Translating Science into Clinical Practice
In this chapter, we propose a developmental framework of competencies for the integration of science and practice. We believe a shortcoming of traditional competency models stems from the tendency to view science and practice as distinct entities that need to be linked rather than addressing their dialectical relationship. We argue that competencies for translating science into practice must acknowledge the inexorable link between the two. To accomplish this conceptual shift, we articulate the knowledge, attitudes, and skills necessary to define competencies pertinent to the realization of the scientist-practitioner. Four primary attitudes outlined include scientific mindedness, curiosity about how things work/what works, acceptance of ambiguity, and embracing the dialectical nature of science and practice. Core domains of knowledge identified include an understanding of scientific methods, familiarity with clinical intervention research, understanding the role of evidence based practice, and specification of clinical practices. We also propose skills necessary for the translation of science into practice. Skills include assessing scientific findings, consuming research through a levels of evidence lens, practicing research based clinical intervention protocols, and becoming a local scientist. We believe these three domains encompass both basic and expert competencies that are necessary for learning, developing, and functioning as a profession within the scientist-practitioner paradigm.
KeywordsAmerican Psychological Association Clinical Question Core Attitude Cognitive Behavioral Technique Sociocultural Variable
- Alexander, J. F., Sexton, T. L., & Robbins, M. S. (2002). The developmental status of family therapy in family psychology. In Liddle, H. A., Santisteban, D. A., Levant, R., & Bray, J. (Eds.), Family psychology: Science-based interventions (pp. 17–40). Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
- Alexander, J. F., & Sexton, T. L. (2003). Functional Family Therapy: A mature clinical model for working with at-risk adolescents and their families. Handbook of Family Therapy. New York and Hove: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
- American Psychological Association. (2005a). Policy statement on evidence-based practice in psychology. Retrieved January 10, 2009 from http://www.apa.org/practice/ebpstatement.pdf.
- American Psychological Association. (2005b, July). Report of the 2005 presidential task force on evidence-based practice. Retrieved January 10, 2009, from http://www.apa.org/practice/ebpreport.pdf.
- American Psychological Association. (2007, June). Assessment of competency benchmarks work group: A developmental model for defining and measuring competence in professional psychology. Retrieved January 10, 2009, from http://www.apa.org/ed/graduate/comp_benchmark.pdf.
- Aos, S., & Barnoski, R. (1998). Watching the bottom line: Cost-effective interventions for reducing crime in Washington. RCW: Washington State Institute for Public Policy, 13.40.500.Google Scholar
- Benner, P. (2001). From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Committee on Training in Clinical Psychology (1947). Recommended graduate training program in clinical psychology. American Psychologist, 2, 539–558.Google Scholar
- Raimy, V. (Ed.) (1950). Training in clinical psychology. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Sexton, T. L., Alexander, J. F., & Mease, A. L. (2004). Levels of evidence for the models and mechanisms of therapeutic change in family and couple therapy. In Lambert, M. J. (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (5th ed., pp. 590–646). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Sexton, T. L., Coop-Gordon, K., Gurman, A. S., Lebow, J. L., Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Johnson, S. (2007). Evidence-based treatments in couple and family psychology: Report of the Task Force on Evidence-based Treatments in Family Psychology. Division 43, Family Psychology American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Wampold, B. E. (2001). The great psychotherapy debate. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar