Skip to main content

Medical Pluralism

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of Medical Anthropology

Introduction

Medical systems in all human societies, regardless of whether they are indigenous or state-based, consist of a dyadic core consisting of a healer and a patient. Healers range from generalists, such as the shaman in indigenous societies or the proverbial family physician in modern societies, to specialists, such as the herbalist, bonesetter, midwife, or medium in preindustrial societies or the urologist, internist, or psychiatrist in modern societies. In contrast to indigenous societies, which tend to exhibit a more-or-less coherent medical system, state or complex societies exhibit the conflation of an array of medical systems—a phenomenon generally referred to by medical anthropologists, as well as medical sociologists and medical geographers, as medical pluralism. The medical system of a society consists of the totality of medical subsystems that coexist in a cooperative or competitive relationship with one another. Although much of the initial work that anthropologists...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Baer, H. A. (2001). Biomedicine and alternative healing systems in America: Issues of class, race, ethnicity, and gender. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brodwin, P. (1996). Medicine and morality in Haiti. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Chrisman, N. J., & Kleinman, A. (1983). Popular health care, social networks, and cultural meanings: The orientation of medical anthropology. In D. Mechanic (Ed.), Handbook of health, health care, and the health professions (pp. 569–580). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Crandon-Malamud, L. (1991). From the fat of our souls: Social change, political process, and medical pluralism in Bolivia. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dunn, F. (1976). Traditional Asian medicine and cosmopolitan medicine as adaptive systems. In C. Leslie (Ed.), Asian medical systems: A comparative study (pp. 133–158). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Elling, R. H. (1981). Political economy, cultural hegemony, and mixes of traditional and modern medicine. Social Science and Medicine, 15A, 89–99.

    Google Scholar 

  7. English-Lueck, J. A. (1990). Health in the New Age: A study in California health practices. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fabrega, Jr., H. (1997). Evolution of healing and sickness. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Frankenberg, R. (1980). Medical anthropology and development: A theoretical perspective. Social Science and Medicine, 14B, 197–207.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Janzen, J. (1978). The quest for therapy in lower Zaire. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Leslie, C. (1974). The modernization of Asian medical systems. In J. Poggie, Jr. & R. N. Lynch (Eds.), Rethinking modernization (pp. 69–107). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Leslie, C. (1976). Introduction. In C. Leslie (Ed.), Asian medical systems: A comparative study (pp. 1–12). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Leslie, C. (1977). Medical pluralism and legitimation in the Indian and Chinese medical systems. In D. Landy (Ed.), Culture, disease, and healing: Studies in medical anthropology (pp. 511–517). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Leslie, C. (1992). Interpretations of illness: Syncretism in modern Ayurveda. In C. Leslie & A. Young (Eds.), Paths to Asian medical knowledge (pp. 177–208). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lock, M. (1984). East Asian medicine in urban Japan: Varieties of medical experience. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Navarro, V. (1986). Crisis, health, and medicine: A social critique. New York: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Romanucci-Ross, L. (1977). The hierarchy of resort in curative practice: The Admirality Islands, Melanesia. In D. Landy (Ed.), Culture, disease, and healing: Studies in medical anthropology (pp. 481–487). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Singer, M., & Baer, H. A. (1995). Critical medical anthropology. Amityville, NY: Baywood.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stoner, B. P. (1986). Understanding medical systems: Traditional, modern, and syncretic health care alternatives in medically pluralistic societies. Medical Anthropology, 17(2), 44–48.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Strathern, A., & Stewart, P. J. (1999). Curing and healing: Medical anthropology in global perspective. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers

About this entry

Cite this entry

Baer, H.A. (2004). Medical Pluralism. In: Ember, C.R., Ember, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Medical Anthropology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-29905-X_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-29905-X_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-47754-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-29905-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics