Skip to main content

Construction applications

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 19 Accesses

Due to their size and complexity, most construction projects would appear to offer a wide potential for MS/OR applications. For example, the standard critical path models of PERT, CPM and precedence diagrams are particularly successful in construction. However, apart from these models, we find that MS/OR are not often used in construction. Schelle (1990, p. 111) summarizes, “In project management the large number of publications about operations research topics contrast to the small number of real applications.”

Here, we review three major areas of construction where MS/OR applications could occur — job estimation and tendering, project planning, and project management and control. Factors inhibiting the application of MS/OR in construction projects are discussed and possible future developments are canvassed.

JOB ESTIMATION AND TENDERING

Some MS/OR models have been applied to job estimation. Job estimation requires trade-offs between time and cost. Early MS/OR work assumed direct...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   532.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bennett, J. and Ormerod, R. N. (1984). “Simulation applied to construction projects,” Construction Management and Economics, 2, 225–263.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brandon, P. S. (1990). “The development of an expert system for the strategic planning of construction projects,” Construction Management and Economics, 8, 285–300.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cusack, M. M. (1985). “A simplified approach to the planning and control of cost and project duration,” Construction Management and Economics, 3, 183–198.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Perry, C. and Iliffe, M. (1983). “Earthmoving on construction sites,” Interfaces, 13(1), 79–84.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Russell, J. S. (1992). “Decision models for analysis and evaluation of construction contractors,” Construction Management and Economics, 10, 185–202.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schelle, H. (1990). “Operations research and project management past, present and future,” in Reschke, H. and Schelle, H., eds., Dimensions of Project Management, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Scott, D. (1987). “Multi-objective economic evaluation of minor roading projects,” Construction Management and Economics, 5, 169–181.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Slowinski, R. and Weglarz, R., eds. (1989). Advances in Project Scheduling Studies in Production and Engineering Economics 9, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Touran A. and Toshyuki, A. (1987). “Simulation of tunnelling operations,” Construction Engineering and Management, 113, 554–568.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wager, D. M. and Pittard, S. J. (1991). Using Computers in Project Management, Construction Industry Computing Association, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this entry

Cite this entry

Perry, C. (2001). Construction applications . In: Gass, S.I., Harris, C.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-0611-X_159

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-0611-X_159

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-7827-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-0611-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics