Advertisement

“Down the Toilet”: Spatial Politics and Young Children’s Participation

  • Zsuzsa Millei
  • Robert Imre
Living reference work entry

Later version available View entry history

Part of the Geographies of Children and Young People book series (GCYP, volume 7)

Abstract

Educational settings for children have a role in (re)producing their societies’ political cultures and to dynamically shape children’s subjectivities, including their political understandings, feelings, and orientations. In this chapter, a particular preschool in rural Australia is understood as a political space that (re)produces those relations that are part of the democratic society in which it is situated. Through the multiple “stories” told on the renovation of the preschool bathroom, the authors trace the political culture of the preschool by paying special attention to the politics of space. “Stories” were generated through interviews with various stakeholders after the refurbished bathroom was opened. The analysis illustrates the interview participants’ struggle over authority and the agendas and power relations they invest through the discursive constitution of the bathroom space. These struggles are indicative of the preschool’s and the broader political culture in which it is located. The preschool’s political culture ultimately led to the exclusion of many ideas young children put forward and considered important in regard to their bathroom. To conclude considerations are made about the ways in which these power relations condition the possibility of including children’s views and their participation and the importance of spatial politics for young children’s political learning.

Keywords

Children’s service Children’s space Hygienic discourses Intergenerationality Minor politics Participant discourses Political culture Political learning Spatial politics 

References

  1. Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1965). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  2. Ceppi, G., & Zini, M. (Eds.). (1998). Children, spaces, relations: Metaproject for an environment for young children. Milan: Domus Academy Research Center.Google Scholar
  3. Collins, D., & Coleman, T. (2008). Social geographies of education: Looking within, and beyond, school boundaries. Geography Compass, 2(1), 281–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. de Certeau, M. (1984) The practice of everyday life (trans: Rendall S.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Edwards, L. C. (2006). The creative arts: A process approach for teachers and children (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Merrill/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Elias, N. (1978). The civilizing process. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Ellsworth, E. (2005). Places of learning: Media, architecture, pedagogy. New York: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  8. Elwood, S., & Mitchell, K. (2012). ‘Mapping children’s politics: Spatial stories, dialogic relations and political formation’, Geografiska Annaler: Series B. Human Geography, 94(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
  9. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (trans: Sheridan, A.). London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  10. Foucault, M. (1980). Questions on geography. In G. Colin (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977 (pp. 63–77). New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  11. Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Foucault, M. (1984). Of other spaces, heterotopias. Architecture, Mouvement, Continuité 5, 46–49. http://foucault.info/documents/heterotopia/foucault.heterotopia.en.html. Accessed on 16 Apr 2014.
  13. Frow, J. (1991). Michel de Certeau and the practice of representation. Cultural Studies, 5(1), 52–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gallagher, M. (2006). Spaces of participation and inclusion? In E. Tisdall, M. Kay, et al. (Eds.), Children, young people and social inclusion (pp. 163–178). Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gallagher, M. (2008). ‘Power is not an evil’: Rethinking power in participatory methods. Children’s Geographies, 6(2), 137–150. doi:10.1080/14733280801963045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Holloway, S. L., & Valentine, G. (2000). Spatiality and the new social studies of childhood. Sociology, 34, 763–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hopkins, P. & Pain, R. (2007). Geographies of age: Thinking relationally. Area 39, 287–297.Google Scholar
  18. Horton, J., & Kraftl, P. (2008). Reflections on geographies of age: A response to Hopkins and Pain. Area, 40(2), 284–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. James, A., & James, A. L. (2004). Constructing childhood: Theory, policy and social practice. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. James, A., Jenks, C., & Prout, A. (1998). Theorizing childhood. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  21. Jennings, M. K., & Niemi, R. G. (1968). Patterns of political learning. Harvard Educational Review, 38(3), 443–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kallio, K. P. (2008). The body as a battlefield: Approaching children’s politics. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, 90(3), 285–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kallio, K. P., & Häkli, J. (2011). Tracing children’s politics. Political Geography, 30, 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kjørholt, A. T. (2007). Childhood as a symbolic space: Searching for authentic voices in the era of globalisation. Children's Geographies, 5(1–2), 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Létourneau, J. (2006). Remembering our past : An examination of young Quebecer’s historical memory. In R. Sandwell (Ed.), To the past: History education, public memory, & citizenship in Canada (pp. 70–87). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  26. Mannion, G. (2007). Going spatial, going Relational: Why “listening to children” and children’s participation needs reframing. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 28(3), 405–420. doi:10.1080/01596300701458970.Google Scholar
  27. Massey, D. (1999). ‘Imagining globalization: power-geometries of time-space’, in A. Brah, M. J. Hickman and M. Mac an Ghaill (eds), Global Futures: Migration, Environment and Globalization. Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp. 27–44.Google Scholar
  28. Millei, Z., & Cliff, K. (2014). The preschool bathroom: Making ‘problem bodies’ and the limit of the disciplinary regime over children. British Journal of Sociology of Education. doi:10.1080/01425692.2012.761394.Google Scholar
  29. Millei, Z., & Gallagher, J. (2012). Opening spaces for dialogue and re-envisioning children’s bathroom in a preschool: Practitioner research with children on a sensitive and neglected area of concern. International Journal of Early Childhood, 44(1), 9–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moss, P., & Petrie, P. (2002). From children’s services to children’s spaces. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  31. Percy-Smith, B. (2010). Councils, consultations and community: Rethinking the spaces for children and young people’s participation. Children’s Geographies, 8(2), 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pike, J. (2008). Foucault, space and primary school dining rooms. Children's Geographies, 6(4), 413–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pike, J. (2010). I don’t have to listen to you! You’re just a dinner lady!’: Power and resistance at lunchtimes in primary schools. Children's Geographies, 8(3), 275–287. doi:10.1080/14733285.2010.494867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pye, L. W. (1988). The mandarin and the cadre: China’s political cultures. Ann Arbor: Center for Chinese Studies, the University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  35. Rasmussen, K. (2004). Places for children – Children’s places. Childhood, 11(2), 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: reframing political thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Somerville, M., Power, K., & de Carteret, P. (2009). Introduction. Place studies for a global world. In M. Somerville, K. Power, & P. de Carteret (Eds.), Landscapes and learning: Place studies for a global world (pp. 3–20). Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  38. Strong-Wilson, T., & Ellis, J. (2007). Children and place: Reggio Emilia’s environment as third teacher. Theory Into Practice, 46(1), 40–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tingstad, V. (2006). Barndom under lupen:A° vokse opp i en foranderlig mediekultur, Oslo: Cappelen Akademisk forlag.Google Scholar
  40. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SPARGUniversity of Tampere, FinlandTampereFinland
  2. 2.Newcastle Business SchoolUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia

Personalised recommendations