Advertisement

Cognitive Assessment with Children

  • Jennifer R. Bailey
  • Alan M. Gross
Reference work entry

Abstract:

The aim of this chapter was to provide a comprehensive overview of the process of child cognitive in children. Following a brief overview of the area, basic clinician competencies were discussed. The four core areas of clinician competency outlined by the APA task force were delineated. These areas include having a basic understanding of psychometric theory; knowledge of ethnic, racial, cultural, gender, age, and linguistic variables; knowledge of how to test individuals with disabilities; and supervised experience. Following this brief discussion, an example of a basic psychoeducational test battery was explored. Test administration guidelines, test selection, and test interpretations were discussed. Additionally, suggestions were provided for enhancing rapport with the child and increasing the readability of the written assessment report. An overview of a typical assessment report was also provided. This example offered a broad picture of the assessment process, beginning with identifying the referral question, the child’s background (general, educational, family history, medical background, and psychological factors), behavioral observations, and presenting the test results. A discussion on clinician competency in ethnic and cultural issues, gender and age, and linguistic variables was also offered. Another section of the chapter highlighted factors associated with the development of expert assessment competencies. Clinician competency was explored in the context of the examination of test batteries for several of the most common types of child assessments. The section on expert competency ended with a trajectory for obtaining the necessary skills to proficiently work with children. Finally, suggestions concerning how best to provide the training clinicians need to achieve competency were explored.

Keywords

Intelligence Quotient Cognitive Assessment Clinician Competency American Educational Research Association Test Administration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Allen, A., Montgomery, M., Tubman, J., Frazier, L., & Escovar, L. (2003). The effects of assessment feedback on rapport-building and self-enhancement processes. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 25, 165–182.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, J. B., & Gross, A. M. (1994). Children. In Hersen, M., & Turner, S. M. (Eds.), Diagnostic interviewing (2nd ed., pp. 305–326). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  3. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association (APA), & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards fo educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  4. American Psychological Association (APA). (2000). Report of the task force on test user qualifications. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  5. American Psychological Association (APA). (2001). Guidelines and principles: Accreditation of postdoctoral training programs in clinical child psychology. Retrieved August 20, 2008, from: http://www.cospp.org/docs/CCPAccredit.pdf
  6. American Psychological Association (APA). (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  7. American Psychological Association (APA). (2003). Guidelines on multicultural, education, training, research, practice, and organizational change for psychologists. American Psychologist, 58, 377–402.Google Scholar
  8. American Psychological Association (APA). (2007). COA guidelines on accreditation: guidelines and principles for accreditation of programs in professional psychology. Retrieved August, 8, 2008, from http://www.apa.org/ed/accreditation/G&P0522.pdf
  9. Barker, P. (1990). Clinical interviews with children and adolescents. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  10. Berninger, V. W., & O’Donnell, L. (2005). Research-supported differential diagnosis of specific learning disabilities. In Prifitera, A., Saklofske, D. H., & Weiss, L. G. (Eds.), WISC-IV clinical use and interpretations: Scientist-practitioner perspectives (pp. 189–234). Boston: Elsevier Academic.Google Scholar
  11. Boggs, K. M., Griffin, R. S., & Gross, A. M. (2003). Children. In Hersen, M. (Ed.), Diagnostic interviewing (pp. 393–413). New York: Kluwer/Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Braden, J. P. (2005). Hard-of-hearing and deaf clients: Using the WISC-IV with clients who are Hard-of-Hearing. In Prifitera, A., Saklofske, D. H., & Weiss, L. G. (Eds.), WISC-IV clinical use and interpretations: Scientist-practitioner perspectives (pp. 351–380). Boston: Elsevier Academic.Google Scholar
  13. Clay, R. A. (2006). Assessing assessment: Psychological assessment enjoys new respect, applications and approaches. Monitory on Psychology, 37, 44–48.Google Scholar
  14. Clemence, A. J., & Handler, L. (2001). Psychological assessment on internship: A survey of training directors and their expectations for students. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76, 18–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen, R. J., & Swerdlik, M. E. (2005). Psychological testing and assessment (6th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  16. Dombrowski, S. C., Kamphaus, R. W., & Reynolds, C. R. (2004). After the demise of the discrepancy: Proposed learning disabilities diagnostic criteria. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35, 364–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ecklund, K., & Johnson, W. B. (2007). Toward cultural competence in child intake assessments. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38, 356–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Edelbrock, C. (1984). Developmental considerations. In Ollendick, T. H., & Hersen, M. (Eds.), Child behavioral assessment: Principles and procedures (pp. 20–37). New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  19. Geffken, G. R., Keeley, M. L., Kellison, I., Storch, E. A., & Rodrigue, J. R. (2006). Parental adherence to child psychologists’ recommendations from psychological testing. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 37, 499–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Groth-Marnat, G. (2003). Handbook of psychological assessment (4th ed.). Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. Groth-Marnat, G., & Horvath, L. S. (2006). The psychological report: A review of current controversies. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 73–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harvey, V. S. (2006). Variables affecting the clarity of psychological reports. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 5–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kaufman, A. S., & Reynolds, C. R. (1984). In Ollendick, T. H., & Hersen, M. (Eds.), Child Behavioral assessment: Principles and procedures (pp. 195–220). New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  24. Krishnamurthy, R., VandeCreek, L., Kaslow, N. J., Tazeau, Y. N., Miville, M. L., Kerns, R., Stegman, R., Suzuki, L., & Benton, S. A. (2004). Achieving competency in psychological assessment: Directions for education and training. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 725–739.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leon, R. L. (1989). Psychiatric interviewing: A primer. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  26. Li, S. T., Jenkins, S., & Sundsmo, A. (2007). Impact of race and ethnicity. In Hersen, M., & Turner, S. (Eds.), Adult psychopathology and diagnosis (pp. 101–121). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Mash, E. J., & Wolfe, D. A. (2005). Abnormal child psychology. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsoworth.Google Scholar
  28. McQueen, W., Meschino, R., Pike, P., & Poelstra, P. (1994). Improving graduate student performance in cognitive assessment: The saga continues. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 25, 283–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. National Center for Educational Statistics. (2007). U. S. department of education, office of special education and rehabilitative services (OSERS), office of special education programs (OSEP), data analysis system (DANS), 1976–2006. Retrieved July 1, 2008, from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/2008/section1/table.asp?tableID = 867
  30. Proctor, B., & Prevatt, F. (2003). Agreement among four models used for diagnosing learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 459–466.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Roberts, M. C., Erickson, M. T., La Greca, A. M., Russ, S. W., Vargas, L. A., Carlson, C. I., Friedman, R. M., Lemanek, K. L., Schroeder, C. S., & Wohlford, P. F. (1998). A model for training psychologists to provide services for children and adolescents. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 29, 293–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Roberts, M. C., Erickson, M. T., & Tuma, J. M. (1985). Addressing the needs: Guidelines for training psychologists to work with children, youth, and families. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 14, 70–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sattler, J. M. (2008). Assessment of children: Cognitive foundations. San Diego, CA: Jerome M. Sattler.Google Scholar
  34. Schwean, V. L., & Saklofske, D. H. (2005). Assessment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder with the WISC-IV. In Prifitera, A., Saklofske, D. H., & Weiss, L. G. (Eds.), WISC-IV clinical use and interpretations: Scientist-practitioner perspective (pp. 235–280). Boston: Elsevier Academic.Google Scholar
  35. Snyder, C. R., Ritschel, L. A., Rand, K. L., & Berg, C. J. (2006). Balancing psychological assessments: Including strengths and hope in client reports. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 33–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sparrow, S. S., Pfeiffer, S. I., & Newman, T. M. (2005). Assessment of children who are gifted with the WISC-IV. In Prifitera, A., Saklofske, D. H., & Weiss, L. G. (Eds.), WISC-IV clinical use and interpretations: Scientist-practitioner perspectives (pp. 281–298). Boston: Elsevier Academic.Google Scholar
  37. Turner, S. M., DeMers, S. T., Fox, R. H., & Reed, G. M. (2001). APA’s guidelines for test user qualifications. American Psychologist, 56, 1099–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. United States Bureau of the Census. (1996, February). Current population reports: Population projections of the United States by age, sex, race, and hispanic origin: 1995 to 2050. Retrieved July 29, 2008, from http://www.census.gov/prod/1/pop/p25–1130.pdf
  39. Wiig, E. K. (2005). Language disabilities. In Prifitera, A., Saklofske, D. H., & Weiss, L. G. (Eds.), WISC-IV clinical use and interpretations: Scientist-practitioner perspectives (pp. 333–349). Boston: Elsevier Academic.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer R. Bailey
    • 1
  • Alan M. Gross
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MississippiUniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations