Advertisement

Qualitative Research

  • Donald E. Polkinghorne

Abstract:

Qualitative research refers to the group of inquiry approaches developed to produce knowledge about the experiential realm of human beings. The focus of these approaches is on describing and understanding the meanings people attach to their encounters with other people, their cultural environment, and material objects. Qualitative research holds that the organization and content of the human experiential realm more closely resembles that of natural language rather than numbers. Qualitative studies generate data in the form of participant descriptions of their experiences and use literary analytic procedures to produce higher-order descriptions and understandings of the investigated experience. Qualitative studies produce a different kind of knowledge than quantitative studies. Its studies are concerned to examine the depth and fullness of its topic of interest. Because of the kind of knowledge produced by qualitative research, it is grounded in a different ontological and epistemological base than quantitative research. Understanding and practicing qualitative research requires that students do not simply transfer quantitative research principles to qualitative studies, but approach gaining competency in qualitative research from within its own perspective. There are two levels of competency in qualitative research – the basic level and the expert level. Basic level competency includes knowledge about qualitative research including its philosophy of knowledge, its area of study, the tools and techniques it uses, and its traditions. A student who achieves a basic level competency should be able to read and understand a qualitative research report. Expert level competency is an advance beyond the basic level in that, in addition to understanding, it concerns mastery of the skills needed to conduct a qualitative study. These are practice skills and include mastery of in-depth qualitative interviewing and observation, mastery of analytic skills of data in linguistic form, and mastery of communicating results transparently. Mastery of expert competency is achieved by advancement through various stages of skill development to reach a level of expertise. A student who has achieved expert competency should be able to conduct a worthy qualitative study.

The term qualitative research refers to a collection of linguistically based social science research approaches that focus on the study of the human experiential realm. The modern-day practice of qualitative research can be traced to its emergence in the 1970s as part of a reform movement in the social sciences (Schwandt, 2000). The reformers were interested in studying the meanings and values through which people understood and made sense of their encounters with the world, with others, and with themselves. They held that the then current mainstream social science methods, with their commitment to a numeric form of data and to statistical analyses, were inadequate for understanding human existence as it was experienced by persons. The reformers proposed that a research approach that was language-based, rather than numeric-based, would allow for deeper and more nuanced knowledge of human experience. In their development of language-based research, the reformers retrieved and revised earlier attempts at such a research, for example, anthropological field studies and University of Chicago symbolic interaction studies. In the decades since 1970, qualitative- or linguistic-based research has become an important component in the repertoire of social science inquiry methods.

Keywords

Qualitative Study Qualitative Research Qualitative Approach Numeric Form Qualitative Researcher 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th, text revision ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  2. Ashworth, P. D., Giorgi, A., & de Koning, A. J. J. (Eds.). (1986). Qualitative research in psychology. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Azar, B. (2008). Qualitative research is gaining ground and respect. gradPSYCH, 6(1), Retrieved from http://gradpsych.apags.org/jan08/upclose.html.
  4. Banister, P., Burman, E., Parker, I., Taylor, M., & Tindall, C. (1994). Qualitative methods in psychology: A research guide. Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Barbour, R. S., & Kitzinger, J. (Eds.). (1999). Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Bazerman, C. (1987). Codifying the social scientific style: The APA Publication Manual as a behaviorist rhetoric. In Nelson, J. S., Megill, A., & McCloskey, D. N. (Eds.), The rhetoric of the human sciences: Language and argument in scholarship and public affairs (pp. 125–144). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  7. Benner, P. (1984). From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  8. Benner, P. (Ed.). (1994). Interpretative phenomenology: Embodiment, caring, and ethics in health and illness. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  10. Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Brentano, F. (1874/1995). Psychology from an empirical standpoint. (Rancurello, A. C., Terrel, D. B., & McAlister, L. L. Trans.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2007a). Grounded theory in historical perspective: An epistemological account. In Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K., (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory (pp. 31–57). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2007b). The sage handbook of grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Camic, P. M., Rhodes, J. E., & Yardley, L. (Eds.). (2003). Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  15. Carter, J. W. (2006). A phenomenal topology of positive interpersonal emotions (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, 2006). Dissertation Abstracts International, 68, 1980.Google Scholar
  16. Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Charon, J. M. (2004). Symbolic interactionsim (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  18. Clandinin, D. J. (Ed.). (2007). Handbook of narrative inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Damasio, A. (1994). Decartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Avon.Google Scholar
  23. David, G., Gough, B., & Parker, M. (Eds.). (2003–2008). Qualitative research in psychology. Philadelphia: Taylor-Francis.Google Scholar
  24. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Derrida, J. (1990/2003). The problem of genesis in Husserl’s philosophy. (Hobson, M. trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Dey, I. (1993). Qualitative data analysis: A user-friendly guide for social scientists. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Dreyfus, S. E., & Dreyfus, H. L. (1980). A five-stage model of the mental activities involved in directed skill acquisition. University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
  28. Fechner, G. T. (1860/1966). Elements of psychophysics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  29. Fieldling, N. G., & Lee, R. M. (1998). Computer analysis and qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Freud, S. (1895/1966). Studies in hysteria. New York: Avon.Google Scholar
  31. Gardner, H. (1985). The mind’s new science. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  32. Geertz, C. (1973). Interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  33. Gelso, C. J., & Hayes, J. A. (1998). The psychotherapy relationship: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  34. Giorgi, A. (1970a). Psychology as a human science. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  35. Giorgi, A. (1970b). Toward a phenomenologically based research in psychology. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 1(1), 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1965). Awareness of dying. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  37. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  38. Greenberg, J. (1964). I never promised you a rose garden. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  39. Griffen, C., & Bengry-Howell, A. (2008). Ethnography. In Willig, C., & Stainton-Rogers, W. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 15–31). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of interview research: Context and method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Hempel, C. G. (1965). Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  42. Hergenhahn, B. R. (1997). An introduction to the history of psychology (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  43. Holton, J. A. (2007). The coding process and its challenges. In Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory (pp. 265–310). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. Husserl, E. (1925/1977). Phenomenological psychology (Scanlon, J. Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  45. Husserl, E. (1937/1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental psychology (Carr, D. Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  46. James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  47. James, W. (1890/1950). The principles of psychology: Vol. 1. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  48. James, W. (1902). The varieties of religious experience. New York: Longmans, Green & Company.Google Scholar
  49. Jonas, H. (1966). The phenomenon of life: Toward a philosophical biology. Westwood, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  50. Jorgensen, D. L. (1989). Participant observation: A methodology for human studies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  51. Kant, I. (1781/1965). Critique of pure reason (Smith, N. K. Trans. Unabridged ed.). New York: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
  52. Kubler-Ross, E. (1969). On death and dying. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  55. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Levin, D. M. (Ed.). (1993). Modernity and the hegemony of vision. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  57. Lewins, A., & Silver, C. (2007). Using software in qualitative research: A step-by-step guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  58. Martin, M., Sadlo, G., & Stew, G. (2006). The phenomenon of boredom. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. McCabe, M. (2003). The paradox of loss: Toward a relational theory of grief. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  61. Meeker, M. A. (2004). Surrogate decision-making at the end of life. Qualitative Health Care Research, 13(1), 100–113.Google Scholar
  62. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945/1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). New York: Humanities.Google Scholar
  63. Mishler, E. G. (1986). Research interviewing: Context and narrative. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Morgan, D. L. (1997). The focus group kit. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  65. Morse, J. M. (2007). Sampling in grounded theory. In Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (Eds.), The sage handbook of grounded theory (pp. 229–244). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  66. Nagel, T. (1970). What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review, 79, 394–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pak, J. H. (2006). Korean American women stories of acculturation and changing selfs. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  68. Parker, I. (2005). Qualitative psychology: Introducing radical research. Berkshire, England: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  69. Patton, M. Q. (1980). Qualitative evaluation methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  70. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  71. Petitot, J., Varela, F. J., Pachoud, B., & Roy, J.-M. (Eds.). (1999). Naturalizing phenomenology: Issues in contemporary phenomenology and cognitive science. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child (M. Cook, Trans.). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  73. Polkinghorne, D. E. (1983). Methodology for the human sciences: Systems of inquiry. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  74. Polkinghorne, D. E. (1989). Phenomenological research methods. In Valle, R. S., & Halling, S. (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological perspectives in psychology (pp. 41–60). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  75. Polkinghorne, D. E. (2005). Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Polkinghorne, D. E. (2007). Validity in narrative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(2), 471–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Potter, W. J. (1996). An analysis of thinking and research about qualitative methods. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  78. Ramesh, S. (2005). Integration of science and practice: A collective case study of scientist-practitioner programs in counseling psychology (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, 2004). Dissertation Abstracts International, 66, 2116.Google Scholar
  79. Ricoeur, P. (2004). Memory, history, forgetting. (Blamey, K., & Pellauer, D. Trans.). Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  81. Saussure, F. D. (1907–1911/1966). Course in general linguistics. (Baskin, W. Trans.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  82. Schwandt, T. A. (2000). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretation, hermeneutics, and social construction. In Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 189–213). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  83. Schwandt, T. A. (2007). The Sage dictionary of qualitative inquiry (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  84. Seale, C., Gobo, G., Gubrium, J. F., & Silverman, D. (Eds.). (2004). Qualitative research practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  85. Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  86. Shavelson, R. J., & Towne, L. (Eds.). (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  87. Smith, J. A. (Ed.). (2003). Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  88. Smith, L. D. (1986). Behaviorism and logical positivism: A reassessment of the alliance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  89. Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. New York: Falmer.Google Scholar
  90. Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.Google Scholar
  91. Titchener, E. B. (1896). An outline of psychology. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  92. van Kaam, A. (1969). Existential foundations of psychology. Garden City, NY: Image Books.Google Scholar
  93. Vosniadou, S., & Ortony, A. (Eds.). (1989). Similarity and analogical reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  94. Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  95. Wenger, E. (1988). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  96. Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  97. Willig, C. (2001). Introducing qualitative research in psychology: Adventures in theory and method. Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  98. Willig, C., & Stainton-Rogers, W. (Eds.). (2008). The sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  99. Wolcott, H. F. (1994). Transforming qualitative data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  100. Wolcott, H. F. (2001). Writing up qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  101. Wundt, W. (1900–1920). Völkerpsychologie [group psychology]: Vol. 1–10. Leipzig, Germany: Engelmann.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald E. Polkinghorne
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Southern California-Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations