Advertisement

Cognitive Neuroscience Foundations of Surgical and Procedural Expertise: Focus on Theory

  • Pamela AndreattaEmail author
Living reference work entry
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter describes the cognitive processes and associated neuroscientific manifestations of expertise in surgery and other specialties where procedural acumen encompasses a component of expertise, and considers the processes by which health professions’ educators may leverage this knowledge to support the development of expertise in procedural domains. Three primary dimensions of procedural performance are considered, including perceptual expertise (the ability to accurately recognize and differentiate patterns from perceptual inputs), cognitive expertise (the ability to accurately interpret, differentiate, and render decisions in complex environments), and psychomotor expertise (the ability to anticipate and execute accurate motor responses). The foundational elements of expertise are embedded in long-term memory, and the development of expertise requires significant investment by individuals to rigorously engage in the content domain for significant periods of time. Once acquired, expertise appears to be effortless; however, neuroscience confirms that experts’ brains are highly stimulated; they are simply stimulated in different areas than novices, because they have developed different strategies for working within their expertise domain. Importantly, expertise in one domain does not transfer to another domain, primarily because of the very neuroscientific mechanisms by which expertise is developed. If domain patterns alter (e.g., open surgical procedures become laparoscopic procedures), expertise may need to be reacquired to accommodate the changes in the performance domain.

Keywords

Cognitive processing surgical expertise Cognitive neuroscience surgical expertise Acquisition of surgical expertise Developing surgical expertise Expert surgeons Surgical performance acquisition Maintenance of surgical expertise Procedural expertise Developing procedural expertise Cognitive neuroscience procedural expertise Cognitive processing procedural expertise Procedural performance acquisition Procedural mastery Surgical mastery 

References

  1. Amunts K, Schlaug G, Jäncke L, Steinmetz H, Schleicher A, Dabringhaus A, Zilles K. Motor cortex and hand motor skills: structural compliance in the human brain. Hum Brain Mapp. 1997;5(3):206–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bilalić M. The neuroscience of expertise. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2017. p. 225–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bilalić M, Langner R, Erb M, Grodd W. Mechanisms and neural basis of object and pattern recognition: a study with chess experts. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010;139(4):728–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bilalić M, Kiesel A, Pohl C, Erb M, Grodd W. It takes two – skilled recognition of objects engages lateral areas in both hemispheres. PLoS One. 2011;6(1):e16202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bilalić M, Turella L, Campitelli G, Erb M, Grodd W. Expertise modulates the neural basis of context dependent recognition of objects and their relations. Hum Brain Mapp. 2012;33(11):2728–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chase WG, Simon HA. Perception in chess. Cogn Psychol. 1973;4(1):55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Epstein R, Kanwisher N. A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature. 1998;392(6676):598–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: a general overview. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15(11):988–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Feigenbaum EA, Simon HA. EPAM-like models of recognition and learning. Cogn Sci. 1984;8(4):305–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fjell AM, Westlye LT, Amlien I, Espeseth T, Reinvang I, Raz N, Dale AM, Walhovd KB. High consistency of regional cortical thinning in aging across multiple samples. Cereb Cortex. 2009;19(9):2001–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gobet F, Simon HA. Templates in chess memory: a mechanism for recalling several boards. Cogn Psychol. 1996;31(1):1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gobet F, Lane PCR, Croker S, Cheng PCH, Jones G, Oliver I, Pine JM. Chunking mechanisms in human learning. Trends Cogn Sci. 2001;5(6):236–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guida A, Gobet F, Tardieu H, Nicolas S. How chunks, long-term working memory and templates offer a cognitive explanation for neuroimaging data on expertise acquisition: a two-stage framework. Brain Cogn. 2012;79(3):221–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guida A, Gobet F, Nicolas S. Functional cerebral reorganization: a signature of expertise? Reexamining Guida, Gobet, Tardieu, and Nicolas’ (2012) two-stage framework. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kanwisher N, McDermott J, Chun MM. The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. J Neurosci. 1997;17(11):4302–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kundel HL, Nodine CF. Interpreting chest radiographs without visual search. Radiology. 1975;116(3):527–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McCandliss BD, Cohen L, Dehaene S. The visual word form area: expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003;7(7):293–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mireles DE, Charness N. Computational explorations of the influence of structured knowledge on age-related cognitive decline. Psychol Aging. 2002;17(2):245–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mishkin M, Ungerleider LG, Macko KA. Object vision and spatial vision: two cortical pathways. Trends Neurosci. 1983;6:414–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Park S, Chun MM. Different roles of the parahippocampal place area (PPA) and retrosplenial cortex (RSC) in panoramic scene perception. NeuroImage. 2009;47(4):1747–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pascaual-Leone A, Nguyet D, Cohen LG, Brasil-Neto JP, Cammarota A, Hallet M. Modulation of muscle responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation during the acquisition of new fine motor skills. J Neurophysiol. 1995;74(3):1037–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Richman HB, Staszewski JJ, Simon HA. Simulation of expert memory using EPAM IV. Psychol Rev. 1995;102(2):305–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rizzolatti G, Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004;27:169–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sadato N. How the blind “see” Braille: lessons from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroscientist. 2005;11(6):577–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Salthouse T. Major issues in cognitive aging. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schneider W, Chein JM. Controlled & automatic processing: behavior, theory, and biological mechanisms. Cogn Sci. 2003;27(3):525–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schwarzlose RF. Separate face and body selectivity on the fusiform gyrus. J Neurosci. 2005;25(47):11055–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shanteau J. Competence in experts: the role of task characteristics. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1992;53(2):252–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sturman MC. Searching for the inverted U-shaped relationship between time and performance: meta-analyses of the experience/performance, tenure/performance, and age/performance relationships. J Manag. 2003;29(5):609–40.Google Scholar
  30. Sullivan EV, Pfefferbaum A. Diffusion tensor imaging and aging. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2006;30(6):749–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vaci N, Gula B, Bilalić M. Is age really cruel to experts? Compensatory effects of activity. Psychol Aging. 2015;30(4):740–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniformed Services University & the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center “America’s Medical School”BethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations