Advertisement

Memory Work

  • Lia BryantEmail author
  • Katerina Bryant
Reference work entry

Abstract

Memory work is a methodology and method first introduced by Frigga Haug and others in Germany and appeared in academic publications in the 1980s. As an approach to data collection, memory work involves writing a memory in the third person in relation to a question or theme. The methodology and method was used with groups of women to examine power relations through writing and analyzing specific situations. Memory work is an approach that enables emotions to come to the fore, particularly emotions that are not easily voiced. Through processes of writing in the third person and time for analysis and rewriting, the approach provides distance and space for the emotional and sensory to emerge. Memory work facilitates the discovery of the tangible and intangible aspects of sensations that may not emerge from other qualitative methods like semi-structured interviews. In this chapter, the research processes for using memory work are outlined and contextualized in relation to working with individual participants and groups. Processes for analyzing memories are explained and examined as are the ethical dimensions of writing, sharing, analyzing, and publishing memories that have arisen from groups or participants.

Keywords

Memory work Collective analysis Ethics Reflexivity Social transformation Living historically 

References

  1. Acker J. Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: a theory of gendered organizations. Gend Soc. 1990;4(3): 139–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakhtin MM. The dialogic imagination: four essays, vol. 1. Austin: University of Texas Press; 1981.Google Scholar
  3. Bryant L. Taking up the call for critical and creative methods in social work research. In: Bryant L, editor. Critical and creative research methodologies in social work. Farnham: Ashgate; 2015. p. 1–26.Google Scholar
  4. Bryant L, Jaworski K. Women supervising and writing doctoral theses. Lanham: Lexington Books; 2015.Google Scholar
  5. Bryant L, Livholts M. Exploring the gendering of space by using memory work as a reflexive research method. Int J Qual Methods. 2007;6(3):29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bryant L, Livholts M. Location and unlocation: examining gender and telephony through autoethnographic textual and visual methods. Int J Qual Methods. 2013;12:403–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bryant L, Livholts M. Memory work and reflexive gendered bodies: examining rural landscapes in the making. In: Pini B, Brandth B, Little J, editors. Rural femininities. Plymouth: Lexington Books; 2014. p. 181–94.Google Scholar
  8. Cadman K, Friend L, Gannon S. Memory-workers doing memory-work on memory work: exploring unresolved power. In: Small J, Onyx J, editors. Memory-work: a critique. Sydney: School of Management, University of Technology; 2001.Google Scholar
  9. Crawford J, Kippax S, Onyx J, Gault U, Benton P. Emotion and gender: constructing meaning from memory. London: Sage; 1992.Google Scholar
  10. Davies B, Dormer S, Laws C, Rocco S, Lenz Taguchi H, McCann H. Becoming schoolgirls: the ambivalent project of subjectification. Gend Educ. 2001;13(2):167–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Finlay L. Negotiating the swamp: the opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qual Res. 2002;22:209–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fraser H, Michell D. Feminist memory work in action: method and practicalities. Qual Soc Work. 2015;14(3):321–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frost A, Eatough V, Shaw R, Weille KL, Tzemou E, Baraitser L. Pleasure, pain and procrastination: reflections on the experience of doing memory-work research. Qual Res Psychol. 2012;9(33):231–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garcia-Montes JM, Kaballero-Munos D, Perez-Alvarez M. Changes in the self resulting from the use of mobile phones. Media Cult Soc. 2006;28(1):67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gillies V, Harden A, Johnson K, Reavy P, Strange V, Willig C. Women’s collective constructions of embodied practices through memory work: Cartesian dualism in memories of sweating and pain. Br J Psychol. 2004;43(1):99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haraway D. Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Fem Stud. 1988;14(3):575–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harden A, Willig C. An exploration of the discursive constructions used in young adults’ memories and accounts of contraception. J Health Psychol. 1998;3(3):29–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haug F, et al. Female sexualization, translated from the German by Erica Carter, London: Verso; 1987.Google Scholar
  19. Haug F. Philosophy and overview of memory work. In: Hyle AE, Ewing MS, Montogmery D, Kaufman JS, editors. Dissecting the mundane: international perspectives on memory work. Lanham: University Press of America; 2008. p. 3–16.Google Scholar
  20. Haug F. Memory-work as a method of social science research: a detailed rendering of memory-work method, a research guide. (undated). Retrieved from http://www.friggahaug.inkrit.de/documents/memorywork-researchguidei7.pdf.
  21. Henriksson M, Jansson M, Thomsson U, Wendt Hojer M, Ace C. In the name of science. A work of memory. Kvinnovetenskaplrg Tidskr. 2000;21(1):5–25.Google Scholar
  22. Jansson M, Wendt M, Åse C. Memory work reconsidered. Nord J Fem Gend Res. 2008;16(4): 228–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Koutroulis G. Memory-work: a critique. Ann Rev Health Soc Sci. 2014;3(1):76–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Livholts M, Bryant L. Gender and the telephone: voice and emotions shaping and gendering space. Human Technology, 2013;9(2):157–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mason J, Davies K. Coming to our sense? A critical approach to sensory methodology. Qual Res. 2009;9(5):587–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Newton VL. ‘It’s good to be able to talk’: an exploration of the complexities of participant and researcher relationships when conducting sensitive research. Women’s Stud Int Forum. 2017;61:93–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Onyx J, Small J. Memory-work: the method. Qual Inq. 2001;7(6):773–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pillow W. Confession, catharsis or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. Int J Qual Stud Educ. 2003;16(2):175–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shea R, Bryant L, Wendt S. Nappy bags instead of handbags: experiences of young motherhood. J Sociol. 2016;52(4):840–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stephenson N. Living history, undoing linearity: memory-work as a research method in the social sciences. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):33–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stephenson N, Kippax S. Memory work. In: Willig C, Stainton-Rogers W, editors. The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2008. p. 127–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Widerberg K. Alternative methods – alternative understandings: exploring the social and multiple ‘I’, through memory-work. Sociologisk Tidsskr. 1999;2:147–61.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Psychology, Social Work and Social Policy, Centre for Social ChangeUniversity of South AustraliaMagillAustralia
  2. 2.Department of English and Creative WritingFlinders UniversityBedford ParkAustralia

Personalised recommendations