Skip to main content

Philosophy and Transactional Perspective in Learning Sciences

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory
  • 55 Accesses

Introduction

Transaction is an important notion in the learning sciences because it extends and improves upon important insights from the literature on the situated and distributed nature of cognition to also include a temporal dimension (Roth and Jornet 2013). When investigating the learning in some classroom, researchers drawing on the transactional approach no longer assume that students do what the curriculum design intended them to do. Instead, they look at behaviors and performances arising in the situation and identify those features of the environment that students actually take up in their actions and talk. Teachers intending to solicit the same or similar behaviors (practices) from different students or student groups provide different materials allowing students to select those that most speak to them and with which they can enter in correspondence. Teachers also come to understand that they never are or can be in the control over the lived (enacted) curriculum, however...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York: E. P. Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corno, L., Cronbach, L. J., Kupermintz, H., Lohman, D. F., Mandinach, E. B., Porteus, A. W., Talbert, J. E., & for the Stanford Aptitude Seminar. (2002). Remaking the concept of aptitude: Extending the legacy of Richard E. Snow. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1929). Experience and nature. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1997). Experience and education. New York: Touchstone (First published in 1938).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. F. (1999). Knowing and the known. In R. Handy & E. E. Hardwood (Eds.), Useful procedures of inquiry (pp. 97–209). Great Barrington: Behavioral Research Council (First published in 1949).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jornet, A., Roth, W.-M., & Krange, I. (2016). A transactional approach to transfer episodes. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25, 285–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1932). Philosophy of the present. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. (1967). The will to power. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M., & Jornet, A. G. (2013). Situated cognition. WIREs Cognitive Science, 4, 463–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, R. E. (1992). Aptitude theory: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Educational Psychologist, 27, 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolff-Michael Roth .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Roth, WM. (2019). Philosophy and Transactional Perspective in Learning Sciences. In: Peters, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_666-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_666-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-287-532-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-532-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics