Skip to main content
  • 25 Accesses

There is no one descriptive theory of human choice. Instead, there are different theoretically and empirically-based approaches for describing choice behavior. This paper briefly overviews five approaches: bounded rationality, prospect theory, choice strategies, recognition-primed decision making, and image theory. These approaches are descriptive in the sense that they describe certain aspects of how people actually make choices. They contrast with prescriptive approaches, such as decision analysis or other economic-based theories (or models) of choice behavior, which prescribe how one should make decisions, but do not necessarily describe choice behavior.

BOUNDED RATIONALITY

The concept of bounded rationality is attributed to Nobel laureate Herbert Simon (e.g., see Simon, 1955, 1979; also Hogarth, 1987), who argued that humans lack both the knowledge and computational skill required to make choices in a manner compatible with economic notions of rational behavior. The rational...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 532.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Beach, L. R. (1990). Image Theory: Decision Making in Personal and Organizational Contexts. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beach, L. R. (1993). “Image Theory: Personal and Organizational Decisions,” in Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods, Klein, G., Arisen, J., Calderwood, R., and Zsambok, C. E., eds., Ablex, Norwood, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hogarth, R. M. (1987). Judgment and Choice. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1979). “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Making Under Risk,” Econometrica. 47, 263–289.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Keeney, R. L. (1992). Value-Focused Thinking. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Klein, G. (1993). “A Recognition-Primed Decision (RPD) Model of Rapid Decision Making,” in Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods, Klein, G., Arisen, J., Calderwood, R., and Zsambok, C. E., eds., Ablex, Norwood, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., and Johnson, E. J. (1993). The Adaptive Decision Maker. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Simon, H. A. (1955). “A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99–118.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Simon, H. A. (1979). “Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations,” American Economic Review, 69, 493–513.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1981). “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice,” Science, 211, 453–458.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zsambok, C. E. and Klein, G. (1997). Naturalistic Decision Making. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this entry

Cite this entry

Adelman, L. (2001). Choice theory. In: Gass, S.I., Harris, C.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-0611-X_112

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-0611-X_112

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-7827-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-0611-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics