Children’s Relations to the More-Than-Human World Beyond Developmental Views

Living reference work entry
Part of the Geographies of Children and Young People book series (GCYP, volume 9)

Abstract

In this chapter children’s relations to the more-than-human world are explored beyond the developmental framework of the autonomous individual child agent. The social and material, temporal, and spatial existence of a snow pile is used as an anchor – both a concrete and a conceptual one – in discussing an assemblage of more-than-individual subjectivities. It is argued that in viewing children’s activities in their everyday life surroundings only in terms of what they might mean – either to the children themselves or in relation to their development – we risk losing the part of our ongoing existence that cannot be mediated, the ongoingness that matters nevertheless. The ongoing mattering of a snow pile is discussed through taking into consideration the entire event, the sociomaterial assemblage that the children take part in, or exist as parts of, virtually seizing to be individual children for the duration of the event. When snow, children, wooly mittens, scarves, boots, snot, rocks, ice, frost, dark nights, and lampposts to name but a few partaking elements convene, they produce a shared deterritorialization. As result, the children in the midst can be thought of as if freed from being viewed as individual representatives of a developmental phase, freed from being viewed as “growing up,” and freed from one’s doings viewed as “meaning” something other than what sustains the activity.

Keywords

Snow Posthumanism Postdevelopmentalism Post-qualitative Voice Becoming-with 

References

  1. Banerjee, B., & Blaise, M. (2013). There’s something in the air: Becoming-with research practices. Cultural Studies <=> Critical Methodologies, 13(4), 240–245Google Scholar
  2. Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Blaise, M. (2005). Playing it straight!: Uncovering gender discourses in the early childhood classroom. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Burman, E. (2007). Deconstructing developmental psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Burman, E. (2011). Un/thinking children in development. In G. S. Cannella & L. D. Soto (Eds.), Childhoods. A handbook. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  8. Cannella, G. S. (1997). Deconstructing early childhood education. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Cannella, G. S., & Soto, L. D. (2010). Childhoods. A handbook. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  10. Castree, N. (2005). Nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Davies, B. (1996). Agency as a form of discursive practice: A classroom scene observed. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 17(1), 341–361.Google Scholar
  12. Davies, B., & Gannon, S. (2009). Pedagogical encounters. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  13. Ebersbach, M., Stiehler, S., & Asmus, P. (2011). On the relationship between children’s perspective taking in complex scenes and their spatial drawing ability. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29(3), 455–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Edwards, S., Blaise, M., & Hammer, M. (2009). Beyond developmentalism: Early childhood teachers’ understandings of multi-age grouping in early childhood education and care. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 34(4), 55–63.Google Scholar
  15. Fendler, F. (2001). Educating flexible souls: The construction of subjectivity through developmentality and interaction. In K. Hultqvist & G. Dahlberg (Eds.), Governing the child in the new millennium (pp. 119–142). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuck, P. (2011). Emerging approaches to educational research: Tracing the sociomaterial. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Graue, E. (2005). (De)centering the kindergarten prototype in the child-centered classroom. In S. Ryan & S. Grieshaber (Eds.), Practical transformations and transformational practices. Globalisation, postmodernism and early childhood education (pp. 39–58). New York: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hendrick, H. (1994). Child welfare: England 1872–1989. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hill, M., Davis, J., Prout, A., & Tisdall, K. (2004). Moving the participation agenda forward. Children and Society, 18(2), 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Horton, J. (2010). ‘The best thing ever’: How children’s popular culture matters. Social & Cultural Geography, 11(4), 377–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Horton, J., & Kraftl, P. (2006). Not just growing up, but going on: Materials, spacings, bodies, situations. Children’s Geographies, 4(3), 259–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Horton, J., Christensen, P., Kraftl, P., & Hadfield-Hill, S. (2013). ‘Walking … just walking’: How children and young people’s everyday pedestrian practices matter. Social & Cultural Geography, 15(1), 94–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hultman, K., & Lenz Taguchi, H. (2010). Challenging anthropocentric analysis of visual data: A relational materialist methodological approach to educational research. Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(5), 525–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Instone, L. (2004). Situating nature: On doing cultural geographies of Australian nature. Australian Geographer, 35(2), 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jackson, A. Y. (2003). Rhizovocality. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(5), 693–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Kraftl, P. (2013). Beyond ‘voice’, beyond ‘agency’, beyond ‘politics’? Hybrid childhoods and some critical reflections on children’s emotional geographies. Emotion, Space and Society, 9(1), 13–23Google Scholar
  28. Lather, P. (1993). Fertile obsession: Validity after poststructuralism. Sociological Quarterly, 34(4), 673–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lather, P., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2013). Post qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 629–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leander, K., & Boldt, G. (2012). Rereading a “pedagogy of multiliteracies”: Bodies, texts and emergence. Journal of Literacy Research, 45(1), 22–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee, N. (2008). Awake, asleep, adult, child: An a-humanist account of persons. Body and Society, 14(4), 57–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Loizos, M. (2009). Reading between the lines. IJCAI 2009, Proceedings of the 21st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Pasadena, California, USA, 11–17.Google Scholar
  33. Mackenzie, N., & Veresov, N. (2013). How drawing can support writing acquisition: Text construction in early writing from a Vygotskian perspective. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 38(4), 22–29.Google Scholar
  34. MacLure, M. (2006). The bone in the throat: Some uncertain thoughts on baroque method. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(6), 729–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Malin, H. (2013). Making meaningful: Intention in children’s art making. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 32(1), 6–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mannion, G. (2007). Going spatial, going relational: Why “listening to children” and children’s participation needs reframing. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 28(3), 405–420.Google Scholar
  37. Massumi, B. (1992). A user’s guide to capitalism and schizophrenia: Deviations from Deleuze and Guattari. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  38. Mayall, B. (2006). The sociology of childhood in relation to children’s rights. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 8, 243–259.Google Scholar
  39. Morss, J. R. (1996). Growing critical: Alternatives to developmental psychology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Pillow, W. S. (2003). Confessions, catharsis or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(2), 175–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pinto, G., Gamannossi, B. A., & Cameron, C. A. (2011). From scribbles to meanings: Social interaction in different cultures and the emergence of young children’s early drawing. Early Child Development & Care, 181(4), 425–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rautio, P. (2013). Children who carry stones in their pockets: On autotelic material practices in everyday life. Children’s Geographies, 11(4), 394–408.Google Scholar
  43. Rautio, P. (2014). Mingling and imitating in producing spaces for knowing and being: Insights from a Finnish study of child–matter intra-action. Childhood, 21(4), 461–474.Google Scholar
  44. Rautio, P., & Winston, J. (2015). Things and children in play: Improvisation with Language and Matter. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(1), 15–26.Google Scholar
  45. Ricoeur, P. (2004). The rule of metaphor. The creation of meaning in language. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  46. Ryan, S., & Goffin, S. G. (2008). Missing in action: Teaching in early care and education. Early Education and Development, 19(3), 385–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Soames, S. (2005). Philosophical analysis in the twentieth century, volume 2: The age of meaning. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Somerville, M., Davies, B., Power, K., Gannon, S., & de Carteret, P. (2011). Place pedagogy change. Rotterdam: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Spivak, G. C. (2005). Notes toward a tribute to Jaques Derrida. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 16(3), 102–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Spivak, G. C. (2013). An aesthetic education in the era of globalization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.Google Scholar
  51. St. Pierre, E. A. (1997). Nomadic inquiry in the smooth spaces of the field: A preface. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 10(3), 363–383.Google Scholar
  52. St. Pierre, E. A. (2008). Decentering voice in qualitative inquiry. International Review of Qualitative Research, 1(3), 319–336.Google Scholar
  53. Taylor, A. (2011). Reconceptualizing the ‘nature’ of childhood. Childhood, 18(4), 420–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Taylor, A., Pacini-Ketchabaw, V., & Blaise, M. (2013). Editorial. Researching naturecultures of postcolonial childhoods. Global Studies of Childhood, 3(4), 350–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vossoughi, S. (2009). A survival guide for the age of meaning. Rotman School of Management. Boston: MA.Google Scholar
  56. Whatmore, S. (2002). Hybrid geography: Natures, cultures, spaces. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  57. Winnicott, D. D. W. (1971). Playing and reality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Behavioural sciencesUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Faculty of EducationUniversity of OuluOuluFinland

Personalised recommendations