Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory

Living Edition
| Editors: Michael A. Peters

Critical Education and Digital Cultures

  • Jeremy KnoxEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_124-1


With the increasing uptake of digital technologies in many facets of education, perspectives from the study of technology and culture have proved to be rich and productive ways of understanding the qualities and trajectories of this emerging area. Nevertheless, such cultural concerns remain largely on the fringes of educational practice and research, which has tended to focus exclusively on the idea of a developing human subject (Usher and Edwards 1994). This grounding in humanism has tended to overlook the influence of culture and technology on education, privileging instead orthodox ideas such as universalism (that all humans are essentially the same), autonomy (that we are capable of independent thought and action), and rational progress (that reasoned thinking, as the goal of education, drives human development). This deep-seated relationship to humanism has structured the contemporary project of education around the idea of largely uniform individuals, who are...


Virtual World Community Culture Digital Learn Plagiarism Detection Algorithmic Culture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Bayne, S. (2004a). Smoothness and striation in digital learning spaces. E-Learning, 1(2), 302–316. 15 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bayne, S. (2004b). “Mere Jelly”: The bodies of networked learners. In S. Banks, P. Goodyear, V. Hodgson, C. Jones, V. Lally, D. McConnell, & C. Steeples (Eds.), Networked learning 2004: Proceedings of the 4th international conference held at the University of Lancaster, 5–7 Apr 2004.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, D. and Kennedy, B. (Eds)., (2000). The Cybercultures Reader. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Dahlberg, L. (2004). Internet research tracings: Towards non-reductionist methodology. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 9(3). http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2004.tb00289.x/full
  5. Gibson, W. (1984). Neuromancer. London: Voyager.Google Scholar
  6. Haraway, D. (1991) A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century. In Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (New York; Routledge), pp. 149–181.Google Scholar
  7. Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Rheingold, H. (2000). The virtual community. London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Usher, R., & Edwards, R. (1994). Postmodernism and education: Different voices, different worlds. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of EdinburghEdinburghScotland, UK