger Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burgess, R.C. and Johnson, K.H. (1976). “The effects of sampling fluctuations on required inputs of security analysis.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 11:847–854.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, S.N. and Lee, C.F. (1981). “The sampling relationship between sharpe’s performance measure and its risk proxy: sample size, investment horizon, and market conditions.” Management Science, 27(6): 607–618.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, S.N. and Lee, C.F. (1984). “On measurement errors and ranking of three alternative composite performance measures.” Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, 24: 7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, S.N. and Lee, C.F. (1986). “The effects of the sample size, the investment horizon, and market conditions on the validity of composite performance measures: a generalization.” Management Science, 32(11): 1410–1421.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  6. Coggin, T.D. (1998). “Long-term memory in equity style index.” Journal of Portfolio Management, 24(2): 39–46.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  7. Evans, J.L. and Archer, S.H. (1968). “Diversification and reduction of dispersion: an empirical analysis.” Journal of Finance, 23: 761–767.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fama, E.F. and MacBeth, J.D. (1973). “Risk, return and equilibrium: empirical tests.” Journal of Political Economy, 81: 607–636.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  9. Francis, J.C. (1980). Investments: Analysis and Management, 3rd edn, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Friend, I. and Blume, M.E. (1970). “Measurement of portfolio performance under uncertainty.” American Economic Review, 60: 561–575.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jensen, M.C. (1968). “The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945–1964.” Journal of Finance, 23(3): 389–416.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  12. Jensen, M.C. (1969). “Risk, the pricing of capital assets, and the evaluation of investment portfolio.” Journal of Business, 19(2): 167–247.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  13. Johnson, K.H. and Burgess, R.C. (1975). “The effects of sample sizes on the accuracy of E-V and SSD efficient criteria.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 10: 813–848.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  14. Johnson, K.H. and Shannon, D.S. (1974). “A note on diversification and reduction of dispersion.” Journal of Financial Economics, 4: 365–372.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim, T. (1978). “An assessment of performance of mutual fund management.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 13(3): 385–406.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  16. Klemkosky, R.C. (1973). “The bias in composite performance measures.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 8: 505–514.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee, C.F. (1976). “Investment horizon and functional form of the Capital Asset Pricing Model.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 58: 356–363.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee, C.F. and Jen, F.C. (1978). “Effects of measurement errors on systematic risk and performance measure of a portfolio.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 13: 299–312.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  19. Levhari, D. and Levy, H. (1977). “The Capital Asset Pricing Model and investment horizon.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 59: 92–104.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  20. Levy, H. (1972). “Portfolio performance and investment horizon.” Management Science, 18(12): B645–B653.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  21. Litner, J. (1965). “The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investment in stock portfolios and capital budgets.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 47: 13–47.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  22. Litzenberger, R.H. and Ramaswami, K. (1979). “The effects of personal taxes and dividends on capital asset prices: theory and empirical evidence.” Journal of Financial Economics, 7(2): 163–196.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  23. Litzenberger, R.H. and Ramaswami, K. (1980). “Dividends, short selling restriction, tax induced investor clienteles and market equilibrium.” Journal of Finance, 35(2): 469–482.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  24. Litzenberger, R.H. and Ramaswami, K. (1982). “The effects of dividends on common stock prices tax effects or information effect.” The Journal of Finance, 37(2): 429–443.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  25. Lo, A.W. (1991) “Long-term memory in stock market prices.” Econometrica, 59(5): 1279–1313.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  26. Markowitz, H.M. (1959). Portfolio Selection Cowles Monograph 16. New York: Wiley, Chapter 14.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mossin, J. (1966). “Equilibrium in a capital market.” Econometrica, 34: 768–783.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  28. Peters, E.E. (1991). Chaos and Order in the Capital Markets: A New View of Cycles, Prices and Market Volatility. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Radcliffe, R.C. (1990). Investment: Concepts, Analysis, and Strategy, 3rd edn. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Reilly, F.K. (1986). Investments, 2nd edn. Chicago, IL: The Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sharpe, W.F. (1964). “Capital asset price: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk.” The Journal of Finance, 19(3): 425–442.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sharpe, W.F. (1966). “Mutual fund performance.” Journal of Business Supplement on Security Prices, 39: 119–138.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tobin, J. (1958). “Liquidity preference as behavior toward risk.” The Review of Economic Studies, 26(1): 65–86.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  34. Treynor, J.L. (1965). “How to rate management of investment funds.” Harvard Business Review, 43: 63–75.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wagner, W.H. and Lau, S.T. (1971). “The effect of diversification on risk.” Financial Analysts Journal, 27(5): 48–53.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this entry

Cite this entry

Hung, K., Yang, CW., Means, D.B. (2006). A note on the relationship among the portfolio performance indices under rank transformation. In: Lee, CF., Lee, A.C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Finance. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-26336-6_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-26336-6_47

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-26284-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-26336-6

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics

Publish with us

Policies and ethics