Skip to main content

Oporto Centenarian Study

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Geropsychology

Definition

This entry presents the first population-based study conducted in Portugal, the Oporto Centenarian Study (PT100). It starts by providing an overview of the centenarian population in Portugal and then describes PT100’s methodological approach (sampling, procedures, and measures) and synthesizes its main findings on three core dimensions considered to be determinants of quality of life in extreme old age (Serra et al. 2011): cognitive and physical functioning, social resources (social relationships and social activities), and personal attitude toward life (valuation of life). An outlook of current satellite projects of the PT100 is presented at the end.

Centenarians in Portugal

The phenomenon of longevity has been one of the most relevant achievements of the last century. A rapid increase in the size of the older population has been observed in Portugal, with the oldest old (individuals aged 80 and plus) representing 5.6 % of the total population and 26.5 % of the older...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Araújo, L., Ribeiro, O., Teixeira, L., Azevedo, M. J., Jopp, D., & Paul, C. (2015). Measuring well-being in old age: Positive valuation of life scale for Portuguese older adults. Quality of Life Research, 24, 2385–2389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araújo, L., Ribeiro, O., Teixeira, L. & Paúl, C. (2016). Successful aging at 100: The relevance of subjectivity and psychological resources. International Psychogeriatrics, 28(2), 179–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, G., & Pachana, N. (2011). Development and validation of a short form of the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory – the GAI-SF. International Psychogeriatrics, 23(1), 125–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosco, T., Armstrong, J., Stephan, B., & Brayne, C. (2015). Successful aging and frailty: Mutually exclusive paradigms or two ends of a shared continuum? Canadian Geriatrics Journal, 18, 35–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duarte, N., Teixeira, L., Ribeiro, O., & Paúl, C. (2014). Frailty phenotype criteria in centenarians: Findings from the Oporto Centenarian Study. European Geriatric Medicine, 5, 371–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fillenbaum, G., & Smyer, M. (1981). The development, validity, and reliability of the OARS multidimensional functional assessment questionnaire. Journal of Gerontology, 36, 428–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-mental state. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, P., & Debats, D. (2010). Sources of human life-strengths, resilience and health. In P. Fry & C. Keyes (Eds.), New frontiers in resilient aging: Life strengths and well-being in late life (pp. 15–59). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gondo, Y., Hirose, N., Arai, Y., Inagaki, H., Masui, Y., Yamamura, K., …, Kitagawa, K. (2006). Functional status of centenarians in Tokyo, Japan: Developing better phenotypes of exceptional longevity. Gerontology, 61, 305–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • INE – National Institute of Estatistics. (2001). Resident population by local, gender and age group. Available at: http://www.ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpid=INE&xpgid=ine_indicadores&indOcorrCod=0002192 &contexto = bd&selTab = tab2.

  • INE – National Institute of Estatistics. (2011). Resident population by local, gender and age group. Available at: http://www.ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpid=INE&xpgid=ine_indicadores&indOcorrCod=0006368 &contexto = bd&selTab = tab2.

  • Jopp, D., & Rott, C. (2006). Adaptation in very old age: Exploring the role of re- sources, beliefs, and attitudes for centenarians’ happiness. Psychology and Aging, 21, 266–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, M. P., Moss, M., Hoffman, C., Kleban, M., Ruckdeschel, K., & Winter, L. (2001). Valuation of life: A concept and a scale. Aging & Mental Health, 13, 3–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubben, J., Blozik, E., Gilmann, G., Iliffe, S., Kruse, W. V., Beck, J. C., & Stuck, A. E. (2006). Performance of an abbreviated version of the Lubben Social Network Scale among three European community-dwelling older adult populations. Gerontologist, 46, 503–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poon, L., & Cheung, S. (2012). Centenarian research in the past two decades. Asian Journal of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 7, 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisberg, B., Ferris, S. H., de Leon, M. J., & Crook, T. (1982). The global deterioration scale for assessment of primary degenerative dementia. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 139, 1136–1139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro, O., & Araújo, L. (2012). Centenários: deafios da longevidade [Centenarians and the challenges of longevity]. Kairós, 15, 57–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serra, V., Watson, J., Sinclair, D., & Kneale, D. (2011). Living beyond 100: A report on centenarians. London: International Longevity Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yesavage, J., Brink, T., Rose, T., Lum, O., Huang, V., Adey, M., Leirer, V. (1983). Development and validation of a geriatric depression rating scale: A preliminary report. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 17, 34-49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oscar Ribeiro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this entry

Cite this entry

Ribeiro, O., Araújo, L., Teixeira, L., Brandão, D., Duarte, N., Paúl, C. (2015). Oporto Centenarian Study. In: Pachana, N. (eds) Encyclopedia of Geropsychology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-080-3_141-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-080-3_141-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-080-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics