Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory

2017 Edition
| Editors: Michael A. Peters

Heidegger on Teaching

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-588-4_137
  • 121 Downloads

Synonyms

Phenomenology; Teaching

Central to the contributions Heidegger makes to education are his pronouncements on teaching. These statements are not numerous, but where they appear they are significant because they situate teaching within Heidegger’s broader philosophy. In addition they offer a concrete way to comprehend how this philosophy may be applied – as Heidegger applied it – in terms of the encounters between teacher and student(s), by way of Da-sein.

Perhaps the most famous of Heidegger’s statements on teaching occurs in his 1951–1952 lecture series Was Heisst Denken? [What is called thinking?], the first lecture course he delivered on his return to teaching following his postwar suspension. I include the major section of this proclamation on teaching here, while acknowledging that more of relevance was said in the flow of this first lecture in the course:

Teaching is even more difficult than learning. We know that; but we rarely think about it. And why is teaching more...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Heidegger, M. (1967). What is a thing? (trans: Barton, W. B., Jr. & Deutsch, V.). South Bend: Gateway Editions.Google Scholar
  2. Heidegger, M. (1968). What is called thinking? (trans: Gray, J. G.). New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  3. Heidegger, M. (1998). On the essence of truth. In W. McNeill (Ed.), Pathmarks (rev. edn) (T. Sheehan & W. McNeill, Trans.) (pp. 136–154). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Heidegger, M. (1985). History of the concept of time: Prolegomena (T. Kisiel, Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Heidegger, M. (2001). In M. Boss (Ed.), Zollikon seminars: Protocols – Conversations – Letters (trans: Mayr, F. & Askay, R.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Heidegger, M. (2003). Seminar in Zähringen 1973. In Four seminars (A. Mitchell & F. Raffoul, Trans.) (pp. 64–81). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Heidegger, M. (2010). Being and time (rev. trans.) (trans: Stambaugh, J.). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  8. Heidegger, M. (2013). The event (R. Rojcewicz, Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Quay, J. (2015). Learning phenomenology with Heidegger: Experiencing the phenomenological ‘starting point’ as the beginning of phenomenological research. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48(5), 484–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. von Herrmann, F.-W. (2011). Dasein and Da-sein in being and time and contributions to philosophy (From Enowning) (B. Radloff, Trans.). In F. Schalow (Ed.), Heidegger, translation, and the task of thinking: Essays in honor of Parvis Emad. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Melbourne Graduate School of EducationThe University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia