Advertisement

Behavioral Assessment with Adults

  • William H. O’Brien
  • Carmen K. Oemig
  • Jebediah J. Northern

Abstract:

Behavioral assessment is an approach to the measurement and understanding of human behavior that requires several conceptual and clinical competencies. Basic conceptual competencies in behavioral assessment include a well-developed knowledge of empiricism, learning theories, idiographic measurement strategies, behavioral change processes, and multivariate causality. Behavioral assessment also requires familiarity with psychometric principles such as norms, reliability, and validity. Basic clinical competencies in behavioral assessment are two-fold. One set of basic clinical competencies subsumes information gathering methods such as interviewing, behavioral observation, self-monitoring, and self-report inventory use. The other centers on the generation of topographical and functional analyses of behavior that can be used to guide treatment design. In addition, the evolution and expansion of the behavioral tradition has created a need for expert-level conceptual and clinical competencies in behavioral assessment. Expert conceptual competencies in behavioral assessment center on familiarity with recent “third wave” advances in the philosophical, theoretical, and empirical foundations of behavioral assessment and behavior therapy. Expert clinical competencies require familiarity with decision-making processes, the fallibilities of clinical judgment, and the quantitative strategies that can be used to aid clinical decision-making and case formulation in behavioral assessment.

Keywords

Contextual Factor Nursing Staff Target Behavior Behavioral Assessment Clinical Competency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Acklin, M. W., McDowell, C. J., Verschell, M. S., & Chan, D. (2000). Interobserver agreement, interobserver reliability, and the Rorschach comprehensive system. Journal of Personality Assessment, 74, 15–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anthony, J. L., & O’Brien, W. H. (1999). An evaluation of the impact of social support manipulations on cardiovascular reactivity to laboratory stressors. Behavioral Medicine, 25, 78–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arkes, H. R. (1981). Impediments to accurate clinical judgment and possible ways to minimize their impact. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 323–330.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  5. Bernert, R. A., Merrill, K. A., Braithwaite, S. R., Van Orden, K. A., & Joiner, T. E. (2007). Family life stress and insomnia symptoms in a prospective evaluation of young adults. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 58–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bond, M. (2004). Empirical studies of defense style: Relationships with psychopathology and change. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 12, 263–278.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butler, A. C., Chapman, J. E., Forman, E. M., & Beck, A. T. (2006). The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 17–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chapman, L. J., & Chapman, J. P. (1969). Illusory correlation as an obstacle to the use of valid psychodiagnostic signs. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 74, 271–280.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  10. Durand, V. M. (1990). Severe behavior problems: A functional communication training approach. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  11. Einhorn, H. J. (1988). Diagnosis and causality in clinical and statistical prediction. In Turk, D. C., & Salovey, P. (Eds.), Reasoning, inference, and judgment in clinical psychology (pp. 51–70). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  12. Elliot, A. J., Miltenberger, R. G., Kaster-Bundgaard, J., & Lumley, V. (1996). A national survey of assessment and therapy techniques used by behavior therapists. Cognitive and Behavior Practice, 3, 107–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Exner, J. E. (1986). The Rorschach: A comprehensive system (Vol. 1). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Exner, J. E. (1991). The Rorschach: A comprehensive system (Vol. 2). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Exner, J. E., & Sendin, C. (1997). Some issues in Rorschach research. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 13, 155–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Felton, J. L., & Nelson, R. O. (1984). Inter-assessor agreement on hypothesized controlling variables and treatment proposals. Behavioral Assessment, 6, 199–208.Google Scholar
  17. Fenichel, O. (1945). Psychoanalytic theory of neurosis. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  18. Fletcher, L., & Hayes, S. C. (2005). Relational frame theory, acceptance, and commitment therapy, and a functional analytic definition of mindfulness. Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive Therapy, 23, 315–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frank, G. (1993). On the validity of hypotheses derived from the Rorschach: The relationship between color and affect. Psychological Reports, 73, 12–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Garb, H. (1999). Call for a moratorium on the use of the Rorschach inkblot test in clinical and forensic settings. Assessment, 6, 313–317.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Garb, H. (2005). Clinical judgment and decision making. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 67–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Garb, H. N. (1996). Studying the clinician: Judgment research and psychological assessment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  23. Gottman, J. M., & Roy, A. K. (1990). Sequential analysis: A guide for behavioral researchers. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hartman, D. P., & Wood, D. D. (1990). Observational methods. In Bellack, A. S., Hersen, M., & Kazdin, A. E. (Eds.), International handbook of behavior modification and therapy (2nd ed., pp. 107–138). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hay, W. M., Hay, L. R., Angle, H. V., & Nelson, R. O. (1979). The reliability of problem identification in the behavioral interview. Behavioral Assessment, 1, 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hayes, S. C. (2004). Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, and the third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies. Behavior Therapy, 35, 639–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hayes, S. C., Follette, V. M., & Linehan, M. M. (2004). Mindfulness and acceptance: expanding the cognitive- behavioral tradition. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes and outcomes. Behavior Research and Therapy, 44, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  30. Haynes, S. N. (1992). Models of causality in psychopathology: Toward synthetic, dynamic, and nonlinear models of causality in psychopathology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  31. Haynes, S. N., & O’Brien, W. H. (1990). The functional analysis in behavior therapy. Clinical Psychology Review, 10, 649–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Haynes, S. N., & O’Brien, W. H. (2000). Principles and practice of behavioral assessment. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hox, J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  34. Hull, C. L. (1952). A behavior system: An introduction to behavior theory concerning the individual organism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Iwata, B. A., Smith, R. G., & Michael, J. (2000). Current research on the influence of establishing operations on behavior in applied settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 411–418.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jacobson, N., Martell, C. R., & Dimidjian, S. (2001). Behavioral activation for depression: Returning to contextual roots. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 8, 255–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. James, L. R., Mulaik, S. A., & Brett, J. M. (1982). Causal analysis: Assumptions, models, and data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Kearney, C. A., & Silverman, W. K. (1990). A preliminary analysis of a functional model of assessment and treatment for school refusal behavior. Behavior Modification, 14, 340–366.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kleinmuntz, B. (1990). Why we still use our heads instead of formulas: Toward an integrative approach. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 296–310.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kohlenberg, R. J., Kanter, J. W., Bolling, M., Wexner, R., Parker, C., & Tsai, M. (2004). Functional analytic psychotherapy, cognitive therapy, and acceptance. In Hayes, S. C., Follette, V. M., & Linehan, M. M. (Eds.), Mindfulness and acceptance: Expanding the cognitive-behavioral tradition (pp. 96–119). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  41. Korotitsch, W. J., & Nelson-Gray, R. O. (1999). An overview of self-monitoring research in assessment and treatment. Psychological Assessment, 11, 415–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Laplanche, J., & Pontalis, J. B. (1973). The language of psychoanalysis. London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
  43. Lilienfeld, S. O., Wood, J. M., & Garb, H. N. (2000). The scientific status of projective techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1, 27–66.Google Scholar
  44. Linehan, M. M. (1993). Skills training manual for treating borderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  45. Linehan, M. M., Comtois, K. A., Murray, A. M., Brown, M. Z., Gallop, R. J., Heard, H. L., et al. (2006). Two-year randomized controlled trial and follow-up of dialectical behavior therapy versus therapy by experts for suicidal behaviors and borderline personality disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 63, 757–766.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Matyas, T. A., & Greenwood, K. M. (1990). Visual analysis of single-case time series: Effects of variability, serial dependence, and magnitude of intervention effect. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 341–351.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Munce, S. E., Stansfeld, S. A., Blackmore, E., & Stewart, D. E. (2007). The role of depression and chronic pain conditions in absenteeism: Results from a national epidemiological survey. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 49, 1206–1211.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. O’Brien, W. H. (1995). Inaccuracies in the estimation of functional relationships using self-monitoring data. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 26, 351–357.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. O’Brien, W. H., & Haynes, S. N. (1993). Behavioral assessment in the psychiatric setting. In Bellack, A. S., & Hersen, M. (Eds.), Handbook of behavior therapy in the psychiatric setting (pp. 39–73). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  50. O’Brien, W. H., & Haynes, S. N. (1995). A functional analytic approach to the assessment and treatment of a child with frequent migraine headaches. In Session: Psychotherapy in Practice, 1, 65–80.Google Scholar
  51. O’Brien, W. H., McGrath, J. J., & Haynes, S. N. (2003). Assessment of psychopathology: Behavioral approaches. In Graham, J., & Naglieri, J. (Eds.), Handbook of psychological assessment (pp. 509–529). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  52. O’Brien, W. H., Kaplar, M., & McGrath, J. J. (2004). Broadly-based causal models of behavior disorders. In Hersen, M., Haynes, S. N., & Heiby, E. M. (Eds.), Handbook of psychological assessment: Vol. 3. Behavioral assessment (pp. 69–93). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  53. Schlundt, D. G. (1985). An observational methodology for functional analysis. Bulletin for the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 4, 234–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Segal, Z. V., Williams, J. M., & Teasdale, J. D. (2002). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression: A new approach to preventing relapse. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  55. Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. Oxford, England: Appleton-Century.Google Scholar
  56. Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. Oxford, England: Knopf.Google Scholar
  57. Skinner, B. F. (1986). Why I am not a cognitive psychologist. In Terry, L., & Robertson, L. (Eds.), Approaches to cognition: Contrasts and controversies (pp. 79–90). Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.Google Scholar
  58. Skinner, B. F. (1990). Can psychology be a science of the mind? American Psychologist, 45, 1206–1210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tsai, M., Kohlenberg, R., Kanter, J. W., Kohlenberg, B., Follette, W. C., & Callighan, G. M. (2008). A guide to functional analytic psychotherapy: Awareness, courage, love, and behaviorism. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  60. Watson, J. B. (1919). Psychology from the standpoint of a behaviorist. Philadelphia: Lippincott.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Watson, G. S., & Gross, A. M. (1999). Behavior therapy. In Hersen, M., & Bellack, A. S. (Eds.), Comparative interventions for adult disorders (2nd ed., pp. 25–47). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  62. Wei, W. S. (1990). Time series analysis: Univariate and multivariate methods. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  63. Wolpe, J. (1952a). Experimental neurosis as learned behavior. British Journal of Psychology, 43, 243–268.Google Scholar
  64. Wolpe, J. (1952b). The formation of negative habits: A neurophysiological view. Psychological Review, 59, 290–299.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wolpe, J. (1958). Psychotherapy by reciprocal inhibition. Oxford, England: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Wolpe, J. (1963). Psychotherapy: The nonscientific heritage and the new science. Behavior Research and Therapy, 1, 23–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wolpe, J. (1997). From psychoanalytic to behavioral methods in anxiety disorders: A continuing evolution. In Zeig, J. K. (Ed.), The evolution of psychotherapy: The third conference (pp. 107–116). Philadelphia: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  68. Wolpe, J., & Lazarus, A. A. (1966). Behavior therapy techniques: A guide to the treatment of neuroses. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  69. Wolpe, J., Salter, A., & Reyna, L. J. (1964). The conditioning therapies. Oxford, England: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  70. Zachariae, R., Paulsen, K., Jensen, A., Johansson, A., & Vonder Maase, H. (2007). Anticipatory nausea: The role of individual differences related to sensory perception and autonomic reactivity. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 33, 69–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • William H. O’Brien
    • 1
  • Carmen K. Oemig
    • 1
  • Jebediah J. Northern
    • 1
  1. 1.Bowling Green State UniversityBowling GreenUSA

Personalised recommendations