Skip to main content

Mimesis Theory, Learning, and Polysemiotic Communication

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory

Synonyms

Multimodal signification; Representational imitation; Resemblance-based representation

Introduction

Discussions on what makes human cognition and learning unique in the animal world often focus on language. But language could not have evolved in our species, and cannot be learned by children or adults without a more fundamental cognitive-semiotic capacity: mimesis. This thesis was first suggested by the ancient Greeks and was forcibly elaborated by Donald (2013), within a general theory of human cognitive evolution with considerable support in the literature (Nelson 1998; Zlatev 2008). This theory claims that mimesis constitutes a key adaptation in our hominine ancestors that greatly facilitated the rehearsal of complex skills and the ability to imitate and learn culture-specific behaviors from others. It allowed the creation of bodily representations that could themselves be imitated, leading to a shared representational culture, prior to the subsequent evolution of a...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aristotle. (1987). The poetics of Aristotle. Translation and Commentary S. Halliwell. Chapel Hill: The University of North Caroline Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald, M. (2013). Mimesis theory re-examined, twenty years after the fact. In G. Hatfield & H. Pittman (Eds.), Evolution of mind, brain and culture (pp. 169–192). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, J. (2014). Drawn from the ground: Sound, sign and inscription in Central Australian sand stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K. (1998). Language in cognitive development: The emergence of the mediated mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dreams, and imitation in childhood. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonesson, G. (2010). From mimicry to mime by way of mimesis: Reflections on a general theory of iconicity. Sign Systems Studies, 38(1/4), 18–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sörbom, G. (2002). The classical concept of mimesis. In P. Smith & C. Wilde (Eds.), A companion to art theory (pp. 19–28). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vigliocco, G., Perniss, P., & Vinson, D. (2014). Language as a multimodal phenomenon: Implications for language learning, processing and evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369(1651), 20130292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zlatev, J. (2008). From proto-mimesis to language: Evidence from primatology and social neuroscience. Journal of Physiology – Paris, 102, 137–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jordan Zlatev .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Zlatev, J. (2019). Mimesis Theory, Learning, and Polysemiotic Communication. In: Peters, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_672-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_672-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-287-532-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-532-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics