Ways of Thinking About Young People in Participatory Interview Research

Living reference work entry
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

This chapter explores what it means to treat young people and children as being worthy of study in their own right, and not in terms of their relationship with adulthood. Moving from the adult-centric theories that have traditionally dominated childhood and youth research, this chapter highlights engaging with young people as active agents in research. Focusing on issues that are particularly relevant to young people (sexuality, HIV/AIDS ), the chapter draws on participatory interviews to illustrate the inversion of power relations that enables researchers to engage with and learn from young people who are positioned as figures of authority. It is argued that an analysis of how research with children and young people can be democratized enables an understanding of the pedagogic implications of participatory research . Thinking about interviews as a social encounter between participants, rather than as a device to elicit information from young people opens up an understanding of the way in which interviews are spaces in which the discursive practices of the young person are displayed. Respecting these practices enables researchers to draw on young people’s knowledge about issues such as HIV/AIDS, for example. The chapter concludes by elaborating on the pedagogical opportunities and risks of using participatory research to open up performance spaces for young people.

Keywords

Young People Group Interview Individual Interview Participatory Interview Discursive Practice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bhana, D. (2007). The price of innocence: Teachers, gender, childhood sexuality, HIV and AIDS in early schooling. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 11(4), 431–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhana, D., & Pattman, R. (2011). Girls want money, boys want virgins: The materiality of love amongst South African township youth in the context of HIV and AIDS. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 13(8), 961–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biddulph, S. (2000). Raising boys. London: Harper-Collins.Google Scholar
  4. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Davies, B. (2003). Frogs and snails and feminist tails. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  7. Durkheim, E. (1982). What is a social fact? In The rules of sociological method (pp. 50–53). London: MacMillan Press.Google Scholar
  8. Epstein, D., & Johnson, R. (1998). Schooling sexualities. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Foucault, M. (1979). The history of sexuality: Vol. 1, An introduction. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  10. Frosh, S., Phoenix, A., & Pattman, R. (2002). Young masculinities. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  11. Gilbert, R., & Gilbert, P. (1998). Masculinity goes to school. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  13. Hammersley, M. (2013). Researching children’s lives offline and online. In S. Bragg & M. Kehily (Eds.), Children and young people’s cultural worlds (pp. 269–302). Milton Keynes: Open University.Google Scholar
  14. HEAIDS Report. (2010). The role of educators in mitigating the impact of the HIV/AIDS pandemic on the education system in South Africa. Johannesburg: Higher Education HIV/AIDS Programme.Google Scholar
  15. Helitzer-Allen, D., Makhambera, M., & Wangel, A. (1994). Obtaining sensitive information: The need for more than focus groups. Reproductive Health Matters, 3, 161–168.Google Scholar
  16. Hollway, W., & Jefferson, T. (2004). Doing qualitative research differently. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. James, A., & James, A. (2012). Key concepts in childhood studies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. James, A., & Prout, A. (1997). Constructing and reconstructing childhood. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  19. Jewkes, R., & Morrell, R. (2011). Sexuality and the limits of agency among South African teenage women: Theorising femininities and their connections to HIV risk practices. Social Science Medicine, 74(11), 1729–1737.Google Scholar
  20. Kehily, M. J. (2002). Sexuality, gender and schooling, shifting agendas in social learning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Kehily, M., & Nayak, A. (1996). The Christmas kiss: sexuality, story-telling and schooling. Curriculum Studies, 4(2), 211–227.Google Scholar
  22. Kenway, J., Willis, S., Blackmore, J., & Rennie, L. (1998). Answering back: Girls, boys and feminism in schools. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. MacNaughton, G. (2000). Rethinking gender in early childhood. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. Mitchell, C., Walsh, S., & Moletsane, R. (2006). ‘Speaking for ourselves’: A case for visual arts based and other participatory methodologies in working with young people to address sexual violence. In F. Leach & C. Mitcelle (Eds.), Combating gender violence in and around schools (pp. 103–111). London: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
  25. Msibi, T. (2012). I’m used to it now: Experiences of homophobia among queer youth in South African township schools. Gender and Education, 24(5), 515–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. In H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing feminist research (pp. 58–72). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  27. Parsons, T. (2002). Family, socialisation and interaction. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Pattman, R. (2005). Boys and girls should not get too close: Sexuality, the identities of African boys and girls and HIV/AIDS education. Sexuality, Special Anniversary Edition on Pleasure and Danger, 8(4), 501–520.Google Scholar
  29. Pattman, R. (2007). Researching boys and young men in Southern Africa in the context of HIV/AIDS – a radical approach. In K. Ratele & T. Shefer (Eds.), From boys to men: Social constructions of masculinity in contemporary society (pp. 33–49). Cape Town: UCT Press.Google Scholar
  30. Pattman, R. (2013). Learning from the learners about sexuality in a participatory interview in a South African school. In D. Francis (Ed.), Sexuality, society and pedagogy (pp. 121–133). Stellenbosch: Sun Press.Google Scholar
  31. Pattman, R., & Chege, F. (2003). Finding our voices: Gendered and sexual identities and HIV/AIDS in education. Nairobi: UNICEF.Google Scholar
  32. Pattman, R., & Kehily, M. (2004). ‘Gender’ in doing research with children and young people. In Fraser, S. et al. (Eds.) London: Sage in association with Open University.Google Scholar
  33. Prendergast, S., & Forrest, S. (1997). Hieroglyphs of the heterosexual: Learning about gender in school. In L. Segal (Ed.), New sexual agendas. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  34. Raey, D. (1990). Working with boys. Gender and Education, 2(3), 269–282.Google Scholar
  35. Reynold, E. (2004). Girls, boys, and junior sexualities: Exploring children’s gender and sexual relations in the primary school. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Riessman, C. (1993). Narrative analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Salisbury, J., & Jackson, D. (1996). Challenging macho values. Bristol: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  38. Scott, J. (1992). Experience. In J. Butler & J. Scott (Eds.), Feminist theorize the political. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Shefer, T., & Foster, D. (2009). Heterosex among young South Africans: Research reflections. In M. Steyn & M. Van Zyl (Eds.), The prize and the price: Shaping sexualities in South Africa (pp. 267–289). Cape Town: HSRC Press.Google Scholar
  40. Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (1983). Breaking out: Feminist consciousness and feminist research. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  41. Stuart, J., & Smith, A. (2011). Reading across and back: thoughts on working with (Re-visited) drawing collections. In L. Theron, C. Mitchell, & A. Smith (Eds.), Picturing research: Drawing as visual methodology. Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  42. Thomson, R. (2007). In M. Kehily (Ed.), Belonging, in understanding youth: Perspectives, identities and practices. Milton Keynes: OUP.Google Scholar
  43. Thorne, B. (1993). Gender play: Girls and boys in school. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Wong, D. (1961). The over-socialised conception of man in modern society. American Sociological Review, 26, 183–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wood, K., Lambert, H., & Jewkes, R. (2007). ‘Showing roughness in a beautiful way’: Talk about love, coercion and rape in South African youth culture. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 21(3), 277–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Social AnthropologyUniversity of StellenboschStellenboschSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations