Critical Ethnography in Public Health: Politicizing Culture and Politicizing Methodology

  • Patti ShihEmail author
Reference work entry


Critical ethnography is a methodological approach to ethnographic research that is explicitly political in its epistemic and empirical focus on challenging power relations and political inequality. It has an epistemic concern about how the notion of “culture” is produced in the research process, through the assumed objective position of the researcher as the “knower” and the study participants as the “known,” and thus taken for granted as a true representation of social reality. This is particularly problematic if this account of culture is integrated into public health programs as an object of intervention and decontextualized from the wider social and political structures that shape inequalities in health and healthcare outcomes. Empirically, critical ethnography attends to an expansive analysis of power relationships, by highlighting issues of social exclusion, marginalization, and injustice in its research focus. The chapter draws on my experience as a novice ethnographic researcher in Papua New Guinea, which taught me the importance of understanding structural factors that contextualize the relationship between culture and health, as well as a critically reflexive research position. The chapter discusses how critical ethnography politicizes the interpretive process through a commitment to collaborative meaning-making between researchers and study participants, which enables the social utility of ethnographic knowledge for political action well after the completion of research.


Critical ethnography Ethnography Epistemology Culture Public health research Interventionism 


  1. Abu-Lughod L. Writing against culture. In: Fox RG, editor. Recapturing anthropology: working in the present. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press; 1991. p. 137–62.Google Scholar
  2. Airhihenbuwa CO, Kumanyika S, Agurs TD, Lowe A, Saunders D, Morssink CB. Cultural aspects of African American eating patterns. Ethn Health. 1996;1(3):245–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Briggs CL. Communicability, racial discourse, and disease. Annu Rev Anthropol. 2005;34:269–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clifford J, Marcus GE. Writing culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1986.Google Scholar
  5. Cook KE. Using critical ethnography to explore issues in health promotion. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(1):129–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Denzin NK, Giardina MD. Qualitative inquiry and the politics of evidence. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press; 2008.Google Scholar
  7. Farmer P. Infections and inequalities: the modern plagues. Berley: University of California Press; 2001.Google Scholar
  8. Fassin D. Culturalism as ideology. In: Obermeyer CM, editor. Cultural perspectives on reproductive health. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001. p. 300–17.Google Scholar
  9. Fassin D. A case for critical ethnography: rethinking the early years of the AIDS epidemic in South Africa. Soc Sci Med. 2013;99:119–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Foley DE. Critical ethnography: the reflexive turn. Int J Qual Stud Educ. 2002;15(4):469–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Foley DE, Valenzuela A. Critical ethnography: the politics of collaboration. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln Y, editors. The landscape of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2008. p. 287–310.Google Scholar
  12. Foucault M. The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language (trans: Sheridan A). New York: Pantheon; 1972.Google Scholar
  13. Glick Schiller NC. What’s wrong with this picture? The hegemonic construction of culture in AIDS research in the United States. Med Anthropol Q. 1992;6(3):237–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Glick Schiller NC, Crystal S, Lewellen D. Risky business: the cultural construction of AIDS risk groups. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38(10):1337–46. Scholar
  15. Greenhalgh T, Annandale E, Ashcroft R, Barlow J, Black N, Bleakley A, … Carnevale F. An open letter to The BMJ editors on qualitative research. BMJ. 2016; 352(i563):1–4.Google Scholar
  16. Gregg J, Saha S. Losing culture on the way to competence: the use and misuse of culture in medical education. Acad Med. 2006;81(6):542–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hesse-Biber SN. Mixed methods research: merging theory with practice. New York: Guilford Press; 2010.Google Scholar
  18. Inhorn MC, Whittle KL. Feminism meets the “new” epidemiologies: toward an appraisal of antifeminist biases in epidemiological research on women’s health. Soc Sci Med. 2001;53(5): 553–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liamputtong P. Qualitative research methods. 4th ed. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2013.Google Scholar
  20. Liamputtong P. Public health: an introduction to local and global contexts. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Public health: local and global perspectives. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press; 2016. p. 1–21.Google Scholar
  21. Liamputtong P. Culture as social determinant of health. In: Liamputtong P, editor. Social determinants of health: individual, community and healthcare. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; in press.Google Scholar
  22. Madison DS. Critical ethnography: method, ethics, and performance. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2011.Google Scholar
  23. Maher L. Don’t leave us this way: ethnography and injecting drug use in the age of AIDS. Int J Drug Policy. 2002;13(4):311–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mertens DM. Transformative paradigm mixed methods and social justice. J Mixed Methods Res. 2007;1(3):212–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Metzl JM, Hansen H. Structural competency: theorizing a new medical engagement with stigma and inequality. Soc Sci Med. 2014;103:126–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pigg SL. On sitting and doing: ethnography as action in global health. Soc Sci Med. 2013;99:127–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pope C. Conducting ethnography in medical settings. Med Educ. 2005;39(12):1180–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rabinow P. Representations are social facts: modernity and post-modernity in anthropology. Writ Cult Poetics Politics Ethnogr. 1986;234:261.Google Scholar
  29. Rosaldo R. Ideology, place, and people without culture. Cult Anthropol. 1988;3(1):77–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shih P. The biopolitics of change: a Foucauldian analysis of Christian healthcare and HIV prevention in Papua New Guinea. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of New South Wales; 2015.Google Scholar
  31. Shih P, Worth H, Travaglia J, Kelly-Hanku A. ‘Good culture, bad culture’: polygyny, cultural change and structural drivers of HIV in Papua New Guinea. Cult Health Sex. 2017;19(9): 1024–37. Scholar
  32. Sovran S. Understanding culture and HIV/AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa. SAHARA-J: J Soc Asp HIV/AIDS. 2013;10(1):32–41.Google Scholar
  33. Taylor JJ. Assisting or compromising intervention? The concept of ‘culture’ in biomedical and social research on HIV/AIDS. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64(4):965–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. van Meijl T. The critical ethnographer as trickster. Anthropol Forum. 2005;15(3):235–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wilson BDM, Miller RL. Examining strategies for culturally grounded HIV prevention: a review. AIDS Educ Prev. 2003;15(2):184–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health and Innovation (AIHI)Macquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations