Young Wheelchair Users Play and Recreation

Reference work entry
First Online:
Part of the Geographies of Children and Young People book series (GCYP, volume 9)

Abstract

Despite a rapid increase in research into children and young people’s lives, the experiences of disabled children – and in particular disabled young people – still remain largely overlooked. This chapter offers some reflections on the leisure experiences of young wheelchair users (13–17 years) in their homes and across a range of public spaces. The data that are presented were collected during a multi-method UK-based project which was designed to capture their use of different spaces away from the school environment. The teenagers and their parents discussed the physical and social barriers inherent in these places which impeded on their access to leisure. Their contributions signal the importance of situating the leisure experiences of young people in the context of families. The complex relationships and negotiations between parents and teenagers in accessing leisure are explored, signaling the ways that they work together, or at times in opposition, to open up or close down leisure opportunities.

Keywords

Young people Leisure Wheelchair Disability Home space Commercial spaces Outdoor 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aitchison, C. (2003). From leisure and disability to disability leisure: Developing data, definitions and discourses. Disability and Society, 18(7), 955–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beresford, B. (2003). The community equipment needs of disabled children and their families. York: Social Policy Research Unit.Google Scholar
  3. Beresford, B., & Rhodes, D. (2008). Housing and disabled children. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  4. Blunt, A., & Dowling, R. (2006). Home. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bromley, R. D. F., Matthews, D. L., & Thomas, C. J. (2007). City centre accessibility for wheelchair users: The consumer perspective and the planning implications. Cities, 24(3), 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burns, N., Watson, N., & Paterson, K. (2013). Risky bodies in risky spaces: Disabled people’s pursuit of outdoor leisure. Disability and Society, 28(8), 1059–1073. doi:10.1080/09687599.2012.749180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Childress, H. (2004). Teenagers, territory and the appropriation of space. Childhood, 11(2), 195–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Church, R. L., & Marston, J. R. (2003). Measuring accessibility for people with a disability. Geographical Analysis, 35(9), 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cloke, P., & Jones, O. (2005). ‘Unclaimed territory’: Childhood and disordered space(s). Social and Cultural Geography, 6(3), 311–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feinstein, L., Bynner, J., & Duckworth, K. (2006). Young people’s leisure contexts and their relation to adult outcomes. Journal of Youth Studies, 9(3), 305–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fjortoft, I. (2004). Landscape as playscape: The effects of natural environments on children’s play and motor development. Children Youth and Environments, 14(2), 21–44.Google Scholar
  12. Giddings, R., & Yarwood, R. (2005). Growing up, going out and growing out of the countryside: Childhood experiences in rural England. Children’s Geographies, 3(1), 101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gill, T. (2007). No fear: Growing up in a risk averse society. London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.Google Scholar
  14. Harker, C. (2005). Playing and affective time-spaces. Children’s Geographies, 3(1), 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heywood, F. (2004). The health outcomes of housing adaptations. Disability and Society, 19(2), 129–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hixson, E. (2013). Developing young people’s sense of self and place through sport. Annals of Leisure Research, 16(1), 3–15. doi:10.1080/11745398.2013.768156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hopkins, J. (2010). Young people, place & identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Imrie, R. (2000). Disabling environments and the geography of access policies and practices. Disability and Society, 15(1), 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Imrie, R. (2004). Disability, embodiment and the meaning of home. Housing Studies, 19(5), 745–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. John, A., & Wheway, R. (2004). Can play, will play: Disabled children and access to outdoor playgrounds. London: National Playing Fields Association.Google Scholar
  21. Jones, O. (2000). Melting geography: Purity, childhood, disorder and space. In S. Holloway & G. Valentine (Eds.), Children’s geographies: Playing, living, learning (pp. 29–47). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Kelly, D. (2005). Inclusive leisure opportunities for children and young people aged 8–16 with special educational needs and/or disability in South East England. Stoke On Trent: English Federation of Disability Sport.Google Scholar
  23. Kitchin, R. (1998). ‘Out of place’, ‘knowing one’s place’: Space, power and the exclusion of disabled people. Disability and Society, 13(3), 343–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Knight, A., Petrie, P., Zuurmond, M., & Potts, P. (2009). Mingling together: Promoting the social inclusion of disabled children and young people during the school holidays. Child and Family Social Work, 14, 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Knight, K. H., Porcellato, L., & Tume, L. (2014). Out-of-school lives of physically disabled children and young people in the United Kingdom: A qualitative literature review. Journal of Child Healthcare, 18(3), 275–285. doi:10.1177/1367493513490446.Google Scholar
  26. Lincoln, S. (2005). Feeling the noise: Teenagers, bedrooms and music. Leisure Studies, 24(4), 399–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lloyd, V., Gatherer, A., & Kalsy, S. (2006). Conducting qualitative interview research with people with expressive language difficulties. Qualitative Health Research, 16(10), 1386–1404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Matthews, H., Beale, L., Picton, P., & Briggs, D. (2003). Modelling access with GIS in urban systems (MAGUS): Capturing the experiences of wheelchair users. Area, 35(1), 34–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McNamee, S. (1998). Youth, gender and video games: Power and control in the home. In T. Skelton & G. Valentine (Eds.), Cool places: Geographies of youth cultures (pp. 195–206). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. McNamee, S. (1999). I won’t let her in my room’: Sibling strategies of power and resistance around computer and video games. In J. Seymour & P. Bagguley (Eds.), Relating intimacies: Power and resistance (pp. 246–260). Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Milner, J., & Madigan, R. (2004). Regulation and innovation: Rethinking ‘inclusive’ housing design. Housing Studies, 19(5), 727–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. O’Brien, M., Jones, D., Sloan, D., & Rustin, M. (2000). Children’s independent spatial mobility in the urban public realm. Childhood, 7(3), 257–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. O’Reilly, M., Ronzoni, P., & Dogra, N. (2013). Research with children: Theory and practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Osborne, P. (2005). Safe routes for children: What they want and what works. Children Youth and Environments, 15(1), 234–239.Google Scholar
  35. Pain, R. (2004). Children at risk? Children’s Geographies, 2(1), 65–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Park, D. C., Radford, J., & Vickers, M. H. (1998). Disability studies in human geography. Progress in Human Geography, 22(2), 208–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pollard, E. L., & Lee, P. D. (2003). Child well-being: A systematic review of the literature. Social Indicators Research, 61(1), 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Powell, S., & Wellard, I. (2008). Policies and play: The impact of national policies on children’s opportunities for play. London: Play England.Google Scholar
  39. Purrington, A., & Hickerson, B. (2013). Leisure as a cross-cultural concept. World Leisure Journal, 55(2), 125–137. doi:10.1080/04419057.2013.782564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pyer, M., & Campbell, J. (2013). The ‘other participant’ in the room: The effect of significant adults in research with children. Research Ethics, 9(4), 153–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pyer, M., & Tucker, F. (2014). “With us, we, like, physically can’t”: Transport, mobility and the leisure experiences of teenage wheelchair users. Mobilities. doi:10.1080/17450101.2014.970390. Online first.Google Scholar
  42. Shikako-Thomas, K., Kolehmainen, N., Ketelaar, M., Bult, M., & Law, M. (2014). Promoting leisure participation as part of health and wellbeing in children and youth with Cerebral Palsy. Journal of Child Neurology, 1–9. doi:10.1177/0883073814533422.Google Scholar
  43. Statham, J., & Chase, E. (2010). Childhood wellbeing: A brief overview. Briefing Paper 1. Childhood Wellbeing Research Centre, University Of Kent.Google Scholar
  44. Valentine, G. (1999). ‘Oh please, Mum. Oh please, Dad’: Negotiating children’s spatial boundaries. In L. Mckie, S. Bowlby, & S. Gregory (Eds.), Gender, power and the household (pp. 137–154). Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Valentine, G. (2004). Public space and the culture of childhood. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  46. Valentine, G., & Mckendrick, J. (1997). Children’s outdoor play: Exploring parental concerns about children’s safety and the changing nature of childhood. Geoforum, 28(2), 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Welch, V., Collins, V., Hatton, C., Emerson, E., Robertson, J., & Wells, E. (2013). Short break and respite services for disabled children in England: Comparing children’s and parents’ perspectives of their impact on children. Children and Society. doi:10.1111/Chso.12001. In press.Google Scholar
  48. Wray-Lake, L., Crouter, A. C., & McHale, S. M. (2010). Developmental patterns in decision-making autonomy across middle childhood and adolescence: European American parents’ perspectives. Child Development, 81(2), 636–651. doi:10.1111/J.1467-8624.2009.01420.X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Young, L., & Barrett, H. (2001). Adapting visual methods: Action research with Kampala street children. Area, 33(2), 141–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Health and WellbeingThe University of NorthamptonNorthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations