Skip to main content

Alternative Set Theory

AST

  • Reference work entry
  • 105 Accesses

Alternative set theory has been created and, together with his colleagues at Charles Univ., developed by P. Vopěnka since the 1970s. In agreement with Husserl’s phenomenology, he based his theory on the natural world and the human view thereof.

The most important for any set theory is the way it treats infinity. A different approach to infinity forms the key difference between AST and classical set theories based on the Cantor set theory (CST). Cantor’s approach led to the creation of a rigid, abstract world with an enormous scale of infinite cardinalities while Vopěnka’s infinity, based on the notion of horizon, is more natural and acceptable.

Another source of inspiration were nonstandard models of Peano arithmetics with infinitely large (nonstandard) numbers. The way to build them in AST is easy and natural.

The basic references are [10], [11], [9].

Classes, Sets and Semisets

AST, as well as CST, builds on notions of’ set’, ‘class’, ‘element of a set’ and, in addition, introduces...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   1,699.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mlček, J.: ‘Valuation of structures’, Comment. Math. Univ. Carolinae20 (1979), 681–695.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Mlček, J.: ‘Some automorphisms of natural numbers in AST’, Comment. Math. Univ. Carolinae26 (1985), 467–475.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Sochor, A.: ‘Metamathematics of AST’, From the logical point of view1 (1992), 61–75.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sochor, A., and Pudlák, P.: ‘Models of AST’, J. Symbolic Logic49 (1984), 570–585.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Sochor, A., and Vopěnka, P.: ‘Endomorfic universes and their standard extensions’, Comm. Math. Univ. Carolinae20 (1979), 605–629.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Sochor, A., and Vopěnka, P.: ‘Ultrafilters of sets’, Comment. Math. Univ. Carolinae22 (1981), 698–699.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Trlifajová, K., and Vopěnka, P.: ‘Utility theory in AST’, Comment. Math. Univ. Carolinae26 (1985), 699–711.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Čuda, K.: ‘The consistency of measurability of projective semisets’, Comment. Math. Univ. Carolinae27 (1986), 103–121.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Čuda, K., Sochor, A., Vopěnka, P., and Zlatoš, P.: ‘Guide to AST’, Proc. First Symp. Mathematics in AST, Assoc. Slovak Mathematicians and Physicists, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vopénka, P.: Mathematics in AST, Teubner, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vopénka, P.: Introduction to mathematics in AST, Alfa Bratislava, 1989. (In Slovak.)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vopénka, P.: Calculus infinitesimalis-pars prima, Práh Praha, 1996. (In Czech.)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this entry

Cite this entry

Vopěnka, P., Trlifajová, K. (2001). Alternative Set Theory . In: Floudas, C.A., Pardalos, P.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Optimization. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48332-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48332-7_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-6932-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-48332-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics