Abstract
The ending of the Cold War ushered in an era of conventional arms control measures that were previously stymied by great power competition. Further, by the end of the 1990s, a civil society coalition working with middle power states had changed the way international law was made, and had achieved an outright ban not only on a conventional weapon but a weapon in popular use by ground forces and stockpiled by most countries in the world – the antipersonnel landmine. A decade later, a similar ban on cluster munitions was achieved by a related coalition. The popularity of these bans, for ostensibly humanitarian reasons, and in what came to be termed “humanitarian arms control” led to normative changes in State behavior, and changes to customary international law. Additionally, civil society groups found ways to bring other users of these weapons, armed non-state actors, to be accountable under international law. That challenged the long-held notions not only that the State holds the monopoly on the threat or use of force but also who or what can be held accountable to international norms and laws. Further, human rights, particularly the rights of survivors of landmine and cluster munition explosions, became central to the provisions in these treaties.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Abramson J (2020) U.S. to allow expanded landmine use. Arms Control Association. March. https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2020-03/news/us-allow-expanded-landmine-use. Accessed 27 Jun
Aedy R (2012) Interview with John Rodsted. Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) Radio. 18 November. https://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/archived/sundayprofile/john-rodsted2c-photographer/4376418. Accessed 4 July 2019
Axworthy L (2004) Forward. In: Matthew RA, McDonald B, Rutherford K (eds) Landmines and human security: international politics and war’s hidden legacy. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, pp xv–xvii
Bailey S (2012) Victim assistance and disability rights: beyond the rhetoric. J ERW Mine Action 16(3):28–31
Bellal A, Casey-Maslen S (2011) Rules of engagement: protecting civilians through dialogue with armed non-state actors. Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights, Geneva, October
Bolton M, Nash T, Moyes R (2012) Ban autonomous armed robots. Article 36. March. http://www.article36.org/statements/ban-autonomous-armed-robots/. Accessed 26 Jun
Bongard P, Somer J (2011) Monitoring armed non-state actor compliance with humanitarian norms: a look at international mechanisms and the Geneva Call Deed of Commitment. Int Rev Red Cross 883. September
Campaign to Stop Killer Robots website (2020). https://www.stopkillerrobots.org/about/. Accessed 27 Jun
Clapham A (2014) Weapons and armed non-state actors. In: Casey-Maslen S (ed) Weapons under international human rights law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 163–196
Cluster Munition Monitor (2019) ICBL-CMC, Geneva, August
Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons. Amended Protocol II (1996). https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXVI-2-b&chapter=26&clang=_en. Accessed 27 Jun
Convention on Cluster Munitions (2008). https://www.clusterconvention.org/the-convention/convention-text/. Accessed 27 Jun
Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production, and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and On Their Destruction (1997). https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=IND&mtdsg_no=XXVI-5&chapter=26&clang=_en. Accessed 27 Jun
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) (2006). Available via https://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convention_accessible_pdf.pdf. Accessed 18 Dec
Docherty B (2009) Breaking new ground: the convention on cluster munitions and the evolution of International Humanitarian Law. Human Rights Quart 31(4):934–963
Docherty B (2013) Ending civilian suffering: the purpose, provisions and promise of humanitarian disarmament law. Austrian Rev Int Eur Law 15(1):8–44
Egeland J (2008) A billion lives: an eyewitness report from the frontlines of humanity. Simon & Schuster, New York, NY
Geneva Call (2005) A Message from the President. Annual Report 2005
GICHD (2011) Assisting landmine and other ERW survivors in the context of disarmament, disability and development. GICHD, Geneva
Handicap International (HI) (2007) Circle of impact: the fatal footprint of cluster munitions on people and communities. Handicap International, Brussels
Howard-Hassman RE (2012) Human security: undermining human rights? Human Rights Quart 34(1):88–112
Human Rights Watch & Physicians for Human Rights (1993) Landmines: a deadly legacy: the first comprehensive examination of the global landmine crisis. October
ICBL (2000) Landmine Monitor Report 2000: toward a mine-free world. Human Rights Watch, New York
ICBL (2002) Landmine Monitor Report 2002: toward a mine-free world. Human Rights Watch, New York
ICBL (2012) Landmine Monitor Report 2012: toward a mine-free world. Mines Action Canada, Ottawa. http://the-monitor.org/en-gb/reports/2012/landmine-monitor-2012.aspx
ICBL website (2020). http://www.icbl.org/en-gb/the-treaty/treaty-status.aspx. Accessed 27 Jun
ICBL-CMC (2019a) Landmine Monitor Report 2019. ICBL-CMC, Geneva, November 2019. http://the-monitor.org/en-gb/reports/2019/landmine-monitor-2019.aspx
ICBL-CMC (2019b) Briefing Paper: Landmine use by non-state armed groups: a 20-year review. November
International Committee of the Red Cross (2020) Customary International Humanitarian Law Rules. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_rul. Accessed 27 Jun
Journeyman Pictures (2008) The fight to rid the world of cluster bombs. https://youtu.be/i4pxkXQ304E. Accessed 27 Jun
Karp A (2002) Laudable failure. SAIS Rev 22(1):177–193
Kjellman KE (2003) Norms, persuasion and practice: landmine Monitor and civil society. Third World Quart 24(5):955–965
Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor (2018)
Mines Advisory Group and British Embassy in Beirut (n.d.) Cluster Munition Contamination in Lebanon using survey data
Nairobi Action Plan (2004). http://www.icbl.org/media/933290/Nairobi-Action-Plan-2005.pdf. Accessed 27 Jun
Policzer P (2005) Neither terrorists nor freedom fighters. Paper presented at the International Studies Association, Honolulu, Hawaii, March
Relief Web (2020). https://reliefweb.int/report/world/us-landmine-policy-change-dangerous-step-forward. Accessed 27 Jun
Rutherford KR (2000) The evolving arms control agenda: implications of the role of NGOs in banning antipersonnel landmines. World Polit 53(1):74–114
Singer J (2005) The confederate dirty war: arson, bombings, assassination, and plots for chemical and germ attacks on the union. McFarland & Company, Jefferson, NC
Swiss Campaign to Ban Landmines in cooperation with the members of the Colombian Campaign to Ban Landmines, Mines Action Canada, the Philippine Campaign to Ban Landmines, the UK Working Group on Landmines and the Zimbabwean Campaign to Ban Landmines. (2001) Engaging non-state actors in a landmine ban, a pioneering conference: full conference proceedings, Geneva, March 2000. Quezon City, Philippines
Thakur R, Maley W (1999) The Ottawa Convention on Landmines: a landmark humanitarian treaty in arms control. Glob Governance 5(3):279–302
Transcript of President Franklin Roosevelt’s Annual Message (Four Freedoms) to Congress (1941) (2020) https://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=false&doc=70&page=transcript. Accessed 25 Jun
UNICEF (1996) The legacy of landmines. https://www.unicef.org/sowc96/9ldmines.htm. Accessed 27 Jun
United Nations General Assembly Human Rights Council (2013) Report of the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, Christof Heyns. A//HRC/23/47. April
UNMAS (2020) International Humanitarian Law Instruments. https://unmas.org/en/resources/lawstreaties. Accessed 27 Jun
Wareham M (2006) The role of landmine monitor in promoting and monitoring compliance with the 1997 Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention. In: Borrie J, Randin VR (eds) Disarmament as humanitarian action: from perspective to practice. United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, Geneva, pp 79–108
White J (1999) Landmine survivors speak out: framework for a mine-free world. Disarmament Forum:7–18
Williams J (1997) Nobel lecture. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/peace/1997/williams/lecture/. Accessed 27 Jun
Williams J, Ensler E (2013) My name is Jody Williams: a Vermont girl’s winding path to the Nobel Peace Prize. University of California Press
World Health Organization (2018) Disability and health. January. https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/disability-and-health. Accessed 25 Jun
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Additional information
Disclaimer: Stephanie Koorey was a researcher to the International Campaign to Ban Landmines and is a member of the Campaign to Stop Killer Robots.
Loren Persi Vicentic writing in their personal capacity.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Koorey, S., Persi Vicentic, L. (2021). Civil Society Coalitions and the Humanitarian Campaigns to Ban Landmines and Cluster Munitions. In: Rogers, D. (eds) Human Rights in War. International Human Rights. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5202-1_12-2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5202-1_12-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-5202-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-5202-1
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Law and CriminologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
Civil Society Coalitions and the Humanitarian Campaigns to Ban Landmines and Cluster Munitions- Published:
- 31 March 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5202-1_12-2
-
Original
Civil Society Coalitions and the Humanitarian Campaigns to Ban Landmines and Cluster Munitions- Published:
- 29 December 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5202-1_12-1