Advertisement

Plagiarism, Misrepresentation, and Exploitation by Established Professionals: Power and Tactics

  • Brian Martin
Reference work entry

Abstract

Many academics and other professionals are implicated in plagiarism, misrepresentation, and exploitation, yet research about this is limited compared to the large body of research on student cheating. In what can be called competitive plagiarism, academics, judges, politicians, journalists, and others use the words and ideas of others without adequate acknowledgment. Misrepresentation occurs when professionals inflate or manufacture their credentials and achievements in curricula vitae, job applications, and media releases. Intellectual exploitation involves taking credit for the work of others in a routine fashion. Examples include ghostwriting and managers taking credit for the writings and ideas of subordinates. This sort of exploitation fits the normal definitions of plagiarism but this label is seldom applied; it can be called institutionalized plagiarism.

Understanding the persistence of intellectual exploitation can be understood by examining the tactics commonly used by plagiarizers to reduce outrage over their actions. These include cover-up, devaluation, reinterpretation, official channels, intimidation, and rewards. Powerful plagiarizers have access to most or all of these techniques, whereas student plagiarizers usually can use only cover-up and reinterpretation. The existence of institutionalized plagiarism depends on a lack of questioning of exploitative systems.

Keywords

Senior Academic False Allegation Formal Complaint Senior Scholar Junior Colleague 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I thank Tracey Bretag and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on a draft of this chapter. Many individuals have aided my understanding of the issues over the years, especially those who have told me their personal stories involving plagiarism and exploitation.

References

  1. Angell, M. (2005). The truth about the drug companies: How they deceive us and what to do about it. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  2. Attewell, P., & Domina, T. (2011). Educational imposters and fake degrees. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 29, 57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bedeian, A. G. (1996a). Improving the journal review process: The question of ghostwriting. American Psychologist, 51(11), 1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bedeian, A. G. (1996b). Thoughts on the making and remaking of the management discipline. Journal of Management Inquiry, 5(4), 311–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowers, N. (1997). Words for the taking: The hunt for a plagiarist. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, G. M. (2006). Degrees of doubt: Legitimate, real and fake qualifications in a global market. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 28(1), 71–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coser, L., Kadushin, C., & Powell, W. W. (1982). Books: The culture and commerce of publishing. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  8. Fowlkes, M. R. (1980). Behind every successful man: Wives of medicine and academe. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Fuegi, J. (1994). The life and lies of Bertolt Brecht. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  10. Goldacre, B. (2012). Bad pharma: How drug companies mislead doctors and harm patients. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
  11. Lewis, D. L. (2014). Science for sale. New York: Skyhorse.Google Scholar
  12. Logdberg, L. (2011). Being the ghost in the machine: A medical ghostwriter’s personal view. PLoS Medicine, 8(8), e1001071. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mallon, T. (1989). Stolen words: Forays into the origins and ravages of plagiarism. New York: Ticknor and Fields.Google Scholar
  14. Martin, B. (1992). Scientific fraud and the power structure of science. Prometheus, 10(1), 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Martin, B. (1994). Plagiarism: A misplaced emphasis. Journal of Information Ethics, 3(2), 36–47.Google Scholar
  16. Martin, B. (2007). Justice ignited: The dynamics of backfire. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  17. Martin, B. (2008). Plagiarism struggles. Plagiary: Cross-Disciplinary Studies in Plagiarism, Fabrication, and Falsification, 3. http://www.bmartin.cc/pubs/08plagiary.html
  18. Martin, B. (2013). Countering supervisor exploitation. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 45(1), 74–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McCrostie, J. (2009). Ghost-written textbooks. The Language Teacher, 33(12), 3–6.Google Scholar
  20. Moodie, G. (2006). Bureaucratic plagiarism. Plagiary: Cross-Disciplinary Studies in Plagiarism, Fabrication, and Falsification, 1, 66–69.Google Scholar
  21. Morgan, R. (1977). Going too far: The personal chronicle of a feminist. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  22. Papanek, H. (1973). Men, women, and work: Reflections on the two-person career. American Journal of Sociology, 78(4), 852–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Parenti, M. (1978). Power and the powerless. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  24. Pollak, R. (1996). The creation of Dr. B: A biography of Bruno Bettelheim. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  25. Richmond, D. R. (2014). Unoriginal sin: The problem of judicial plagiarism. Arizona State Law Journal, 45, 1077–1105.Google Scholar
  26. Russell, J. H. (2007, November/December). A million little writers. 02138 Magazine, 78.Google Scholar
  27. Schlesinger, R. (2008). White house ghosts: Presidents and their speechwriters. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  28. Shaw, E. (1991). Ghostwriting: How to get into the business. New York: Paragon House.Google Scholar
  29. Sismondo, S. (2009). Ghosts in the machine: Publication planning in the medical sciences. Social Studies of Science, 39(2), 171–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sousa-Silva, R. (2014). Detecting translingual plagiarism and the backlash against translation plagiarists. Language and Law, 1(1), 70–94.Google Scholar
  31. Spender, D. (1989). The writing or the sex? Or why you don’t have to read women’s writing to know it’s no good. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  32. Thompson, C. (1998). You’ve always been a plagiarist. Journal of Information Ethics, 7(1), 49–53.Google Scholar
  33. Trivers, R. (2011). The folly of fools: The logic of deceit and self-deception in human life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  34. Weber-Wulff, D. (2014). False feathers: A perspective on academic plagiarism. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Witton, R. (1973). Academics and student supervision: Apprenticeship or exploitation? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 9(3), 71–73.Google Scholar
  36. X, M., with the assistance of Haley, A. (1965). The autobiography of Malcolm X. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Humanities and Social InquiryUniversity of WollongongWollongongAustralia

Personalised recommendations