Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory

Living Edition
| Editors: Michael A. Peters

Critical Pedagogy and Digital Technology: Postmodernist and Marxist Perspectives

  • Katarina Vuković PeovićEmail author
  • Petar Jandrić
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_121-1


Human learning cannot be thought of without technologies. Yet, while the movement of critical pedagogy has always been interested in educational usage of mass media, in the second part of the twentieth century “there has arguably been less interest in the fourth major platform of the Freirean program – economic development through technological modernization processes” (Kahn and Kellner 2007: 434). At the brink of the new millennium, human society has rapidly become saturated with information and communication technologies. In order to make sense of education in the age of emerging digital cultures, mainstream critical pedagogy has employed two major philosophical traditions: postmodernism and Marxism. Marxism is a social theory that emerges from the late nineteenth century and the works of Karl Marx. (There is also a term “Marxian theory” which stresses the fact that emerged studies follow the work of Karl Marx but not necessarily follow Marx’s teachings in full.)...


Digital Technology Critical Pedagogy Surplus Labor Social Revolution Class Politics 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Aaronowitz, S. & Giroux, H. (1991). Postmodern education: Politics, culture and social criticism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barbrook, R. (1999). Cyber-communism: How the Americans are superseding capitalism in cyberspace. Science as Culture, 9(1), 5–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell, D. (1973/1999). The coming of post-industrial society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  4. Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism or the cultural logic of late capitalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  6. Kahn, R., & Kellner, D. (2007). Paulo Freire and Ivan Illich: Technology, politics and the reconstruction of education. Policy Futures in Education, 5(4), 431–448.Google Scholar
  7. Lăzăroiu, G. (Ed.). (2014). Liber amicorum: A philosophical conversation among friends. New York: Addleton Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Marx, K. (1904). A contribution to the critique of political economy. Chicago: Charles H. Kerr.Google Scholar
  9. Marx, K. (1976). Capital. A critique of political economy (Vol. 1). Middlesex: Penguin.Google Scholar
  10. Marx, K. (1993). Grundrisse. Foundations of the critique of political economy (rough draft). London: Penguin Books & New Left Review.Google Scholar
  11. McLaren, P. (1995). Critical pedagogy and predatory culture: Oppositional politics in a postmodern era. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. McLaren, P., & Jandrić, P. (2014). Critical revolutionary pedagogy is made by walking – In a world where many worlds coexist. Policy Futures in Education, 12(6), 805–831.Google Scholar
  13. Touraine, A. (1971). The post-industrial society. Tomorrow’s social history: Classes, conflicts and culture in the programmed society. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  14. Wark, M. (2004). A hacker manifesto. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of RijekaRijekaCroatia
  2. 2.Department of Informatics and ComputingUniversity of Applied SciencesZagrebCroatia