Advertisement

Coupling Models of New Material Synthesis in Modern Technologies

  • Anna Knyazeva
  • Olga Kryukova
  • Svetlana Sorokova
  • Sergey Shanin
Living reference work entry
First Online:

Abstract

Today, additive manufacturing (AM) technologies attract large attention. One can define these technologies as step-by-step construction or synthesis of parts from identical or different materials. Stereolithography, selective laser melting, selective laser sintering, hot isostatic pressing, and combined technologies belong to AM technologies. Electron-beam (EB) technologies are also popular. Coating synthesis and surface treatment using EB, composite material synthesis, and various technologies of material joining could be also added to additive manufacturing. Since the experimental investigation of technological processes (dynamics of chemical composition, evolution of structure and properties) is very complicated, mathematical modeling can help in this field. This section presents the approach to predictive model construction. Together with chemical reactions accompanying the change of properties, the technological conditions are analyzed. General equations include the energy equation, balance equations for species, equilibrium equation, and governing equation containing terms describing numerous cross effects. Examples of particular model are presented for accepted technologies of surface treatment. The first model describes the surface modification using electron beam and particles that dissolve in a melting pool and change the composition. The second model describes the composition change during the coating deposition and includes coupling effects between transfer processes and mechanical ones. Multilayered coating forms on the metal surface during ion deposition from gas, solution, or plasma. The third model gives the modeling concept for choosing the technological conditions for homogeneous coating creation on the substrate using chemical reactions and external heating. These models relate immediately to additive manufacturing where metals are used.

Keywords

Coupled Model Melt Pool Ferric Carbide Formal Kinetic Parameters Physicochemical Conversions 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Poate JM, Foti G, Jacobson DC. Surface modification and alloying: by laser, ion, and electron beams. New York: Springer; 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tracton AA, editor. Coating technology. Fundamentals, testing, and processing. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group; 2007.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bullinger H-J, editor. Technology guide. Principles – applications – trends. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer; 2009.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mazurkiewicz A, Smolik J. The innovative directions in development and implementations of hybrid technologies in surface engineering. Archives of metallurgy and material. 2015;60(3):2161–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zenker R, Spies H-J, Buchwalder A, Sacher G. Combination of high energy beam processing with thermochemical treatment and hard protective coating: state of the art. International Heat Treatment and Surface Engineering. 2007;1(4):152–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kostyuk GI. The perspective of development of combined technologies with help of ion, electron, light-beam and plasma fluxes for the receipt of the improved surface properties. 19th International Symposium on Discharges and Electrical Insulation in Vacuum, Xi'an 2000;2:663–6.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Murr LE, Gaytan SM, Ramirez DA, Martinez E, Hernandez J, Amato KN, Shindo PW, Medina FR, Wicker RB. Metal fabrication by additive manufacturing using laser and electron beam melting technologies. J Mater Sci Technology. 2012;28(1):1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Travitzky N, Bonet A, Dermeik B, Fey T, Filbert-Demut I, Schlier L, Schlordt T, Greil P. Additive manufacturing of ceramic-based materials. Adv Eng Mater. 2014;16(6):729–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Levenspiel O. Chemical reaction engineering. 3rd ed. New York/Chichester/Weinheim/Brisbane/Singapore/Toronto: Wiley; 1999.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davis ME. Davis RJ. Fundamentals of Chemical Reaction Engineering: Published by McGraw-Hili; 2003.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Merzhanov AG, Mukasyan AS. Solid-flame combustion (Tverdoplamennoe gorenie – in Russian). Moscow: Torus Press; 2007.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Regel VR, Slutsker AI, Tomashevskii EE. Kinetical nature of the strength of solid bodies (Kineticheskaya priroda prochnosti tverdykh tel – in Russian). Moscow: Nauka; 1974.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Casale A, Porter RS. Polymer stress reactions. (Reakzii polimerov pod deistviem napryazhenii – in Russian). Khimiya: Leningrad; 1983.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Knyazeva AG. Ignition of a condensed substance by a hot plate with consideration of thermal stresses. Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves. 1992;28(1):10–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chupakhin AP, Sidelnikov AA, Boldyrev VV. Influence of mechanical stresses appearing during solid-phase chemical conversions on their kinetics. General approach (Vliyanie voznikayushchikh pri tverdofaznykh khimicheskich prevrashcheniykh mechanicheskikh napryazheniy na ikh kinetiku. Obshchiy podkhod – in Russian). Izv SB AN SSSR., ser Chimich, nauki 1985;6:31–8.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Knyazeva AG. Hot-spot thermal explosion in deformed solids. Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves. 1993;29(4):419–28.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nemat-Nasser S, Hori M. Micromechanics: overall properties of heterogeneous materials. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: North-Holland; 1999.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Krivilyov MD, Mesarovic SD, Sekulic DP. Phase-field model of interface migration and powder consolidation in additive manufacturing of metals. J Mater Sci. 2017;52(8):4155–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    De Groot SR, Mazur P. Non-equilibrium thermodynamics. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company; 1962.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kondepudi D, Prigogine I. Modern thermodynamics: from heat engines to dissipative structures. Chichester: Wiley; 2014.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kachanov M, Sevostianov I. Effective properties of heterogeneous materials. Dordrecht: Springer; 2013.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hill R. Elastic properties of reinforced solids: some theoretical principles. J Mech Phys Solids. 1963;11:357–72.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Belyuk SI, Panin VE. Vacuum electron-beam powder technology: equipment, technology, and application. Fizicheskaya Mesomechanica. 2002;5(1):99–104. (in Russian)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kryukova ON, Knyazeva AG. Critical phenomena in particle dissolution in the melt during electron-beam surfacing. J Appl Mech Tech Phys. 2007;48(1):109–18.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Romankov PG, Rashkovskaya NB, Frolov VF. Mass exchange processes in the chemical engineering (systems with solid phase) (Massoobmennye processy v chimicheskoi technologii. Systemy s tverdoi fasoi. – in Russian). Khimiya: Leningrad; 1975.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Knyazeva AG, Pobol IL, Gordienko AI, Demidov VN, Kryukova ON, Oleschuk IG. Simulation of thermophysical and physico-chemical processes occurring at coating formation in electron-beam technologies of surface modification of metallic materials. Physical Mesomechamics. 2007;10(3–4):207–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hansen M, Anderko K. Constitution of binary alloys. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1958.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Karapetiync MK. Chemical thermodynamics. Khimiya: Moscow; 1975. (in Russian)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Galchenko NK, Belyuk SI, Panin VE, Samartsev VP, Shilenko AV, Lepakova OK. Electron-beam facing of the composite coatings on the base of titanium Diboride. Fizika i Khimiya Obraotki Materialov. 2002;4:68–72. (in Russian)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kryukova O, Kolesnikova K, Gal'chenko N. Numerical and experimental study of electron-beam coatings with modifying particles FeB and FeTi. IOP Conference Series-Materials Science and Engineering. 2016;140:012011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sarakinos K, Alami J, Konstantinidis S. High power pulsed magnetron sputtering: a review on scientific and engineering state of the art. J Surface & Coatings Technology. 2010;204:1661–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ali R, Sebastiani M, Bemporad E. Influence of Ti–TiN multilayer PVD-coatings design on residual stresses and adhesion. J Materials & Design. 2015;75:47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Knyazeva AG, Shanin SA. Modeling of evolution of growing coating composition. Acta Mech. 2016;227:75–104.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Knyazeva AG. Connected equations of heat and mass transfer in a chemically reacting solid mixture with allowance for deformation and damage. J Appl Mech Tech Phys. 1996;37(3):381–90.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Knyazeva AG, Demidov VN. Transfer coefficients for three component deformable alloy. Vestnik PermGTU. Mechanika. 2011;3:84–99. (in Russian)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Shanin SA, Knyazeva AG. Multilayer coating formation at the deposition from plasma. IOP Conf. Series. Mater Sci Eng. 2016;116:012003.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Shanin S, Knyazeva A, Kryukova O. Coating composition evolution during the deposition of al and N from plasma on a cylindrical substrate. Key Eng Mater. 2015;685:690–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Timoshenko SP, Goodier JN. Theory of elasticity. New York: McCraw-Hill; 1970.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Boly BA, Weiner JH. Theory of thermal stresses. Chichester: Wiley; 1960.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Barvinok VA. Controlling of stressed state and properties of plasmatic coatings. (Upravlenie napryazhennym sostoyaniem i svoistva plazmennykh pokrytiy. – in Russian). Moscow: MIR; 1964.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Shanin SA, Knyazeva AG. On the numerical solution of non-isothermal multicomponent diffusion with variable coefficients. Computational technologies. 2016;21(2):88–97.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Grigoriev IC, Meylikhov EZ. Physical values. (Fizicheskie velichiny. Spravochnik - in Russian). Moscow: Energoatomizdat; 1991.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Prokof’ev VG, Smolyakov VK. Impact of structural factors on unsteady combustion modes of gasless systems. Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves. 2003;39(2):167–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ivleva TP, Merzhanov AG. Mathematical simulation of three-dimensional spin regimes of gasless combustion. Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves. 2002;38(1):41–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Knyazeva AG, Chashchina AA. Numerical study of the problem of thermal ignition in a thick walled container. Combustion, explosion and. Shock Waves. 2004;40(4):432–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Shishkovskii IV. Laser synthesis of functional-gradient meso structures and volume articles (Lazernyi sintez functionalno-gradientnykh mesostruktur I ob’emnykh izdelii. – in Russian). FIZMATLIT: Moscow; 2009.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Knyazeva АG, Sorokova SN. Simulation of coating phase structure formation in solid phase synthesis assisted by electron-beam treatment. Theor Found Chem Eng. 2008;42(4):457–65.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Knyazeva АG, Sorokova SN. Numerical study of the influence of the technological parameters on the composition and stressed-deformed state of a coating synthesized under electron-beam. Theor Found Chem Eng. 2010;44(2):184–97.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna Knyazeva
    • 1
    • 2
  • Olga Kryukova
    • 2
  • Svetlana Sorokova
    • 1
  • Sergey Shanin
    • 1
  1. 1.Tomsk Polytechnic UniversityTomskRussia
  2. 2.Institute of Strength Physics and Materials Science of Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of SciencesTomskRussia

Personalised recommendations

Cite entry