Advertisement

Education Systems in South Asia

Implications of Globalization and Economic Reforms
  • Baela JamilEmail author
  • Manzoor Ahmed
  • Sakar Pudasaini
Living reference work entry
Part of the Global Education Systems book series (GES)

Abstract

Home to almost a quarter of humanity, South Asia is marked by diversity of cultures, geography, and economies. Comprising mostly of middle- and lower-middle-income countries, there are similarities as well as unique features in problems of education and development faced by them. They have responded in multiple, sometimes contrasting, ways to the influence of globalization and in facing up to the challenges of the twenty-first century.

Buffeted by diverse forces, such as climate change and dangers of international terrorism, there is a new level of awareness today in the world including the region about common risks and dangers to humankind which demand collective and global response. A manifestation of this awareness is the formulation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in 2015, to be achieved by 2030. The globalization context and the fast pace of economic growth in the region present both new challenges and opportunities. The flow of remittances from the global North to global South, and increasingly intraregion, for example, offers better educational choices for families. Another example is the potentials and challenges of educational application of digital technology, which is inextricably linked to globalization and economic change.

SDG 4, the overarching education goal, demands universal and inclusive participation in quality education up to the secondary level by 2030. Yet, over at least 11 million primary-age and almost 21 million lower secondary-age children in South Asia are not even in school, by recent UIS estimate. Civil society, nongovernmental organizations, and governments need to work together with a shared vision to improve the state of education.

We suggest that the discussion of globalization issues and their implications for education and human resource development lends support to the proposition that quality, equity, and inclusion in education are the critical themes in the exploration of objectives, strategies, and how these can be effectively pursued in educational development in South Asia.

Keywords

Globalization Educational response to globalization Regional integration Sustainable Development Goals Inclusive education Quality education Inequality Education technology 

References

  1. ADB. (2017). Innovative strategies for accelerated human resource development in South Asia: Information and communication technology for education – Special focus on Bangladesh, Nepal, and Sri Lanka. Manila: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
  2. Appiah, K. A. (2006). Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a world of strangers. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  3. ASER Center. Pratham India. (2005). https://www.asercentre.org. Accessed 4 Nov 2018.
  4. ASER Pakistan. Idara-e-Taleem-o-Aagahi. (2009). http://aserpakistan.org/index.php. Accessed 4 Nov 2018.
  5. Basu. K. (foreword). In A glass half full: The promise of regional trade in South Asia. Washington, DC: The World Bank. (Kathuria, 2018, p. xvi).Google Scholar
  6. Chang, H.-J. (2002). Kicking away the ladder: Development strategy in historical perspective. London: Anthem.Google Scholar
  7. Chang, H-J. (2003). Globalization, economic development, and the role of the state (Essay collection). London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  8. Chusseau, N., & Hellier, J. (2012). Globalisation and inequality: Where do we stand? (Working paper series 2012/279). Rome: Society for the Study of Economic Inequality (ENCINE).Google Scholar
  9. Education Commission: The learning generation: Investing in education for a changing world; A report by the International Commission on Financing Global Education Opportunity. (2017). http://report.educationcommission.org/report/.
  10. Education Commission: Investing in knowledge sharing to Advance SDG 4. International Commission on Financing Global Education Opportunity (Education Commission) (2018), Center for Global Education at Asia Society, Results for Development, Teach For All, The Boston Consulting Group, and World Innovation Summit for Education.Google Scholar
  11. Friedman, T. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  12. Gaible, E. (2018). A Scoping Study: Transforming Education Through Technology (Heart).Google Scholar
  13. Galasso, N., & Wood, M. (2015). 8 ways to reduce global inequality, February 26. https://fpif.org/8-ways-reduce-global-inequality/
  14. Giddens, A. (2000). Anthony Giddens discusses the globalization debate. Carnegie endowment for international peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/2000/07/05/anthony-giddens-discusses-globalization-debate-pub-8655
  15. Gurung. (2018, April 19). I have to feed myself, my family and my country…. Retrieved from http://hitmangurung.blogspot.com/p/project-2012.html
  16. Himmelsbach, V. (2019). 6 Pros & Cons of technology in the classroom in 2019. Education Technology Blogs, January 2, 2019. Toronto: Top Hat Education Technology. https://tophat.com/articles/education-technology/
  17. Human Development Indices and Indicators: 2018 Statistical Update – UNDP NY, 2018.Google Scholar
  18. International Fund For Agricultural Development (IFAD). (2017). Sending money home, contributing to SDGs, one family at a time. Rome: IFAD.Google Scholar
  19. Karim T. (2018). Reviving the Bengal Presidency template of connectivity: Regional prosperity sans the colonial baggage. Daily Star. Accessed 4 Nov 2018.Google Scholar
  20. Kathuria, S. (2018). A glass half full: The promise of regional trade in South Asia (South Asia development forum). Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  21. Kuriata A. (2016). Hijan – Muslim response to globalisation? Człowiek i Społeczeństwo (Vol. XLI, pp. 147–161). Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University Press. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=517637
  22. Lancet. (2018). Measuring human capital: a systematic analysis of 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016. September 24, 2018. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(18)31941-X/fulltext
  23. Learning to Realize Education’s Promise. World Development Report. (2018). World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2018
  24. Lynch, M. (2018, May 06). 10 Edtech Investment Groups and venture capitalist firms that you should know about. Retrieved from https://www.thetechedvocate.org/10-edtech-investment-groups-and-venture-capitalist-firms-that-you-should-know-about/
  25. Maurer, T. (2018, December 27). How Asia is emerging as the World’s Edtech Laboratory – EdSurge News. Retrieved from https://www.edsurge.com/news/2015-01-02-how-asia-is-emerging-as-the-world-s-edtech-laboratory
  26. Milanovic, B. (2012). Can we discern the effect of globalization on income distribution? Evidence from household budget surveys, Chap. 15. In B. Milanovic (Ed.), Globalisation and inequality. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  27. Milanovic, B. (2016). Global inequality: A new approach for the age of globalization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Murlidharan, K., Singh, A., & Ganimian, A. J. (2019). Disrupting education? Experimental evidence on technology-aided instruction in India. American Economic Review, 109(4), 1426–1460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Oxfam. (2018). Reward work not wealth. London: Oxfam.Google Scholar
  30. PAL Network – Peoples Action for Learning Network. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://palnetwork.org/
  31. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Richter, S. (2018). Why Donald Trump is Completely Wrong About Globalism. The Globalist. Accessed 4 Nov 2018. http://www.theglobalist.com/globalism-patriotism-donald-trump-united-states/
  33. Ritzer, G. (2008). The McDonaldization of society. Los Angeles: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
  34. Schumacher, E. F. (1973). Small is beautiful: A study of economics as if people mattered. London: Blond & Briggs.Google Scholar
  35. Seabrook, J. (1996). Third World Network Features. http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/27c/432.html
  36. Sen, A. (2002). How to judge globalism. The American Prospect, 13, pA2. http://www.sas.upenn.edu/~dludden/SenGlobalism.htm.Google Scholar
  37. Seth, S. (2019). South Asia: The new face of emerging economies. Retrieved from https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/022316/south-asia-new-face-emerging-economies.asp
  38. Stiglitz, J. E. (2006). Making globalization work. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  39. Sustainable Development Goals. United Nations. (2015). https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/
  40. UNESCO. (2015). Rethinking education: Towards a global common good? Paris: UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002325/232555e.pdf.Google Scholar
  41. White, P. L. (2006). Globalization and the mythology of the Nation State. In A. G. Hopkins (Ed.), Global history: Interactions between the universal and the local (pp. 257–284). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Winters, A. L., McCulloch, N., & McKay, A. (2004). Trade liberalization and poverty: The evidence so far. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(1), 72–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Program and PolicyIdara-e-Taleem-o-AagahiLahorePakistan
  2. 2.BRAC Institute of Educational Development (BIED)BRAC UniversityDhakaBangladesh
  3. 3.KarkhanaKathmanduNepal

Section editors and affiliations

  • Amita Chudgar
  • Monazza Aslam
    • 1
  1. 1.University of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations