General Geology

1988 Edition

Atmogeochemical prospecting

  • A. S. Joyce
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-30844-X_6

This aspect of exploration geochemistry (q.v.) may be defined as prospecting on the basis of pathfinder atmosphile elements (q.v. in Vol. IVA) or compounds. Atmophile substances exist as gases under conditions of pressure and temperature that prevail near the Earth's surface and, therefore, seek to enter the atmosphere.

Because of the speed and economy with which aircraft or ground vehicles can sample the atmosphere, explorers have always hoped that atmogeochemical surveying procedures might be developed to search for ore deposits. Particular attention has centered on the use of Hg in sulfide prospecting, Rn in uranium prospecting, and hydrocarbons in petroleum prospecting. Useful results have been obtained for these gases using soil gas, gas dissolved in water, and gas entrapped in soil or rock. Limited technical success has resulted from the use of airborne or vehicle-borne detectors, but experiments are continuing. In addition to the desire for an airborne regional geochemical...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Andrews, J. N., and D. F. Wood, 1972, Mechanism of radon release in rock matrices and entry into ground-waters, Inst. Mining and Metallurgy Trans. 81, B206–209.Google Scholar
  2. Barringer, A. R., 1966, Interference-free spectrometer for high-sensitivity mercury analyses of soils, rocks and air, Inst. Mining and Metallurgy Trans. 75B, 120–124.Google Scholar
  3. Barringer, A. R., 1971, Optical detection of geochemical anomalies in the atmosphere, Canadian Inst. Mining and Metallurgy Spec. Vol. 11, 474.Google Scholar
  4. Caneer, W. T., and N. M. Saum, 1974, Radon emanometry in uranium exploration, Mining Eng. May, 26–29.Google Scholar
  5. Curtin, G. C., H. D. King, and E. L. Mosier, 1974, Movement of elements into the atmosphere from coniferous trees and subalpine forests of Colorado and Idaho, Jour. Geochem. Explor. 3, 245–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Devine, S. B. and H. W. Sears, 1975, Experiment in soil geochemical prospecting for petroleum, Della Gas Field, Cooper Basin, APEA Jour. 103–110.Google Scholar
  7. Eremeev, A. N., V. A. Sokolov, A. P. Solovov, and I. N. Yanitskii, 1973, Application of helium surveying to structural mapping and ore deposit forecasting, in M. J. Jones, ed., Geochemical Exploration, 1972. 183–192.Google Scholar
  8. Hadeishi, T. and R. D. McLaughlin, 1966, Hyperfine Zeeman effect atomic absorption spectrometer for mercury, Science 174, 404–407.Google Scholar
  9. Hatch, W. R. and W. L. Ott, 1968, Determination of sub-microgram quantities of mercury by atomic absorption spectrophotometry, Anal. Chemistry 40, 2085–2087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. James, C. H., and J. S. Webb,1964, Sensitive mercury vapour meter for use in geochemical prospecting, Inst. Mining and Metallurgy Trans. 73, 633–641.Google Scholar
  11. Levinson, A. A., 1974, Introduction to Exploration Geochemistry. Calgary: Applied Publ. Ltd., 612p.Google Scholar
  12. Ling, C., 1958, Portable atomic absorption photometer for determining nanogram quantities of mercury in the presence of interfering substances, Anal. Chemistry 40, 1876–1878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McCarthy, J. H., et al., 1969, Mercury in soil gas and air—a potential tool in mineral exploration, U.S. Geol. Survey. Circ. 609, 16p.Google Scholar
  14. McCrossan, R. G., and N. L. Ball, 1971, An evaluation of surface geochemical prospecting for petroleum, Caroline area, Alberta, Canadian Inst. Mining and Metallurgy Spec. Vol. 11, 529–536.Google Scholar
  15. McNerney, J. J., and P. R. Buseck, 1973, Geochemical exploration using mercury vapor, Econ. Geology 68, 313–1320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ovchinnikov, L. N., V. A. Sokolov, A. I. Fridman, and Yanitskii, I. N., 1973, Gaseous geochemical methods in structural mapping and prospecting for ore deposits, in M. J. Jones, ed., Geochemical Exploration 1972, 177–182.Google Scholar
  17. Poll, J. J. K., 1975, Onshore Gippsland geochemical survey: a test case for Australia, APEA Jour. pp. 93–101.Google Scholar
  18. Robbins, J. C., 1973, Zeeman spectrometer for measurement of atmospheric mercury vapour, in M. J. Jones, ed., Geochemical Exploration 1972. London: Institute Mining and Metallurgy.Google Scholar
  19. Sakrison, H. C., 1971, Rock geochemistry—its current usefulness on the Canadian Shield, Canadian Inst. Mining Metallurgy Bull. 64, 28–31Google Scholar
  20. Schwarzer, T. F., and J. A. S. Adams, 1973, Rock and soil discrimination by low altitude airborne gammaray spectrometry in Payne County, Oklahoma, Econ. Geology 68, 1297–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stevens, D. N., G. E. Rouse, and R. H. De Voto, 1971, Radon-222 in soil gas: three uranium exploration case histories in the western United States, Canadian Inst. Mining Metallurgy Spec. Vol. 11, 258–264.Google Scholar
  22. Vaughn, W. W., 1967, A simple mercury vapor detector for geochemical prospecting, U.S. Geol. Surv. Circ. 540, 8p.Google Scholar
  23. Weiss, O., 1971, Airborne geochemical prospecting, Canadian Inst. Mining and Metallurgy Spec. Vol. 11, 502–514.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Van Nostrand Reinhold Company Inc. 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. S. Joyce

There are no affiliations available