Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory

2017 Edition
| Editors: Michael A. Peters

Hegel on Moral Development, Education, and Ethical Life

  • Kari Väyrynen
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-588-4_423

Synonyms

Introduction

Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770–1831) was an important educational thinker. He was, besides Kant, the most eminent philosopher of German idealism. His first great work, Phenomenology of Spirit (1807) was of revolutionary significance. He developed in his Science of Logic (1816) a dialectical system of categories, which was, for example, important for Marxist philosophy. His later philosophical system was summarized in Encyclopedia (1818), which he began to write in Heidelberg. Later in Berlin, his philosophy became internationally famous. He died of cholera in 1831 (on Hegel’s biography see Pinkard 2000; general introduction to his thinking Beiser 1993; Hösle 1987).

Hegel was especially influential for continental philosophy – Marxism, hermeneutics, postmodernism – and also affected American pragmatism, for example, John Dewey. Hegel as a pedagogical thinker is not so...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Beiser, F. C. (1993). The Cambridge companion to Hegel. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Hegel, G. W. F. (1909). Second school address. In M. Mackenzie (Ed.), Hegel’s educational theory and practice. London: Swan Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
  3. Hegel, G. W. F. (1971). The philosophy of right (trans: Knox, T. M.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Hegel, G. W. F. (1979). The phenomenology of spirit. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Hegel, G. W. F. (1986). The Philosophical Propaedeutik (trans: Miller, A. V.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  6. Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Honneth, A. (2010). The pathologies of individual freedom: Hegel’s social theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hösle, V. (1987). Hegels System: Der Idealismus der Subjektivität und das Problem der Intersubjektivität (pp. 1–2). Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
  9. Ikäheimo, H., & Laitinen, A. (Eds.). (2011). Recognition and social ontology. Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
  10. Kant, I. (1978). Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
  11. Pinkard, T. (1988). Hegel’s dialectic. The explanation of possibility. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Pinkard, T. (2000). Hegel: A biography. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Rousseau, J. J. (1762). Du contrat social; ou, principes du droit politique. Amsterdam: Marc Michel Rey.Google Scholar
  14. Väyrynen, K. (1992). Der Prozess der Bildung und Erziehung im finnischen Hegelianismus. Helsinki: Societas Historica Finlandiae.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of OuluOuluFinland